Free Access

Table 1

Overview of simulations performed.

Run label Comparison τ Radiation transport T)max [%]

Pa-1e-1-grayRT+FLD Pascucci et al. 10-1 gray RT + FLD 3
Pa-1e-1-freqRT+FLD freq. RT + FLD 3
Pa-1e-1-FLD FLD 55
Pa-1e-1-MC Monte-Carlo 1

Pa-1e+2-grayRT+FLD Pascucci et al. 10+ 2 gray RT + FLD 54
Pa-1e+2-freqRT+FLD freq. RT + FLD 16
Pa-1e+2-FLD FLD 42
Pa-1e+2-MC Monte-Carlo 14

Pi-1e+3-grayRT+FLD Pinte et al. 10+ 3 gray RT + FLD 48
Pi-1e+3-freqRT+FLD freq. RT + FLD 48
Pi-1e+3-FLD FLD 282
Pi-1e+3-MC Monte-Carlo 19

Pi-1e+4-grayRT+FLD Pinte et al. 10+ 4 gray RT + FLD 46
Pi-1e+4-freqRT+FLD freq. RT + FLD 46
Pi-1e+4-FLD FLD 284
Pi-1e+4-MC Monte-Carlo

Pi-1e+6-grayRT+FLD Pinte et al. 10+6 gray RT + FLD 37
Pi-1e+6-freqRT+FLD freq. RT + FLD 37
Pi-1e+6-FLD FLD 289
Pi-1e+6-MC Monte-Carlo 42

Notes.The columns denote the run label, the reference to the original benchmark test (either Pascucci et al. 2004 or Pinte et al. 2009), the optical depth of the disk’s midplane (either τ550 nm or τ810 nm, respectively), the radiation transport method used in the simulation, and the resulting temperature deviation in percent. The deviations are computed with respect to the Monte-Carlo solution by RADMC. The temperature deviations given for the Monte-Carlo runs are taken from Pascucci et al. (2004), Figs. 4 and 5, or Pinte et al. (2009), Fig. 10, with respect to the deviation to the other radiation transport codes participating in the original benchmark tests. A visualization of the final maximum temperature deviations as a function of optical depth is given in Fig. 8.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.