Table 2
TEMPO2 best fit parameters to the post-glitch X-ray data.
| Parameter | Wong et al. (2001) | Backer et al. (2000) | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|
|
||||
| tg (MJD) |
|
|||
| τn (days) | 2.9 ± 1.8 | |||
| Δνn (10-7 Hz) | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 0.9 |
| Δνp (10-7 Hz) | 0.17 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.06 |
 (10-15 s-2) |
−14.2 ± 0.6 | −13 ± 2 | −8 ± 3 | −14 ± 2 |
Notes. The second column lists the glitch parameters derived by Wong et al. (2001). Their values of glitch epoch tg and decay time scale τn have been used as given constants. The derived glitch parameters are (a) jump in frequency that is exponentially recovered Δνn; (b) permanent jump in frequency Δνp, and (c) permanent jump in frequency derivative . The third to fifth columns list the values derived using the model of Backer et al. (2000), and models 1 and 2 in Table 1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.