Table 9
Results from the different estimators for fNL for the set of SMICA simulations based on FFP8 described in Sect. 5.3.
| f NL | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Shape | KSW | Binned | Modal 1 | Modal 2 | Mink.F. | B − KSW | M1 − KSW | M2 − KSW | MF − KSW |
|
|
|||||||||
| T | |||||||||
| Local .............. | 7.1 ± 5.5 | 7.0 ± 5.4 | 6.2 ± 5.5 | 6.3 ± 6.2 | 7 ± 12 | −0.1 ± 1.1 | −0.9 ± 1.9 | −0.8 ± 1.9 | 0 ± 11 |
| Equilateral .............. | 2 ± 67 | 4 ± 67 | −4 ± 73 | 5 ± 66 | ... | 2 ± 19 | −6 ± 32 | 3 ± 18 | ... |
| Orthogonal .............. | −23 ± 32 | −24 ± 33 | −24 ± 33 | −20 ± 36 | ... | −1 ± 11 | −0.9 ± 9.1 | 3 ± 14 | ... |
| E .............. | |||||||||
| Local .............. | 0.5 ± 32 | 0 ± 35 | 1 ± 30 | ... | 0 ± 49 | −0.8 ± 8.3 | 0.7 ± 8.3 | ... | 0 ± 37 |
| Equilateral .............. | 7 ± 144 | 7 ± 143 | 9 ± 152 | ... | ... | 0 ± 37 | 2 ± 35 | ... | ... |
| Orthogonal .............. | 5 ± 72 | 7 ± 75 | 4 ± 73 | ... | ... | 2 ± 22 | −1 ± 17 | ... | ... |
| T+E .............. | |||||||||
| Local .............. | 5.6 ± 5.1 | 5.0 ± 4.9 | 4.7 ± 4.8 | 4.3 ± 5.3 | 5 ± 11 | −0.6 ± 1.2 | −0.9 ± 1.5 | −1.3 ± 1.7 | −1 ± 11 |
| Equilateral .............. | 3 ± 46 | 5 ± 44 | 3 ± 46 | 4 ± 43 | ... | 2 ± 14 | 0 ± 14 | 1.0 ± 9.7 | ... |
| Orthogonal .............. | −10 ± 22 | −9 ± 22 | −9 ± 21 | −7 ± 22 | ... | 0.8 ± 7.0 | 0.8 ± 7.3 | 2.7 ± 7.7 | ... |
Notes. Both the results for the estimators individually and for the differences with KSW are given, for T-only, E-only, and the full combined T+E analysis. The shapes are assumed independent and the lensing-ISW bias has not been subtracted.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.