Multiple planets or exomoons in Kepler hot Jupiter systems with transit timing variations?

Home

All issues

Volume 553 (May 2013)

A&A, 553 (2013) A17

Full HTML

Free Access

Table A.1

Rejected periodic TTV detections in our Kepler hot-Jupiter candidate sample.

KOI	R / R_E	P (d)	M _∗	T _eff	R _∗	TTV per. (d)	Amp. (d)	Sign. lev. (s.t.d.)	Remarks

412.01	6.72	4.1470197	1.09	5584	1.17	8.29	> 1.4544	> 4.1	rot, 1
822.01	9.79	7.9193704	1	5458	0.74	24.523629	1.7424	7.4	rot
895.01	10.51	4.4094114	1.04	5436	0.93	11.436544	0.432	5.1	rot
1003.01	10.84	8.3605703	0.96	5126	0.8	277.700639	2.9808	9.6	FP, EB, 2
1152.01	15.97	4.7222521	0.58	4069	0.55	20.868549	0.7056	9.9	FP, EB, 2
						11.810977	0.5616	7.5
1285.01	6.36	0.9374439	0.98	5278	0.83	374.812594	5.8608	65.1	FP
						106.826193	1.9440	20.3
						162.786912	1.4976	15.2
						53.455926	0.5616	4.5
						70.229651	0.5472	4.3
1382.01	22.64	4.2023359	1.1	5921	1.07	34.449497	1.4688	17.8	FP
						17.397961	0.9792	11.3
1452.01	22.39	1.1522169	1.27	6834	1.76	30.290180	2.1312	37.6	EB, 3
						6.308352	1.8144	31.7
						4.802105	1.2960	22.1
						74.432453	1.2672	21.6
						144.927536	1.1952	20.3
						44.359668	0.5328	8.1
						58.309038	0.5184	7.8
						192.864031	0.4608	6.7
						50.584248	0.4320	6.2
1448.01	24.25	2.4865874	1.08	5658	1.17	11.177805	0.9360	8.4	FP
1540.01	31.64	1.2078535	1	5390	0.77	390.015601	0.6192	9.5	FP, EB, 2
						55.962841	0.5904	8.9
						2.426855	0.5904	8.9
						44.640864	0.5472	8.1
						2.485046	0.4176	5.8
						32.99894	0.3888	5.3
1543.01	13.69	3.9643337	1.06	5821	0.87	96.99321	0.4464	9.1	FP
1546.01	9.92	0.9175471	0.93	5505	0.86	141.74344	5.3136	77.6	EB, 3
						62.63702	2.7648	39.5
						357.90981	2.2752	32.2
						74.32181	1.4976	20.6
						230.36167	1.4544	20.0
						107.71219	1.3968	19.1
						44.161809	0.9216	12.0
						55.694793	0.6912	8.6
						33.392326	0.6480	7.9
						86.625087	0.5472	6.4
						36.549708	0.4896	5.5
						10.897400	0.4464	4.9
						21.113973	0.4176	4.5

Notes. The vetting was based either on nongravitational processes at work (e.g. stellar rotation) that affect the transit time determination or on the reported improved status (false positive and/or eclipsing binary) of the candidates. Periods in italics are ambiguous, based on the analysis of the stellar optical light curves of the candidates. Stroboscopic periods are omitted. In the last column we refer to the cause of rejection FP: a false positive based on the 2013 January updated release of Kepler Objects of Interest. (1) The peak close to the Nyquist-freq., i.e. 2 P_orb. (2) Classified as eclipsing binary by Ofir & Dreizler (2013). (3) Classified as eclipsing binary by Mazeh et al. (2013).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.