Table 2
Best fit of the XIS data between 3 and 10 keV with a simple power law, a power-law + gaussian line and a power-law + Laor profile emission line.
Power law | |||||||
Obs. | Γ | F3−10 keV | L3 − 10 keV/LEdd | χ2/d.o.f. | |||
(×10-10 erg cm-2 s-1) | (%) | ||||||
|
|||||||
1 | 1.72 ± 0.01 | 3.35 | 0.188 | 429/254 | |||
2 | 1.56 ± 0.01 | 2.05 | 0.115 | 303/254 | |||
3 | 1.53 ± 0.02 | 0.89 | 0.050 | 297/251 | |||
4 | 1.53 ± 0.02 | 0.66 | 0.037 | 314/245 | |||
5 | 1.57 ± 0.02 | 0.47 | 0.026 | 220/219 | |||
|
|||||||
2008 | 1.52 ± 0.01 | 0.44 | 0.024 | 435/254 | |||
|
|||||||
Power law+Gauss | |||||||
Obs. | Γ | E gauss | σ gauss | F gauss | EW | χ2/d.o.f. | |
(keV) | (keV) | (×10-4ph cm-2 s-1) | (eV) | ||||
|
|||||||
1 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 6.40 ± 0.10 | 0.66 ± 0.13 | 6.5![]() |
150![]() |
285/251 | |
2 | 1.60 ± 0.02 | 6.49 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.13 | 1.5![]() |
55![]() |
267/251 | |
3 | 1.57 ± 0.02 | 6.77 ± 0.13 | 0.36 ± 0.11 | 1.0![]() |
90![]() |
263/248 | |
4 | 1.56 ± 0.03 | 6.42 ± 0.20 | 0.36 ± 0.22 | 0.5![]() |
60![]() |
300/242 | |
5 | 1.62 ± 0.06 | 6.59 ± 0.30 | 0.60 ± 0.51 | 0.7![]() |
130![]() |
207/216 | |
|
|||||||
2008 | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 6.41 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.03 | 0.4![]() |
65![]() |
248/251 | |
|
|||||||
Power law+Laor | |||||||
Obs. | Γ | E laor | R in | F laor | EW | χ2/d.o.f. | |
(keV) | (Rg) | (×10-4ph cm-2 s-1) | (eV) | ||||
|
|||||||
1 | 1.80![]() |
7.00![]() |
5.0![]() |
6.0![]() |
160![]() |
286/250 | |
2 | 1.60![]() |
6.84![]() |
6.3![]() |
1.9![]() |
80![]() |
266/250 | |
3 | 1.58![]() |
7.06![]() |
<35 | 1.3![]() |
140![]() |
260/247 | |
4 | 1.56![]() |
6.82![]() |
<180 | 0.7![]() |
90![]() |
300/241 | |
5 | 1.61![]() |
7.03![]() |
<25 | 0.7![]() |
120![]() |
207/215 | |
|
|||||||
2008 | 1.54![]() |
6.43![]() |
>100 | 0.38![]() |
65![]() |
248/251 | |
Notes. In the last case, the five XIS spectra have been fitted simultaneously, letting all the parameters free to vary but imposing the Laor profile inclination angle to be the same between the five models. The best-fit value for the inclination angle is deg. The errors on the inner disk radius Rin of the Laor profile correspond to a confidence level of 90% for two parameters. We have also reported the best fit parameter values for the 2008 Suzaku observation, again assuming the same inclination angle as the five other Suzaku observations. With the addition of these data, the best-fit value for the inclination angle then becomes
deg. To compute the 3−10 keV flux in Eddington units, we adopt an Eddington luminosity of LEdd ≃ 1.3 × 1039 erg s-1 (i.e. we assume a ten-solar-mass black hole) and a distance to GX 339-4 of 8 kpc.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.