Free Access

Table 4

Disk models for selected members, according to their disk structure.

Object T eff R M M disk aminamax HRdisk/Rdisk T(Rin) Comments/model reference in plots
(K) (R) (M) (M) ( μm) (K)

Full-disks
213659108 4330 1.49 1.0 0.08 0.1−100 0.12 1500 Very massive, rich in small dust (bold line)
213751210 3955 0.80 0.7 2.4E − 5 0.1−10 000 0.25 1500 Very low-mass, maybe smaller radius? (bold line)
213823950 3729 0.92 0.6 2.9E − 4 0.1−100 0.15 1500 Normal-to-low disk mass, mass depends on grain size (bold line)
3729 0.92 0.6 2.4E − 3 0.1−10 000 0.15 1500 Normal-to-low disk mass, mass depends on grain size (dashed line)
PTD
213658737 3500 1.40 0.3 3.0E − 3 0.1−100 0.13/0.22 1500/120 Less flared, less dense inner disk (bold line)
213734649 3720 1.00 0.45 4.5E − 4 0.1−2/0.1−100 0.15/0.20 1500/300 Change in grain distribution inner/outer disk (bold line)
3720 1.00 0.45 4.5E − 4 0.1−100 0.16 1500 Cannot fit mid-IR and near-IR properly (dashed line)
213929250 3720 1.00 0.40 2.0E − 4 0.1−2/0.1−100 0.16/0.18 1500/400 Radial change in grain size and vertical scale height (bold line)
213929408 4060 1.15 0.80 8.0E − 4 0.1−2/0.1−100 0.13/0.12 1500/200 Optically thin, small-grain inner disk (bold line)
213945201 4060 1.40 0.80 0.04 0.1−100 0.07 1500 An extreme attempt to fit with a uniform disk model (dashed line)
4060 1.40 0.80 6.4E − 4 0.1−100 hydro 1500/200 Needs more flaring in inner part (dotted line)
4060 1.40 0.80 4.8E − 4 0.1−100 0.13/0.11 1500/200 Best with puffed inner disk (bold line)
213954058 3960 1.10 0.80 4.0E − 4 0.1−100 0.14/0.23 1500/150 Needs a thin inner disk and a thick, flared outer disk (bold line)
TD
213633647 5165 2.90 2.00 4.0E − 6 20−1000 0.32/hydro 500 No small dust, inner hole (dashed line)
5165 2.90 2.00 9.6E − 8 0.1−100 0.32 500 Small grains, lower mass, silicate feature (bold line)
213735713 3580 1.10 0.35 7.0E − 5 0.1−10 000 0.20 250 Low mass, low T(Rin), high vertical scale height (bold line)
213756779 3650 0.75 0.40 1.6E − 5 0.1−10 000 0.15 350 Low mass, inner hole (bold line)
3650 0.75 0.40 1.2E − 4 20−10 000 0.08 1500 Low scale height, large grains, no hole, too much near-IR excess (dashed line)
213914837 3850 1.05 0.50 2.5E − 7 0.1−100 0.06 1500 Small grains, very low mass, overpredicts 8−12 μm excess (bold line)
3850 1.05 0.50 4.0E − 6 20−1000 0.06 1500 No small grains, better fit to 8−12 μm but still high (dashed line)
3850 1.05 0.50 3.0E − 6 20−1000 0.06 800 Best fit includes small hole (dotted line)
Depleted
213733557 3700 0.80 0.50 1.5E − 6 0.1−100 0.12 1500 Without strong grain growth, very low mass (bold line)
3700 0.80 0.50 1.5E − 5 0.1−10 000 0.12 1500 Larger grain size, higher mass, but still depleted (dotted line)
213854760 3720 1.90 0.40 8.0E − 5 20−1000 0.06 1500 Too much 8−12 μm excess (bold line)
3720 1.90 0.40 2.0E − 6 0.1−100 0.05 1500 Extremely low vertical scale height underpredits 24 μm (dashed line)
3720 1.90 0.40 8.0E − 5 20−1000 hydro 1500 Hydrostatic equilibrium overpredicts 8−12 μm excess (dotted line)
213930129 3785 1.69 0.70 7.0E − 4 0.1−100 0.05 1500 Very settled disk with small grains (bold line)
3785 1.69 0.70 5.6E − 6 0.1−100 0.08 1500 Lower mass disk, close to hydrostatic equilibrium (dashed line)
3785 1.69 0.70 4.9E − 6 0.1−100 hydro 1500 Hydrostatic equilibrium, lower disk mass (dotted line)
213944898 3500 1.21 0.26 1.3E − 5 0.1−100 0.08 1500 Very settled disk with low mass still has too much mid-IR excess (dashed line)
3500 1.21 0.26 3.9E − 6 0.1−100 0.10 1500 Lower mass, higher vertical scale height (bold line)
3500 1.21 0.26 3.9E − 5 0.1−10 000 0.10 1500 If strong grain growth is assumed, the mass may be higher (black dotted line)

Notes. The comments also include a reference to the models plotted in the figures. RADMC disk models for selected members with different disk structures (normal full-disks, pre-transitional disks [PTD], transitional disks [TD], and dust-depleted disks [Depleted]). The names of the objects have been shortened to fit the table. The stellar parameters (Teff, R) are determined from the optical observations and spectroscopy. The disk parameters are modified to reproduce the observed SED in the whole wavelength range, starting with the simplest possible model (see Sect. 4.2). The disk masses are estimated assuming a gas-to-dust ratio of 100 and a collisional distribution for the dust with grain sizes aminamax. The outer disk radius is taken to be 100 in all cases. A larger radius would also result in a larger dust mass. For pre-transitional disks with physically different inner and outer disks, we give the grain distributions, vertical scale height, and inner rim temperature for both the inner and the outer disk. In case of different models, the comments include a reference to the appropriate figure.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.