Table 4
Best fits for specific DM annihilation channels assuming the best propagation parameter set.
| Channel | m χ | ⟨ σv ⟩ | K 0 | L | δ | χ 2 |
|
p |
| [TeV] | [ cm3 s-1 ] | [ kpc2 Myr-1 ] | [ kpc ] | |||||
|
|
||||||||
| e | 0.350 ± 0.001 | (1.88 ± 0.03) × 10-24 | 0.00405 | 1.5 | 0.70 | 682 | 16.6 | 0 |
| μ | 0.422 ± 0.018 | (3.99 ± 0.30) × 10-24 | 0.00540 | 2.0 | 0.70 | 99.2 | 2.42 | 9.8 × 10-7 |
| τ | 1.26 ± 0.07 | (3.47 ± 0.31) × 10-23 | 0.00670 | 2.0 | 0.65 | 24.1 | 0.59 | 0.98 |
| u | 33.7 ± 3.3 | (1.61 ± 0.24) × 10-21 | 0.00930 | 2.0 | 0.60 | 18.1 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| b | 30.3 ± 2.7 | (1.19 ± 0.16) × 10-21 | 0.00910 | 2.0 | 0.60 | 17.7 | 0.43 | 0.99 |
| t | 50.8 ± 4.1 | (2.39 ± 0.30) × 10-21 | 0.00775 | 2.5 | 0.70 | 17.7 | 0.43 | 0.99 |
| Z | 20.0 ± 1.3 | (9.65 ± 1.01) × 10-22 | 0.00675 | 3.0 | 0.75 | 17.7 | 0.43 | 0.99 |
| W | 17.5 ± 0.1 | (8.40 ± 0.90) × 10-22 | 0.00675 | 3.0 | 0.75 | 17.6 | 0.43 | 0.99 |
| H | 31.7 ± 2.2 | (1.26 ± 0.14) × 10-21 | 0.00690 | 3.0 | 0.75 | 17.6 | 0.43 | 0.99 |
| φ → e | 0.350 ± 0.005 | (1.31 ± 0.02) × 10-24 | 0.00440 | 2.0 | 0.65 | 143 | 3.48 | 0 |
| φ → μ | 0.763 ± 0.034 | (7.77 ± 0.56) × 10-24 | 0.00660 | 2.0 | 0.65 | 44.7 | 1.09 | 0.32 |
| φ → τ | 2.43 ± 0.13 | (6.80 ± 0.61) × 10-23 | 0.00680 | 2.0 | 0.65 | 22.9 | 0.56 | 0.99 |
Notes. The recently published positron fraction (Accardo et al. 2014) and the AMS-02 lepton spectrum (Weng et al. 2014) are used to derive the χ2, as in formula (20). The p-value, indicated in the last column, is defined in formula (22).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.