Free Access

Table 3

Comparing ESS scaling exponents Zp, p = 1 to p = 5, following Table 4 in Schmidt et al. (2009).

p 1 2 3 4 5

This work, “full in” case () 0.41–0.46 0.73–0.80 1.00 1.12–1.23 1.19–1.50
This work, “full in” case () 0.43–0.53 0.75–0.82 1.00 1.13–1.23 1.23–1.45
This work, perpendicular LOS () 0.42–0.51 0.75–0.81 1.00 1.14–1.20 1.27–1.40
This work, parallel LOS () 0.38–0.43 0.71–0.77 1.00 1.18–1.27 1.38–1.54
BNP02 (MHD 5003) 0.42 0.74 1.00 1.20 1.38
KNPW07 (HD 10243) 0.43 0.76 1.00
SFHKN09 (HD 7683) 0.52 0.83 1.00 1.09 1.14
K41 0.33 0.67 1.00 1.33 1.67
SL94 (C = 2) 0.36 0.70 1.00 1.28 1.54
B02 (C = 1) 0.42 0.74 1.00 1.21 1.40

Notes. Listed are values from this work, for longitudinal () and transverse () structure functions, simulation data by Boldyrev et al. (2002a, BNP02), Kritsuk et al. (2007a, KNPW07), Schmidt et al. (2009, SFHKN09), and theoretical values by Kolmogorov (1941, K41), She & Leveque (1994, SL94), Boldyrev (2002, B02).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.