Free Access
 

 

Table 4:

Spectral types, distances and tangential velocities of new HPM objects and comparison objects.
Name SpT Err SpT Err SpT Err SpT SpT SpT sd ? $d_{\rm spec}$ $v_{\rm tan}$
abbreviated PC3   TiO5   VOa   Ind Comp Adopted $\zeta_{\rm TiO/CaH}$ [pc] [km s-1]
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
SDSS J002138.. M9.7 0.5 L3.9 2.8 L2.0 3.3 L1.9 L1.5 L1.5   112 97
SDSS J002800.. M9.7 0.2 M8.7 0.4 L1.4 1.3 M9.9 L0.5 L0.0   151 119
SDSS J003435.. M8.4 0.2 M7.8 0.4 M7.1 1.6 M7.8 M8.5 M8.0 sdM: 197 134
SDSS J003550.. M7.3 0.5 M7.7 1.0 M9.0 2.3 M8.0 M7.5 M8.0   266 202
SDSS J005349.. M9.3 0.3 M9.8 0.4 M8.0 1.6 M9.9 L0.5 L0.0   149 102
SDSS J005636.. L2.7 0.5 L1.8 1.4 M9.4 2.5 L1.3 L1.5 L1.5   119 94
SDSS J005837.. M7.5 0.4 M8.5 0.2 M9.3 1.4 M8.4 M9.0 M8.5 sdM: 182 290
SDSS J010959.. M3.2 0.8 <M0 1.1 M6.5 2.3   CWD CWD   165$^{\star}$ 221
SDSS J011014.. L4.0 0.5 L8.3 2.7 L4.4 1.1 L4.2 L3.5 L4.0   64 166
SDSS J011755.. M4.3 0.3 M2.2 0.3 M7.3 1.6 M4.6 M5.0 M5.0/sdM7: sdM: 920/625 (762/518) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J013415.. M5.9 0.2 M3.6 0.6 M6.7 1.0 M5.4 M6.0 M5.5 sdM: 612 381
SDSS J014956.. M9.9 0.2 M9.4 0.8 M9.3 1.1 M9.5 L1.0 L0.5   118 99
SDSS J020508.. M2.3 0.5 <M0 0.6 M6.6 1.3   CWD CWD   118$^{\star}$ 104
SDSS J021546.. M5.4 0.5 <M0 0.3 M5.0 1.5   esdM: M5p:/>esdM3.5: usdM: 1068/<1138 869/<926
SDSS J024958.. M5.0 0.3 M4.7 0.2 M3.9 1.2 M4.5 M5.5 M5.0/sdM7 sdM: 886/602 617/419
SDSS J025316.. M3.1 0.3 M4.3 0.3 M6.0 1.3 M4.5 M4.5 M4.5   1387 1050
SDSS J032129.. M3.4 0.3 <M0 0.3 M3.2 1.0   CWD CWD   129$^{\star}$ 110
SDSS J033203.. M4.1 0.4 M3.4 0.5 M8.3 1.6 M5.2 M5.5 M5.5/sdM7:   872/719 (678/559) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J033456.. L1.3 0.1 M6.8 0.2 L2.7 0.6 L0.3 L0.5 L0.5   103 197
SDSS J204821.. M4.0 0.4 M1.5 0.4 M6.5 0.7 M4.0 M4.5 M4.5 sdM: 1109 (2119) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J213151.. M9.1 0.4 L1.7 2.1 M8.2 2.0 M9.7 L0.5 L0.0   141 101
SDSS J215322.. M3.7 0.5 M4.9 0.5 M4.0 1.3 M4.2 M5.0 M4.5/sdM7:   1360/704 (1817/941) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J215351.. M3.2 0.3 M4.1 0.4 M3.6 1.2 M4.0 M4.0 M4.0   1626 (1185) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J215515.. M5.2 0.4 M5.6 0.2 M3.2 1.3 M4.7 M5.5 M5.0/sdM7   862/585 (604/410) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J215817.. L1.5 0.1 L1.3 0.4 L1.9 0.7 L1.6 L1.0 L1.5   106 74
SDSS J215934.. M8.3 0.4 M8.3 0.5 M9.2 1.4 M8.6 L0.5 M9.5   206 193
