Table 3:

A comparative test of the perturbed disk and the merger remnant hypotheses.
Observed property Best hypothesis Comments
much redder disk than the bulge merger remnant rapid disk rebuilt is predicted (Governato et al. 2007): renewed disks are thus star forming and dusty (Lotz et al. 2008b)
bar & two arms system both expected for both (see text)
misaligned dynamical axis merger remnant in absence of significant outflow, it reveals a system not at equilibrium, difficult to explain except by a merger
average disk velocity dispersion (74 km s-1) merger remnant unclear which perturbation other than merging can provide such a hot disk ($\sigma>56$ km s-1)
velocity dispersion peak locations merger remnant only two minor mergers near the two locations may explain such features in a perturbed disk
very high disk star formation density merger remnant regulation of star formation between gravitational instabilities and porosity is expected in rotating disks (e.g. Silk 1997)
discrepancy from the Tully Fisher merger remnant expected in a merger (e.g. Puech et al. 2007) and quite unexpected in a perturbed disk (see above)
half of the stars with ages lower than 800 Myr merger remnant correspond to the merger time-scale during which these stars are formed

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.