EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 520 (September-October 2010) A&A, 520 (2010) A57 Full HTML
Free Access

 

 

Table 6:

Fe II lines in the 3800-8000 Å region with $\log~gf$ $\ge $ -1.5 and 3d6(3P)4f energy levels as upper levels.

Upper level 		Lower level $\lambda$(calc) $\log~gf$ $\lambda$(obs) Notes

cm-1 		    J cm-1   Å KUR Å  

122 351.810 		(3P)4f 2[5] 11/2 103 165.320 (3P)4d 4F9/2 5210.550 +0.795 5210.55 good agreement
        103 683.070 (5D)5d 4F9/2 5355.059 +0.164 5355.06 computed too strong
        103 771.320 (3H)4d 4G9/2 5380.493 -1.047   at the noise level
        104 807.210 (3H)4d 2G9/2 5698.178 -0.539   blend with a telluric line
        104 916.550 (3H)4d 4F9/2 5733.913 -0.635 5733.90 computed too weak
        106 722.170 (3F)4d 4F9/2 6396.332 -0.741 6396.32 computed too weak
        109 811.920 (3G)4d 4F9/2 7972.359 -0.985   at the noise level
122 324.142 (3P)4f 2[5] 9/2 103 102.860 (3P)4d 4D7/2 5201.118 -0.056   wrong,not observed
        103 191.917 (3P)4d 2F7/2 5225.329 +0.634   blend, good agreement
        103 986.330 (3H)4d 4H7/2 5451.698 -1.133   blend, good agreement
        104 107.950 (3P)4d 4F7/2 5488.097 -0.362   blend, good agreement
        104 481.590 (3H)4d 2F7/2 5603.024 -0.170 5603.05  
        105 123.000 (3H)4d 2G7/2 5811.956 -1.441   blend,good agreement
        105 775.491 (3F)4d 2F7/2 6041.116 -0.837 6041.1 weak,good agreement
122 355.116 (3P)4f 2[4] 9/2 102 394.718 (5D)6s 4D7/2 5008.523 -0.809   weak, computed too strong
        103 102.860 (3P)4d 4D7/2 5192.750 +0.657 5192.75 lab, good agreement
        103 165.320 (3P)4d 4F9/2 5209.652 -0.035 5209.66 lab, good agreement
        103 191.917 (3P)4d 2F7/2 5216.883 -0.404   blend
        103 683.070 (5D)5d 4F9/2 5354.110 -0.637 5354.1 weak
        104 107.950 (3P)4d 4F7/2 5478.781 -1.319   at the continuum level
        104 807.210 (3H)4d 2G9/2 5697.105 -1.443   at the continuum level
        106 767.210 (3F)4d 4F7/2 6413.457 -1.407   blend
122 355.550 (3P)4f 2[4] 7/2 102 394.718 (5D)6s 4D7/2 5008.414 -1.258   good agreement
        102 802.312 (5D)6s 4D5/2 5112.818 -0.959 5112.82 computed too weak
        103 002.670 (3P)4d 4D5/2 5165.751 +0.441 5165.75 lab, good agreement
        103 102.860 (3P)4d 4D7/2 5192.633 +0.155 5192.62 lab, computed too weak
        103 165.320 (3P)4d 4F9/2 5209.534 -1.105   blend, good agreement
        103 191.917 (3P)4d 2F7/2 5216.765 -0.764   blend
        106 796.660 (3F)4d 4P5/2 6425.418 -1.436   at the continuum level
122 351.488 (3P)4f 2[3] 7/2 103 102.860 (3P)4d 4D7/2 5193.729 -1.320   blend
        103 191.917 (3P)4d 2F7/2 5217.871 -0.250 5217.870 lab
        103 597.402 (3P)4d 2D5/2 5330.689 +0.525 5330.680 lab
        104 023.910 (3H)4d 4G5/2 5454.742 -1.327   at the continuum level
        104 107.950 (3P)4d 4F7/2 5479.870 -1.320   at the continuum level
        104 481.590 (3H)4d 2F7/2 5594.450 -1.116 5594.42 computed too weak?
        104 569.230 (3P)4d 4F5/2 5622.022 -0.573 5622.02 computed too weak?
        105 234.237 (3H)4d 4F5/2 5840.440 -1.282   at the continuum level
        107 407.800 (3F)4d 2D5/2 6689.941 -0.330 6689.91  
123 629.520 (3P)4f 1[4] 9/2 103 102.860 (3P)4d 4D7/2 4870.353 -1.402   at the continuum level
        104 000.810 (5D)5d 6P7/2 5093.159 -0.981   blend
        104 107.950 (3P)4d 4F7/2 5121.112 +0.327 5121.1 lab, good agreement
        104 481.590 (3H)4d 2F7/2 5221.043 +0.408 5221.04 lab, good agreement
        104 873.230 (5D)5d 4D7/2 5330.062 -1.183   blend
        104 993.860 (3F)4d 4D7/2 5364.564 -0.118 5364.55 computed too strong
        105 123.000 (3H)4d 2G7/2 5401.999 -0.418   blend
        105 220.600 (3H)4d 4F7/2 5430.640 -1.066 5430.64 computed too weak
        105 775.491 (3F)4d 2F7/2 5599.422 -0.624 5599.42 good agreement
        106 767.210 (3F)4d 4F7/2 5928.743 -0.677 5928.72 at the noise level
        110 167.280 (3G)4d 4F7/2 7426.139 -1.173    

