This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117056e]
MH2 vs. LB for the redshift-limited CO sample (n = 173), including all morphological types, and for groups of different morphological types. The dashed line gives the best fit bisector (derived with ASURV) for all morphological types and the solid line is the best fit for the T = 3–5 sample.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.