Free Access

Table 9

Observed, using a bisector and weighted least-squares fit, and literature PL relations in the LMC.

Relation Bisector wLSQ Remarks

Observed K-band 16.01  ±  0.05 15.99  ±  0.04 Correction van der Marel & Cioni (2001)
–3.20  ±  0.04 –3.19  ±  0.04
Observed K-band 16.03  ±  0.05 16.02  ±  0.04 Correction Nikolaev et al. (2004)
–3.22  ±  0.04 –3.21  ±  0.04
Observed K-band 16.06  ±  0.04 16.05  ±  0.03 No correction
–3.25  ±  0.03 –3.24  ±  0.03
Literature K-band 15.996  ±  0.010 Ngeow et al. (2009)
–3.194  ±  0.015
Literature K-band 16.070  ±  0.017 Ripepi et al. (2012)
–3.295  ±  0.018
Observed V-band 17.15  ±  0.08 17.09  ±  0.07 Correction van der Marel & Cioni (2001)
–2.67  ±  0.07 –2.62  ±  0.07
Observed V-band 17.18  ±  0.07 17.13  ±  0.07 Correction Nikolaev et al. (2004)
–2.69  ±  0.06 –2.65  ±  0.06
Observed V-band 17.21  ±  0.07 17.16  ±  0.07 No correction
–2.72  ±  0.06 –2.68  ±  0.06
Literature V-band 17.115  ±  0.015 Ngeow et al. (2009)
–2.769  ±  0.023
Literature V-band –1.304  ±  0.065 Turner et al. (2010)
–2.786  ±  0.075
Observed W(VK) 15.86  ±  0.05 15.85  ±  0.04 Correction van der Marel & Cioni (2001)
–3.27  ±  0.04 –3.26  ±  0.04
Observed W(VK) 15.88  ±  0.04 15.87  ±  0.04 Correction Nikolaev et al. (2004)
–3.30  ±  0.04 –3.29  ±  0.04
Observed W(VK) 15.91  ±  0.03 15.91  ±  0.03 No correction
–3.32  ±  0.03 -3.32  ±  0.03
Literature W(VK) 15.901  ±  0.005 Inno et al. (2012)
–3.326  ±  0.008
Literature W(VK) 15.870  ±  0.013 Ripepi et al. (2012)
–3.325  ±  0.014

Notes. The zero point is listed in the first line, the slope in the second line.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.