Table 2
List of alternatives for several phenomenological model functions of eclipses.
| Fe(ϕ) | s | Parameters | |
| mmag | |||
|
|
|||
| 1 |
|
3.4 | A,D,Γ,C |
| 2 |
|
3.9 | A,D,Γ |
| 3 |
|
5.5 | A,D,Γ |
| 4 |
|
6.9 | A,D,Γ |
| 5 |
|
11 | A,D |
| 6 |
|
16 | A,D |
| 7 |
|
18 | A,D |
Notes. The fidelity of individual alternatives are illustrated by the Fig. 9 and quantified by the scatter s of the fit of the “real” LC of primary minimum of AR Aur, simulated by its physical model. The model function number 4 was suggested by Andronov (2010, 2012), the function ‘Real’ extracts a real part of the argument.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.