Free Access

Fig. 6

thumbnail

Left: the relationship between Eddington fraction and black hole mass contrasting QSOs in our sub-mm sample (filled circles plotted with their 1σ errors) to the QSO samples of Shemmer et al. (2004, triangles) and Netzer et al. (2007, squares). Quantities for the latter two samples were recalculated using the scaling relations and cosmology used in this work, and smaller symbols are used for QSOs with redshifts  >2.5. The thin and thick arrows show the typical shift of the Shemmer et al. (2004) and Netzer et al. (2007) points, respectively, if the QSO black hole masses are calculated via the equations used by these authors. Right: as in the left panel, but only for QSOs in our sub-mm sample and in the case that only the very broad (VBLR) Hα component is used in the black hole mass estimation.

This figure is made of several images, please see below:

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.