EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 506 / No 1 (October IV 2009) A&A, 506 1 (2009) 111-123 Full HTML
   

Table 1:

Comparison between errors derived using theoretical formulas with correlation correction (input) and empirically derived estimates of the parameters and errors (estimators).
Set Type Frequency f $\sigma(f)$ Amplitude A $\sigma(A)$ Phase $\phi$ $\sigma(\phi)$
Monoperiodic High S/N estimator $5.4800000\pm 0.0000004$ 0.000007 $2.0000 \pm 0.0002$ 0.004 $+0.31703 \pm 0.00003$ 0.0006
  input 5.4800000 0.000007 2.0000 0.004 +0.31700 0.002
Monoperiodic Low S/N estimator $5.47998 \pm 0.00002$ 0.0008 $0.2153 \pm 0.0001$ 0.003 $+0.319 \pm 0.002$ 0.06
  input 5.48000 0.0007 0.0200 0.004 +0.317 0.2
Multiperiodic estimator $5.4868899\pm 0.0000003$ 0.000007 $34~912 \pm 3$ 66 $-0.03552\pm 0.00003$ 0.0006
  input 5.4868900 0.00001 34 918 98 -0.03551 0.003

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.