Partially-erupting prominences: a comparison between observations and model-predicted observables

Free Access

Table 2:

Comparing the observables predicted by *Model PEFR* (see Sect. 2) with *Model IS* and *Model TE*.
Predicted observables	Model IS	Model TE	Model PEFR
(Sect. 2)	(In situ forming	(Total eruption	(Partial eruption
	flux rope)	of flux rope)	of flux rope)
1 (Pre-existing cavity)		$\surd$	$\surd$
2 (Quiescent sigmoid)		$\surd$	$\surd$
3 (Partly erupting filament)	$\surd$		$\surd$
4 (Partly erupting cavity)			$\surd$
5 (Flare ribbon surrounding filament)	$\surd$		$\surd$
6 (Sheared post-eruption loops)	$\surd$		$\surd$
7 (Cusp over reformed sigmoid)			$\surd$
8 (Dimming external to source)	Note^a		$\surd$

^a See Mandrini et al. (2007) for a possible exception.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.