Parameter | ZAMS |
![]() |
![]() |
No rotation | |||
radius (![]() |
4.348 | 4.953 | 5.857 |
quadrupolar moment J2 | 3.370 ![]() ![]() |
2.766 ![]() ![]() |
2.013 ![]() ![]() |
Uniform rotation | |||
quadrupolar moment J2 | 8.411 ![]() ![]() |
7.136 ![]() ![]() |
5.171 ![]() ![]() |
mean radius R0 | 5.125 | 5.803 | 6.852 |
equatorial radius ![]() |
5.821 | 6.591 | 7.783 |
polar radius ![]() |
3.814 | 4.329 | 5.133 |
flattening
![]() |
1.526 | 1.522 | 1.516 |
Differ. rotation
![]() |
|||
quadrupolar moment J2 | 1.900 ![]() ![]() |
1.550 ![]() ![]() |
1.123 ![]() ![]() |
mean radius R0 | 5.773 | 6.671 | 7.902 |
equatorial radius ![]() |
6.557 | 7.577 | 8.846 |
polar radius ![]() |
4.204 | 4.889 | 5.846 |
flattening
![]() |
1.560 | 1.550 | 1.535 |
Notes. J2 is the quadrupolar moment defined in Eq. (17). ,
and R0 are respectively the equatorial, polar and mean radius. Taking the quadrupolar moment into account increases the flattening
of the stellar surface beyond the value 1.50 of the Roche model, and
even more so when the rotation is non-uniform (with the profile of Eq. (32));
this is illustrated here with a center-to-surface contrast of 4.
In the ``no rotation'' case, the non rotating model was used as
reference, while uniform rotation (h(x)=1) was assumed when solving the Poisson Eq. (29).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.