Table 22
Peak statistics for the resonance models showing the maximum Raw peak significance, the Single peak significance after accounting for the parameter survey “look-elsewhere” effect, and the Multi-peak statistic integrating across all peaks (also accounting for the “look-elsewhere” correction).
SMICA | SEVEM | NILC | Commander | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Raw | Single | Multi | Raw | Single | Multi | Raw | Single | Multi | Max. | Single | Multi | |
|
||||||||||||
Sin(log) constant T-only | 2.4 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
Sin(log) constant T+E | 2.4 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 2.5 |
Sin(log) equilateral T-only | 3.0 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 2.1 |
Sin(log) equilateral T+E | 3.5 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Sin(log) flattened T-only | 2.5 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
Sin(log) flattened T+E | 2.9 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 4.5 |
Notes. There is some evidence for a high signal for both the equilateral and flattened resonance models, which increases when the polarization signal is added. This table does not include the results of the high frequency resonance model estimator, whose significance was assessed independently.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.