Table 4
Scalar product of the preferred axes of the quadrupole and octopole (
), its corresponding separation (°), and the probability (%) of having such a low separation.
| Map |
|
Separation (°) | Prob (%) | |||
|
|
||||||
| TOH | 0.9856 | 9.7 | 1.4 | |||
| W3 | 0.9992 | 2.3 | 0.084 | |||
| W5 | 0.9963 | 4.9 | 0.37 | |||
| W7 | 0.9966 | 4.7 | 0.34 | |||
| W9 | 0.9948 | 5.8 | 0.52 | |||
| TOH (inp) | 0.9808 | 11.2 | 1.9 | |||
| W3 (inp) | 0.9780 | 12.0 | 2.2 | |||
| W5 (inp) | 0.9829 | 10.6 | 1.7 | |||
| W5 Dela (inp) | 0.9514 | 17.9 | 4.9 | |||
| W7 (inp) | 0.9693 | 14.2 | 3.1 | |||
| W9 (inp) | 0.9726 | 13.4 | 2.7 | |||
|
|
||||||
| After ISW | ||||||
| subtraction | ||||||
| (2MASS + NVSS) | ||||||
| TOH − ISW | 0.9113 | 24.3 | 8.9 | |||
| W3 − ISW | 0.9535 | 17.5 | 4.6 | |||
| W5 − ISW | 0.9381 | 20.3 | 6.2 | |||
| W7 − ISW | 0.9414 | 19.7 | 5.9 | |||
| W9 − ISW | 0.9260 | 22.2 | 7.4 | |||
| TOH (inp) − ISW | 0.8566 | 31.1 | 14.3 | |||
| W3 (inp) − ISW | 0.9048 | 25.2 | 9.5 | |||
| W5 (inp) − ISW | 0.9095 | 24.6 | 9.1 | |||
| W5 Dela (inp) − ISW | 0.9263 | 22.1 | 7.4 | |||
| W7 (inp) − ISW | 0.9153 | 23.8 | 8.5 | |||
| W9 (inp) − ISW | 0.9088 | 24.7 | 9.1 | |||
|
|
||||||
| W3 − ISW | ||||||
| 2MASS only | 0.7548 | 41.0 | 24.5 | |||
| FP10 | ||||||
Notes. The theoretically allowed range is [0° − 90°] since the axes are not vectors. The results are compared with those of FP10 (Francis & Peacock 2010, bottom row).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.