Analysis of two-point statistics of cosmic shear - III. Covariances of shear measures made easy
A&A, 477 1 (2008) 43-54
Published online: 2007-11-06
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
317 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96504-3_7
KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey
Angus H. Wright, Benjamin Stölzner, Marika Asgari, Maciej Bilicki, Benjamin Giblin, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Henk Hoekstra, Benjamin Joachimi, Konrad Kuijken, Shun-Sheng Li, Robert Reischke, Maximilian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Mijin Yoon, Pierre Burger, Nora Elisa Chisari, Jelte de Jong, Andrej Dvornik, Christos Georgiou, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Priyanka Jalan, Anjitha John William, Shahab Joudaki, Giorgio Francesco Lesci, Laila Linke, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 703 A158 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202554908
Testing interacting dark energy with Stage IV cosmic shear surveys through differentiable neural emulators
Karim Carrion, Alessio Spurio Mancini, Davide Piras and Juan Carlos HidalgoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 539 (4) 3220 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf663
Constraining baryonic physics with DES Y1 and Planck data: Combining galaxy clustering, weak lensing, and CMB lensing
Jiachuan Xu, Tim Eifler, Vivian Miranda, Xiao Fang, Evan Saraivanov, Elisabeth Krause, Hung-Jin Huang, Karim Benabed and Kunhao ZhongPhysical Review D 110 (6) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063532
Forecast of Joint Analysis of Cosmic Shear and Supernovae Magnification from the CSST and LSST
Ye Cao, Bin Hu, Ji Yao and Hu ZhanThe Astrophysical Journal 970 (1) 49 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d96
What is the super-sample covariance? A fresh perspective for second-order shear statistics
Laila Linke, Pierre A. Burger, Sven Heydenreich, Lucas Porth and Peter SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 681 A33 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346225
A roadmap to cosmological parameter analysis with third-order shear statistics
Laila Linke, Sven Heydenreich, Pierre A. Burger and Peter SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 672 A185 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245652
KiDS and Euclid: Cosmological implications of a pseudo angular power spectrum analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear tomography
A. Loureiro, L. Whittaker, A. Spurio Mancini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 665 A56 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142481
Forecasting the potential of weak lensing magnification to enhance LSST large-scale structure analyses
Constance Mahony, Maria Cristina Fortuna, Benjamin Joachimi, Andreas Korn, Henk Hoekstra, Samuel J Schmidt, David Alonso, Sukhdeep Singh, Marina Ricci, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Christopher Duncan and Harry JohnstonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513 (1) 1210 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac872
Euclid: Covariance of weak lensing pseudo-Cℓ estimates
R. E. Upham, M. L. Brown, L. Whittaker, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 660 A114 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142908
Statistical modelling of the cosmological dispersion measure
Ryuichi Takahashi, Kunihito Ioka, Asuka Mori and Koki FunahashiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (2) 2615 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab170
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis
A. Porredon, M. Crocce, P. Fosalba, J. Elvin-Poole, A. Carnero Rosell, R. Cawthon, T. F. Eifler, X. Fang, I. Ferrero, E. Krause, N. MacCrann, N. Weaverdyck, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, S. Allam, A. Amon, S. Avila, D. Bacon, E. Bertin, S. Bhargava, S. L. Bridle, D. Brooks, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, et al.Physical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043503
KiDS-1000 methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis
B. Joachimi, C.-A. Lin, M. Asgari, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 646 A129 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038831
Breaking degeneracies with the Sunyaev-Zeldovich full bispectrum
Andrea Ravenni, Matteo Rizzato, Slađana Radinović, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (06) 026 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/026
KiDS+VIKING-450: An internal-consistency test for cosmic shear tomography with a colour-based split of source galaxies
Shun-Sheng Li, Konrad Kuijken, Henk Hoekstra, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 646 A175 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039254
Introduction to Gravitational Lensing
Massimo MeneghettiLecture Notes in Physics, Introduction to Gravitational Lensing 956 331 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73582-1_7
KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Mitigating baryon feedback uncertainty with COSEBIs
Marika Asgari, Tilman Tröster, Catherine Heymans, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 634 A127 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936512
rascalc: a jackknife approach to estimating single- and multitracer galaxy covariance matrices
Oliver H E Philcox, Daniel J Eisenstein, Ross O’Connell and Alexander WiegandMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (3) 3290 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3218
Blinding multiprobe cosmological experiments
J Muir, G M Bernstein, D Huterer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 4454 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa965
Tomographic weak lensing bispectrum: a thorough analysis towards the next generation of galaxy surveys
Matteo Rizzato, Karim Benabed, Francis Bernardeau and Fabien LacasaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (4) 4688 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2862
Consistent cosmic shear in the face of systematics: a B-mode analysis of KiDS-450, DES-SV and CFHTLenS
Marika Asgari, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik Hildebrandt, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 624 A134 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834379
Mock galaxy shape catalogues in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey
