Fig. 15
Uncertainty of the EBHIS–LAB column density distribution. Top panel: relative column density difference of EBHIS with respect to LAB. Bottom panel: the 68.3% (CL-1), 95.4% (Cl-2), and 99.7% (CL-3) confidence intervals from the distribution in the top panel. Because the difference between two distributions has a wider spread than the two constituents, we rescale the difference ΔNH i to the equivalent standard deviation . The dashed lines represent the theoretical expectation, for the case where the error is caused by pure thermal noise, as measured in emission-line free regions, plus an additional contribution of 2.5% that represents the typical intensity calibration uncertainties.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.