123 637.833

 (3P)4f 1[4] 7/2 102 802.312 (5D)6s 4D5/2 4798.155 -1.297   at the continuum level
        103 002.670 (3P)4d 4D5/2 4844.743 -0.954   computed too strong
        103 597.402 (3P)4d 2D5/2 4988.521 -0.339 4988.51 lab
        104 107.950 (3P)4d 4F7/2 5118.932 -0.819 5118.95 lab, computed too weak
        104 120.270 (5D)5d 6P5/2 5122.163 -1.282    
        104 481.590 (3H)4d 2F7/2 5218.777 -0.644   blend
        104 569.230 (3P)4d 4F5/2 5242.763 +0.180 5242.775 lab
        104 993.860 (3F)4d 4D7/2 5362.172 -1.268   at the continuum level
        105 127.770 (5D)5d 4D5/2 5400.965 -1.143   at the continuum level
        105 234.237 (3H)4d 4F5/2 5432.211 -0.531   wrong, not observed
        105 379.430 (3F)4d 4D5/2 5475.409 -0.552 5475.42 computed too strong
        105 711.730 (5D)5d 6S5/2 5576.909 -1.432   at the continuum level
        106 208.560 (3F)4d 2F5/2 5735.883 -1.221   at the continuum level
        106 796.660 (3F)4d 4P5/2 5936.184 -1.317   at the level of the noise
        106 866.760 (3F)4d 4F5/2 5960.996 -0.565 5961.00  
        107 407.800 (3F)4d 2D5/2 6159.712 -0.665 6179.75 blend?
        110 428.280 (3G)4d 4F5/2 7568.195 -1.229   no spectrum
123 615.875 (3P)4f 1[3] 7/2 103 597.402 (3P)4d 2D5/2 4993.993 -1.435    
        104 023.910 (3H)4d 4G5/2 5102.711 -0.526 5102.7 lab, good agreement
        104 107.950 (3P)4d 4F7/2 5124.694 -1.046 5124.69 good agreement
        104 120.270 (5D)5d 6P5/2 5127.932 -0.244   wrong, not obs
        104 209.610 (3H)4d 2F5/2 5151.540 -0.081 5151.52 J78, lab, computed too weak
        104 481.590 (3H)4d 2F7/2 5224.766 -0.973 5227.77 good agreement
        104 569.230 (3P)4d 4F5/2 5248.807 -0.232 5248.801 computed too strong
        105 127.770 (5D)5d 4D5/2 5407.380 -1.391 5407.37 computed too weak
        105 234.237 (3H)4d 4F5/2 5438.700 -0.416 5438.70 computed too strong
        106 208.560 (3F)4d 2F5/2 5743.118 -0.454 5743.10 good agreement
123 649.493 (3P)4f 1[3] 5/2 104 209.610 (3H)4d 2F5/2 5142.631 -1.288   at the continuum level
        104 569.230 (3P)4d 4F5/2 5239.559 -1.150 5239.56 good agreement
        104 572.920 (3P)4d 4F3/2 5240.573 +0.071 5240.587 lab, good agreement
        104 588.710 (5D)5d 6D3/2 5244.914 -1.288   blend
        104 839.998 (3P)4d 2D3/2 5314.985 -0.441   blend,computed too strong
        105 234.237 (3H)4d 4F5/2 5428.771 -1.471   blend
        105 317.440 (3P)4d 2P3/2 5453.411 +0.082 5453.42 lab, computed too strong
        105 518.140 (3H)4d 4F3/2 5513.777 -0.591   wrong, not observed
        106 846.650 (3F)4d 4F3/2 5949.725 -1.358   at the continuum level
        107 430.250 (3F)4d 2D3/2 6163.810 -0.253   wrong, not observed
        108 105.900 (3F)4d 2P3/2 6431.741 -0.724   blend
124 157.060 (3P)4f 0[3] 5/2 104 569.230 (3P)4d 4F5/2 5103.788 -1.191 5103.8 good agreement
        104 572.920 (3P)4d 4F3/2 5104.750 +0.094 5104.75 lab, good agreement
        104 588.710 (5D)5d 6D3/2 5108.869 -1.369    
        104 839.998 (3P)4d 2D3/2 5175.329 -1.125   blend
        105 234.237 (3H)4d 4F5/2 5283.154 -0.937   blend
        105 317.440 (3P)4d 2P3/2 5306.486 -1.020 5306.49 computed too weak
        105 460.230 (3F)4d 4D3/2 5347.013 -0.482 5347.05 blend
        105 518.140 (3H)4d 4F3/2 5363.626 +0.082 5363.61 computed too strong
        106 846.650 (3F)4d 4F3/2 5775.269 -0.286 5775.25 good agreement
        107 430.250 (3F)4d 2D3/2 5976.771 -0.922   blend
        108 105.900 (3F)4d 2P3/2 6228.356 -0.686 6228.34 good agreement
        110 609.540 (3G)4d 4F3/2 7379.392 -1.370   at the continuum level


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.