Hironao Miyatake, Ryuichi Takahashi, Masahiro Takada, Takashi Hamana and Masato ShirasakiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (1) 52 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz791
Covariances for cosmic shear and galaxy–galaxy lensing in the response approach
Ryuichi Takahashi, Takahiro Nishimichi, Masahiro Takada, Masato Shirasaki and Kosei ShiroyamaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482 (3) 4253 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2962
Core Cosmology Library: Precision Cosmological Predictions for LSST
Nora Elisa Chisari, David Alonso, Elisabeth Krause, C. Danielle Leonard, Philip Bull, Jérémy Neveu, Antonio Villarreal, Sukhdeep Singh, Thomas McClintock, John Ellison, Zilong Du, Joe Zuntz, Alexander Mead, Shahab Joudaki, Christiane S. Lorenz, Tilman Tröster, Javier Sanchez, Francois Lanusse, Mustapha Ishak, Renée Hlozek, Jonathan Blazek, Jean-Eric Campagne, Husni Almoubayyed, Tim Eifler, Matthew Kirby, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 242 (1) 2 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab1658
KiDS + GAMA: constraints on horndeski gravity from combined large-scale structure probes
A Spurio Mancini, F Köhlinger, B Joachimi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (2) 2155 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2581
Cosmology from the Chinese Space Station Optical Survey (CSS-OS)
Yan Gong, Xiangkun Liu, Ye Cao, Xuelei Chen, Zuhui Fan, Ran Li, Xiao-Dong Li, Zhigang Li, Xin Zhang and Hu ZhanThe Astrophysical Journal 883 (2) 203 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab391e
Unveiling galaxy bias via the halo model, KiDS, and GAMA
Andrej Dvornik, Henk Hoekstra, Konrad Kuijken, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (1) 1240 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1502
Covariance of the galaxy angular power spectrum with the halo model
Fabien LacasaAstronomy & Astrophysics 615 A1 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732343
Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements
M A Troxel, E Krause, C Chang, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 479 (4) 4998 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1889
The skewed weak lensing likelihood: why biases arise, despite data and theory being sound
Elena Sellentin, Catherine Heymans and Joachim Harnois-DérapsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 477 (4) 4879 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty988
Preparing for the cosmic shear data flood: Optimal data extraction and simulation requirements for stage IV dark energy experiments
Peter L. Taylor, Thomas D. Kitching and Jason D. McEwenPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043532
KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy–galaxy lensing, and angular clustering
Edo van Uitert, Benjamin Joachimi, Shahab Joudaki, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (4) 4662 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty551
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
H. Hildebrandt, M. Viola, C. Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 1454 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2805
Parametrizing modified gravity for cosmological surveys
Jérôme GleyzesPhysical Review D 96 (6) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.063516
Full-sky Gravitational Lensing Simulation for Large-area Galaxy Surveys and Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments
Ryuichi Takahashi, Takashi Hamana, Masato Shirasaki, Toshiya Namikawa, Takahiro Nishimichi, Ken Osato and Kosei ShiroyamaThe Astrophysical Journal 850 (1) 24 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa943d
KiDS-450: the tomographic weak lensing power spectrum and constraints on cosmological parameters
F. Köhlinger, M. Viola, B. Joachimi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (4) 4412 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1820
Probabilistic Cosmological Mass Mapping from Weak Lensing Shear
M. D. Schneider, K. Y. Ng, W. A. Dawson, P. J. Marshall, J. E. Meyers and D. J. BardThe Astrophysical Journal 839 (1) 25 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/839/1/25
Performance of internal covariance estimators for cosmic shear correlation functions
O. Friedrich, S. Seitz, T. F. Eifler and D. GruenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (3) 2662 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2833
Cosmic shear measurements with Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
M. R. Becker, M. A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, et al.Physical Review D 94 (2) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.022002
COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. II. FULL COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS FROM TOMOGRAPHY
M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Stefan Hilbert, Michael D. Schneider, Samuel Schmidt and David WittmanThe Astrophysical Journal 824 (2) 77 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/77
Cosmic shear as a probe of galaxy formation physics
Simon Foreman, Matthew R. Becker and Risa H. WechslerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 3326 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2189
Simulations of weak gravitational lensing – II. Including finite support effects in cosmic shear covariance matrices
Joachim Harnois-Déraps and Ludovic van WaerbekeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (3) 2857 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv794
A new data compression method and its application to cosmic shear analysis
Marika Asgari and Peter SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 578 A50 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424905
Baryons, neutrinos, feedback and weak gravitational lensing
Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Ludovic van Waerbeke, Massimo Viola and Catherine HeymansMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (2) 1212 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv646
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Martin KilbingerReports on Progress in Physics 78 (8) 086901 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
Estimating cosmological parameter covariance
A. Taylor and B. JoachimiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 442 (3) 2728 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu996
On estimating cosmology-dependent covariance matrices
Christopher B Morrison and Michael D SchneiderJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013 (11) 009 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/11/009