SDSS J220952.. M3.7 0.8 M3.3 1.0 M4.7 3.1 M3.9 M5.5 M4.5/sdM7:   1285/665 (920/476) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J221911.. M4.2 0.4 M0.2 1.0 M5.7 1.3 M3.4 M4.0 M3.5/sdM2: sdM: 2548/1910 (2454/1839) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J222939.. M2.5 0.3 <M0 0.7 M2.7 1.1   CWD CWD   135$^{\star}$ 115
SDSS J225903.. M8.9 0.3 M6.9 0.2 M9.3 1.2 M8.4 M8.0 M8.0   265 (319) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J230722.. L1.3 0.1 M9.6 0.5 M9.6 2.8 L0.2 L2.0 L1.0   136 91
SDSS J231407.. M8.5 0.3 M7.7 0.4 M8.3 1.2 M8.2 M8.0 M8.0   243 202
SDSS J231914.. M5.4 0.5 M4.2 0.8 M4.4 1.5 M4.7 M6.0 M5.5/sdM7   949/782 (2304/1899) $^{\dagger}$
SDSS J232935.. M8.6 0.3 M6.6 0.3 M5.8 1.4 M7.0 M8.0 M7.5   281 194
SDSS J234841.. L1.7 0.2 L1.9 0.6 L1.7 1.3 L1.8 L1.5 L1.5   112 91
SDSS J235826.. M7.5 0.4 M8.1 0.3 M8.4 1.3 M8.0 M7.5 M8.0   283 242
SDSS J235835.. M9.2 0.3 M7.2 0.2 L0.7 0.9 M9.0 L0.5 L0.0   112 132
SDSS J235841.. L1.5 0.2 L0.5 1.0 L2.9 1.8 L1.6 L1.0 L1.5   122 109
comparison L                        
2MASS J005212.. L3.1 0.4 L6.8 1.2 L4.2 1.1 L4.7 L4.5 L4.5   53 62
SDSSp J005406.. L1.4 0.1 L1.6 0.2 L1.6 0.6 L1.5   L1.0   55 77
2MASSI J010407.. L3.7 0.3 L1.0 0.4 L5.1 0.8 L3.3   L4.5   51 110
SDSSp J010752.. L4.7 0.4 L1.9 0.3 L2.0 1.3     L8.0   17 51
SDSSp J023617.. L5.8 0.1 L3.1 0.4 L1.7 1.3   L9.0 L9.0   18 17
SDSS J214046.. L2.5 0.2 L2.5 0.3 L3.7 1.0 L2.9   L3.0   54 56
comparison sd                        
SDSS J125637.. L2.2 0.1 M7.8 0.1 L3.9 0.5     sdL4: sdL 1201 3531
LSR 1610-0040 M6.9 0.1 M4.2 0.2 M5.7 0.2     M6p/sdM sdM 322 2212
SSSPM J1013.. M7.3 0.1 M8.3 0.1 L2.1 0.1     sdM9.5 sdM 503 2443
LEHPM 2-59 M5.4 0.1 L1.0 0.3 M5.9 0.3     esdM8 usdM 664 2334
comparison CWD                        
SDSSp J133739.. M0.6 0.3 <M0 0.4 M3.9 0.8     CWD   20-545 17-465
Notes: 1 - Sivarani et al. (2004); Burgasser et al. (2007); 2 - according to Dahn et al. (2008); 3 - Scholz et al. (2004a); 4 - Pokorny et al. (2004), Burgasser & Kirkpatrick (2006); 5 - Harris et al. (2001). Distances in Col. (12) marked by $^{\star}$ were derived assuming an absolute magnitude of Mi=15.9; uncertainties in distances and tangential velocities are $\sim$23% for M 7-L 9 dwarfs and $\sim$46% for new CWDs and M 3-M 6 dwarfs (including alternative subdwarf types) (see text). Objects with tangential velocities in Col. (13) marked by $^{\dagger}$ have uncertain proper motions (see Table 1). Their tangential velocities (putted in parentheses) have therefore an additional uncertainty, i.e. they may be overestimated by an unknown factor.

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.