Table 2
Model settings for Figs. 2–4 based on regular and turbulent magnetic field configurations in the disk and halo.
Disk | Halo | |||||
|
||||||
Reg. | Iso. | Aniso. | Reg. | Iso. | Aniso. | |
|
||||||
DH | √ | √ | ||||
DIH | √ | √ | √ | |||
DAH | √ | √ | √ | |||
DAIH | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DHI | √ | √ | √ | |||
DHA | √ | √ | √ | |||
DHAI | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DIHI | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DIHI ■ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DIHA | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DAHI | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DAHA | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DIHAI | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
DAHAI | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
DAIHI | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
DAIHA | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |
DAIHAI | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
|
||||||
D | √ | |||||
DI | √ | √ | ||||
DI ★ | √ | √ | ||||
DI ■★ | √ | √ | ||||
DA | √ | √ | ||||
DA ★ | √ | √ | ||||
DAI | √ | √ | √ | |||
DAI ★ | √ | √ | √ | |||
DhI | √ | √ | ||||
DIhI | √ | √ | √ | |||
DIhI ■ | √ | √ | √ | |||
DIhI ★ | √ | √ | √ | |||
DIhI ■★ | √ | √ | √ | |||
DAhI | √ | √ | √ | |||
DAhI ★ | √ | √ | √ | |||
DAIhI | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
DAIhI ★ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Notes. The three column headings below the principle headings of the “Disk” and “Halo” denote the regular, isotropic turbulent, and anisotropic turbulent magnetic fields. The rows contain a listing of all model types simulated with the following nomenclature: “D” denotes disk magnetic fields, “H” and “h” both denote halo magnetic fields, “I” and “A” are the isotropic and anisotropic turbulent magnetic fields, ■ represents the use of the λ 3.5 cm observations to gauge the wavelength-independent effects, and ★ denotes the use of the generalized opaque-layer approximation to describe the contribution of IFD (in the disk) to depolarization, as detailed in Sect. 6.1. Upper case letters “D” and “H” and the lower case “h” are used to distinguish between the presence or absence of a regular magnetic field in a given layer, respectively. The row ordering follows the model type order as in the legend of Figs. 2 and 3 for the top panel and that of Fig. 4 for the bottom panel.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.