Free Access

This article has an erratum: [erratum]

Table 5

Comparisons of stellar parameters and abundances for stars in common with other studies.

Reddy03 Reddy06 Mashonkina04 Mashonkina07 Mishenina13

ΔTeff [K] 132 ± 52 (13) 114 ± 114 (55) 4 ± 69 (19) 20 ± 101 (26) 9 ± 54 (8)
Δlog g 0.05 ± 0.09 (13) 0.01 ± 0.17 (55) 0.01 ± 0.12 (19) 0.03 ± 0.13 (26) 0.04 ± 0.11 (8)
Δ[Sr/H]
Δ[Zr/H] 0.19 (1) –0.02 (4) 0.08 (3)
Δ[La/H] 0.18 (1)
Δ[Ce/H] 0.23 (3) −0.04 (14) −0.18 (4) 0.12 (1)
Δ[Nd/H] 0.16 (1) −0.04 (15) −0.12 (4) 0.12 (1)
Δ[Sm/H] 0.21 (2)
Δ[Eu/H] −0.06 (1) 0.05 (21) 0.11 (2)

Notes. Differences in stellar parameters from Bensby et al. (2014) and abundances from this work with the stars in common with Reddy et al. (2003, 2006), Mashonkina et al. (2004, 2007), and Mishenina et al. (2013). The differences are given as this work minus the other studies. In parenthesis: the number of common stars used for the different comparisons.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.