Table 4
Summary of the accuracy reached on squared visibilities V2 and closure phases (CP) by different instruments.
| Instrument | V2 accuracy | CP accuracy | Ref. |
|
|
|||
| VEGA/CHARA | 1−2% | – | 1 |
| FLUOR/CHARA | 0.3% | – | 2 |
| JouFLU/CHARA | 0.1% * | – | 3 |
| 1% | – | 4 | |
| VISION/NPOI | 5−20% ** | 1−10° | 5 |
| CLIMB/CHARA | 5% | 0.1° | 6 |
| CLASSIC/CHARA | 5% | – | 7 |
| PAVO/CHARA | ~ 5% | 5° | 8 |
| MIRC/CHARA | ~ 2% | < 1° | 9 |
| – | 0.1−0.2° | 10, 11, 12 | |
| AMBER/VLTI | – | 0.20−0.37° | 13 |
| PIONIER/VLTI | – | 0.25−3° | 14 |
| 3−15% | 0.5° | 15 | |
| GRAVITY/VLTI | – | 1° | 16 |
| MATISSE/VLTI | 1.6−2.3% | < 1.16° | 17 |
Notes.
Reference. 1Mourard et al. (2009); 2Coudé du Foresto et al. (2003); 3Scott et al. (2013); 4Lhomé et al. (2012); 5Garcia et al. (2014), evolving to accuracies of <10% and <5° in V2 and CP (E. Garcia, priv. comm.); 6ten Brummelaar et al. (2012); 7McAlister et al. (2012); 8Maestro et al. (2012); 9Che et al. (2012); 10Zhao et al. (2011); 11Zhao et al. (2010); 12Zhao et al. (2008); 13Absil et al. (2010); 14Absil et al. (2011); 15Le Bouquin et al. (2011); 16 (Chiavassa et al. 2014, Final Design Review 2011, priv. comm.); 17Lopez (2012).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.