EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 506 / No 1 (October IV 2009) A&A, 506 1 (2009) 111-123 Full HTML
 

 

Table 4:

Model evaluation $^{\dagger }$.
Model AIC (%) BIC (%) VR (%) PR (%) k
Eq. (5), fixed comb 94.010 94.065 97.755 25.50 78
Eq. (3), Scargle freqs 94.023 94.171 97.761 25.49 100
Eq. (3), NLLS freqs 94.021 94.169 97.762 25.49 100
Eq. (6), 1 freq 95.417 95.378 96.873 30.81 40
Eq. (3), Scargle freqs 95.405 95.314 96.872 30.87 28
Eq. (3), NLLS freqs 95.404 95.314 96.872 30.85 28
Eq. (6), 2 freqs 95.228 95.255 97.019 30.14 58
Eq. (3), Scargle freqs 95.204 95.130 97.017 30.24 34
Eq. (3), NLLS freqs 95.204 95.130 97.017 30.22 34
Eq. (6), 3 freqs 94.887 97.974 97.255 28.65 76
Eq. (3), Scargle freqs 94.837 94.783 97.263 28.84 43
Eq. (3), NLLS freqs 94.837 94.783 97.263 28.82 43
Eq. (6), 4 freqs 94.746 94.901 97.355 27.99 94
Eq. (3), Scargle freqs 94.687 94.664 97.361 28.29 52
Eq. (3), NLLS freqs 94.687 94.664 97.361 28.29 52

$\dagger$ The best model according to the four considered statistics are emphasised in bold.


Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.