Cosmic shear E/B-mode estimation with binned correlation function data
Matthew R. BeckerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (2) 1547 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1396
COSMIC SHEAR RESULTS FROM THE DEEP LENS SURVEY. I. JOINT CONSTRAINTS ON ΩMAND σ8WITH A TWO-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
M. James Jee, J. Anthony Tyson, Michael D. Schneider, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 765 (1) 74 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/74
COSMOS: STOCHASTIC BIAS FROM MEASUREMENTS OF WEAK LENSING AND GALAXY CLUSTERING
Eric Jullo, Jason Rhodes, Alina Kiessling, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 750 (1) 37 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/37
Cosmic shear tomography and efficient data compression using COSEBIs
M. Asgari, P. Schneider and P. SimonAstronomy & Astrophysics 542 A122 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201218828
Calibration biases in measurements of weak lensing
M. Bartelmann, M. Viola, P. Melchior and B. M. SchäferAstronomy & Astrophysics 547 A98 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116983
Weak-lensing statistics from the Coyote Universe
Tim EiflerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (1) 536 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19502.x
Weak lensing from space: first cosmological constraints from three-point shear statistics★
Elisabetta Semboloni, Tim Schrabback, Ludovic van Waerbeke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 410 (1) 143 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17430.x
Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample
B. Joachimi, R. Mandelbaum, F. B. Abdalla and S. L. BridleAstronomy & Astrophysics 527 A26 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015621
Shear power spectrum reconstruction using the pseudo-spectrum method
Chiaki Hikage, Masahiro Takada, Takashi Hamana and David SpergelMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 412 (1) 65 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17886.x
Forecasts of non-Gaussian parameter spaces using Box-Cox transformations
B. Joachimi and A. N. TaylorMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (2) 1010 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19107.x
Cosmological information in Gaussianized weak lensing signals
B. Joachimi, A. N. Taylor and A. KiesslingMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (1) 145 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19472.x
SIMULATIONS OF WIDE-FIELD WEAK-LENSING SURVEYS. II. COVARIANCE MATRIX OF REAL-SPACE CORRELATION FUNCTIONS
Masanori Sato, Masahiro Takada, Takashi Hamana and Takahiko MatsubaraThe Astrophysical Journal 734 (2) 76 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/76
Cosmic shear covariance: the log-normal approximation
S. Hilbert, J. Hartlap and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 536 A85 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117294
Gravitational lensing
Matthias BartelmannClassical and Quantum Gravity 27 (23) 233001 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/23/233001
A fitting formula for the non-Gaussian contribution to the lensing power spectrum covariance
J. Pielorz, J. Rödiger, I. Tereno and P. SchneiderAstronomy and Astrophysics 514 A79 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912854
Breaking the degeneracy: Optimal use of three-point weak lensing statistics
Sanaz Vafaei, Tingting Lu, Ludovic van Waerbeke, et al.Astroparticle Physics 32 (6) 340 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2009.10.003
Evidence of the accelerated expansion of the Universe from weak lensing tomography with COSMOS
T. Schrabback, J. Hartlap, B. Joachimi, et al.Astronomy and Astrophysics 516 A63 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913577
Controlling intrinsic-shear alignment in three-point weak lensing statistics
X. Shi, B. Joachimi and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 523 A60 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014191
Intrinsic alignment boosting
B. Joachimi and P. SchneiderAstronomy and Astrophysics 517 A4 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014482
COSEBIs: Extracting the full E-/B-mode information from cosmic shear correlation functions
P. Schneider, T. Eifler and E. KrauseAstronomy and Astrophysics 520 A116 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014235
Simultaneous measurement of cosmology and intrinsic alignments using joint cosmic shear and galaxy number density correlations
B. Joachimi and S. L. BridleAstronomy & Astrophysics 523 A1 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913657
Constrained correlation functions
P. Schneider and J. HartlapAstronomy & Astrophysics 504 (3) 705 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912424
Dependence of cosmic shear covariances on cosmology
T. Eifler, P. Schneider and J. HartlapAstronomy & Astrophysics 502 (3) 721 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200811276
Bispectrum covariance in the flat-sky limit
B. Joachimi, X. Shi and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 508 (3) 1193 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912906
Sources of contamination to weak lensing tomography: redshift-dependent shear measurement bias
Elisabetta Semboloni, Ismael Tereno, Ludovic van Waerbeke and Catherine HeymansMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 397 (2) 608 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14926.x
The non-Gaussianity of the cosmic shear likelihood or how odd is theChandraDeep Field South?
J. Hartlap, T. Schrabback, P. Simon and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 504 (3) 689 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200911697
The impact of non-Gaussian errors on weak lensing surveys
Masahiro Takada and Bhuvnesh JainMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 395 (4) 2065 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14504.x
The removal of shear-ellipticity correlations from the cosmic shear signal
B. Joachimi and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 507 (1) 105 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912420
The removal of shear-ellipticity correlations from the cosmic shear signal via nulling techniques
B. Joachimi and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 488 (3) 829 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200809971