Table 3:

Predicted line fluxes for different models, compared with the observed fluxes.
  Model #1 Model #2 Model #3 Observed
gas/dust 1 100 33 -
$f_{\rm PAH}$ 0.01 0.0055 0.0087 -
$f_{\rm UV}$ 0.005 0.0 0.0 -

Line
Line Fluxes $\rm [10^{-18}~W/m^2]$
[OI] 63.2 $\mu $m 154 71.6 71.6 71.7

[OI] 145.5  $\mu $m

5.17 10.1 7.01 <10.4

[CII] 157.7 $\mu $m

4.58 0.04 0.06 <6.4
o-H2O 179.5 $\mu $m 5.66 5.15 1.76 <8.8

12CO 2 $\rightarrow$ 1
0.060 0.092 0.093 0.093
13CO 2 $\rightarrow$ 1 0.011 0.059 0.048 0.048
12CO/13CO 5.69 1.55 1.92 1.94

Notes. The best fit is obtained by model #3. All models in this table have turbulent line broadening $v_{\rm turb}$ = 0.15 km s-1.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.