Highlight
Free Access

Table 2

Model fits to IRC+10216’s 43.3 GHz brightness distribution.

Restoring beam Deconvolved source
M θ B,maj θ B,min PA(B) θ S,maj θ S,min PA(S) S p S
(mas) (mas) (°, E of N) (mas) (mas) (°, E of N) (mJy beam-1) (mJy)

Imaging with natural weighting – Gaussian model
J 61 49 −6.3 60 ± 2 54 ± 2  +34 ± 17 6.22 ± 0.07 13.1 ± 0.2
13.1 ± 0.2 2630
Imaging with uniform weighting – Gaussian model
J 44 39 −6.8 63 ± 2 57 ± 2 4.30 ± 0.09 13.2 ± 0.4
13.3 ± 0.3 2450
Visibility versus uv-distance – Gaussian modeling
O 61 ± 1 55 ± 3  +31 ± 13 12.8 ± 0.2
L 56 ± 2 12.6 ± 0.3
Visibility versus uv-distance – uniform disk modeling
O 87 ± 2 80 ± 1  +22 ± 5 12.2 ± 0.1
L 83 ± 1 12.1 ± 0.2

Notes. The first four lines give results of Gaussian fitting, line 1 and 2 to a naturally weighted image and a uniformly weighted image, line 3 and 4 to visibility domain data. Lines 5 and 6 give the results for fits with a uniform disk model. The first column denotes the method (M) used: J for JMFIT and O for OMFIT (AIPS tasks). L stand for our independent least-squares program. For the first two lines, the second to forth columns give the FWHM major and minor axes and the position angle of the restoring beam determined by IMAGR, while the fifth to seventh columns list the same quantities for IRC+10216’s brightness distribution and the eighth column gives fitted peak brightness. For all fits, the ninth gives the integrated flux density (the “zero spacing” flux). JMFIT and OMFIT fitted elliptical brightness models, whereas our least squares program used a circular model.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.