Free Access

Table 4

Detailed comparison between AGNs and non-AGNs by separately considering PACS detected and undetected sources.

GOODS COSMOS
z (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) (3)

Total sample

0.5–0.8 77% 0.28 ± 0.04 3.87 ± 1.00 64% 0.43 ± 0.06 2.27 ± 1.00
0.8–1.5 1% 0.38 ± 0.06 2.02 ± 0.99 18% 0.22 ± 0.06 3.28 ± 1.02
1.5–2.5 82%  −0.13 ± 0.04 1.76 ± 1.00 36% 0.28 ± 0.04 10.17 ± 1.30

Low-LX subsample

0.5–0.8 76% 0.22 ± 0.04 7.26 ± 1.29 99% 0.23 ± 0.05 1.90 ± 1.03
0.8–1.5 1% 0.39 ± 0.05 1.71 ± 0.98 83% 0.17 ± 0.08 3.78 ± 1.06
1.5–2.5 59%  −0.14 ± 0.05 1.44 ± 1.39 31%  −0.08 ± 0.08 4.38 ± 1.41

Notes. Columns: (1) probability, according to a Kolmogorov Smirnov test, that the log (νLν(60   μm)) distributions of PACS detected AGNs and non-AGNs are consistent with describing the same population; (2) average offset between the stacked log (νLν(60   μm)) for PACS undetected AGNs and non-AGN; (3) ratio of PACS detection rates of AGNs and non-AGNs. The upper table refers to the low luminosity subsample (upper panel of Fig. 6), whereas the lower table represents the total sample (lower panel of Fig. 6).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.