Highlight
Free Access

   

Table 2:

Model-fitting results.
  Compact component Extended component Goodness-of-fit
Model $\theta_{1}$ f $\rho$ $\phi^{(a)}$ i s R H/R $\epsilon$ $\theta_{\rm 2}$ $I_{\rm 2}/I_{\rm 1}$ $\chi^{2}_{r,V}$ $\chi^{2}_{r,\Phi}$ $\chi^{2}_{r}$
  [mas]   [mas] [ $\ifmmode^\circ\else^\circ\fi$] [ $\ifmmode^\circ\else^\circ\fi$]   [AU]     [mas]        
  Point-symmetric models:          
UD 13.86                     24.82 29.32(c) 25.92
RING 8.92 0.25(b)                   26.38 29.32(c) 25.21
GAUSS 8.55                     18.16 29.32(c) 20.88
2-GAUSS 5.77                 25.78 0.59 2.35 29.32(c) 8.92
  Asymmetric models:          
BINARY 4.8   6.2 34           14.8 1.04 3.47 5.32 3.93
SKEWED RING   0.8   190 14 0.64 0.44     27 0.58 1.58 3.13 1.96
VERTICAL RIM       132 16   0.60 0.35   27 0.68 2.30 6.16 3.25
CURVED RIM       180 35       $\epsilon_{\rm cr}$ 32 0.50 1.77 3.28 2.14

Notes. (a) This column gives the model orientation, measured East of North. For the BINARY model, $\phi$ gives the PA of the separation vector, while for the SKEWED RING, VERTICAL RIM, and CURVED RIM models, the orientation of the ellipse/rim major axis is given. Due to a lack of closure phase calibration observations on the E0-G0-H0 array configuration, we are unfortunately not able to unambiguously define the CP sign, resulting in a 180 $\ifmmode^\circ\else^\circ\fi$-ambiguity in the derived position angles. (b) In the fitting process, this parameter was fixed. (c) This model is point-symmetric, resulting in a CP which is identical zero.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.