Table 5:

Concentration bias of 2D fits.

Model
		no v-cut				v-cut
		no bg	fixed bg	free bg		no bg	fixed bg	free bg
NFW	1	0.86  0.07	1.01  0.08	0.99  0.05		0.96  0.06	1.02  0.07	1.01  0.07
Einasto m=5	1	0.82  0.06	0.97  0.08	0.96  0.05		0.93  0.06	0.99  0.07	0.97  0.07
NFW	1.35	0.78  0.06	0.98  0.08	0.98  0.05		0.91  0.06	1.01  0.07	0.96  0.05
Einasto m=5	1.35	0.72  0.06	0.93  0.07	0.95  0.05		0.87  0.06	0.96  0.06	0.94  0.05
NFW	3	0.37  0.04	0.85  0.09	0.98  0.11		0.68  0.04	0.96  0.06	0.96  0.10
Einasto m=5	3	0.32  0.03	0.71  0.08	0.92  0.16		0.59  0.04	0.83  0.05	0.89  0.05

Notes. The biases highlighted in bold (respectively blue italics) show the cases where the best-fit surface density profile was consistent with the data to better than 5% (between 0.01% and 5%) confidence (see last column of Table 4). The errors are the statistical (MLE fit) and cosmic variance (from the 3 cartesian stacked halos) errors of Table 4 added in quadrature together and with the analogous errors on the best-fit (bold in Table 1) 3D concentration, with .