Table 3
Main results obtained from the analysis of the X-ray spectra of all AGN present in the sample.
Source | N Hgal | Γ + | N H | χ2/ν | F (2−10) keV | F (20−100) keV |
× 1022 cm-2 | × 1022 cm-2 | × 10-11 erg s-1 cm-2 | × 10-11 erg s-1 cm-2 | |||
|
||||||
PBC J0041.6+2534 A | 0.038 |
![]() |
![]() |
6.2/7 | 0.02 | 1.0 |
PBC J0100.6−4752A | 0.019 |
![]() |
![]() |
4.3/11 | 0.28 | 0.6 |
PBC J0122.3+5004A | 0.136 |
![]() |
44![]() |
1.9/3 | 0.09 | 0.6 |
PBC J0140.4−5320A | 0.026 |
![]() |
![]() |
28.7/26 | 0.50 | 0.7 |
PBC J0248.9+2627 | 0.103 | [1.8] |
![]() |
3.6/3 | 0.40 | 1.2 |
PBC J0353.5+3713A | 0.168 |
![]() |
![]() |
13.2/14 | 0.35 | 0.8 |
PBC J0356.9−4040A | 0.019 |
![]() |
![]() |
25.9/38 | 0.74 | 1.1 |
PBC J0503.0+2300 | 0.226 |
![]() |
![]() |
148.6/149 | 1.25 | 1.1 |
PBC J0543.6−2738A | 0.022 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.3/8 | 0.47 | 1.1 |
PBC J0544.3+5905 | 0.158 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.3/18 | 0.47 | 1.1 |
PBC J0623.8−3212B | 0.038 | [1.8] |
![]() |
3.3/2 | 0.07 | 1.5 |
PBC J0641.3+3251A | 0.159 |
![]() |
![]() |
14.5/16 | 0.29 | 1.0 |
PBC J0759.9+2324 | 0.047 |
![]() |
![]() |
9/10 | 0.44 | 1.3 |
PBC J0814.4+0421 | 0.032 |
![]() |
![]() |
9.3/15 | 0.50 | 1.1 |
PBC J0919.9+3712 C1 | 0.011 |
![]() |
![]() |
326.9/328 | 0.36 | 1.2 |
PBC J0954.8+3724∗ | 0.014 | [1.8] |
![]() |
2.4/2 | 0.15 | 0.4 |
PBC J1246.9+5432 D | 0.014 |
![]() |
![]() |
15/22 | 0.09 | 1.5 |
PBC J1335.8+0301 A | 0.019 |
![]() |
![]() |
313.3/299 | 0.64 | 1.1 |
PBC J1344.2+1934 | 0.017 | [1.8] | 38![]() |
2/4 | 0.10 | 0.9 |
PBC J1345.4+4141A | 0.009 |
![]() |
![]() |
10.4/25 | 0.74 | 0.7 |
PBC J1439.0+1413A | 0.014 | [1.8] |
![]() |
12/8 | 0.32 | 0.5 |
PBC J1453.0+2553 | 0.033 |
![]() |
– | 73.8/87 | 1.06 | 1.0 |
PBC J1506.6+0349 | 0.037 |
![]() |
![]() |
14/19 | 0.42 | 0.7 |
PBC J1546.5+6931∗ | 0.031 | [1.8] | 16![]() |
3.3/2 | 0.08 | 0.5 |
PBC J1620.3+8101 | 0.046 | [1.8] |
![]() |
9.6/13 | 0.54 | 0.7 |
PBC J2148.2−3455 | 0.019 | [1.8] | – | 6/11 | 0.04 | 0.9 |
PBC J2333.9−2343 | 0.016 |
![]() |
– | 97/104 | 0.80 | 0.7 |
PBC J2341.9+3036 C2 | 0.058 |
![]() |
![]() |
25/28 | 0.11 | 1.0 |
Notes.
Best-fit model requires an extra power-law component, having the same photon index as the primary absorbed power-law and passing only through the galactic column density (wagal*(po+wa*po) in xspec terminology).
Best-fit model requires an extra black-body component with
keV (wagal*(bb+wa*po) in xspec terminology).
Best-fit model requires an extra power-law component, having the same photon index
as the primary absorbed power-law and passing only through the Galactic column
density plus a narrow line at keV
with
eV (wagal*(po+wa*(po+ga)) in xspec terminology).
Best-fit model requires a black-body component with a
keV
and two narrow lines at
keV
and
keV
with an EW of
eV and
eV, respectively (wagal*(bb+wa*(po+ga+ga)) in xspec terminology).
Best-fit model requires a second power-law component, having the same photon index
as the primary absorbed power-law and passing only through the Galactic column
density plus a narrow line with
and
eV (wagal*(po+wa*(po+ga)) in xspec terminology).
In bold face, we indicate sources for which we performed an X-ray data analysis using XMM-Newton observations.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.