Least-squares methods with Poissonian noise: Analysis and comparison with the Richardson-Lucy algorithm
A&A, 436 2 (2005) 741-755
Published online: 2005-05-30
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Image Deconvolution to Resolve Astronomical X-Ray Sources in Close Proximity: The NuSTAR Images of SXP 15.3 and SXP 305
Sayantan Bhattacharya, Dimitris M. Christodoulou and Silas G. T. LaycockAlgorithms 18 (4) 191 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/a18040191
596 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1109/ATC63255.2024.10908158
β-SGP: Scaled Gradient Projection with β-divergence for astronomical image restoration
Y. Gondhalekar, M. Safonova and S. SahaAstronomy and Computing 44 100739 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2023.100739
The Thresher: Lucky imaging without the waste
J A Hitchcock, D M Bramich, D Foreman-Mackey, David W Hogg and M HundertmarkMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (4) 5372 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac427
Spectral Norm Regularization for Blind Image Deblurring
Shuhan Sun, Zhiyong Xu and Jianlin ZhangSymmetry 13 (10) 1856 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13101856
Blind Deblurring Based on Sigmoid Function
Shuhan Sun, Lizhen Duan, Zhiyong Xu and Jianlin ZhangSensors 21 (10) 3484 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103484
Computational Methods for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Marco Prato, Andrea La Camera, Carmelo Arcidiacono, Patrizia Boccacci and Mario BerteroSpringer INdAM Series, Computational Methods for Inverse Problems in Imaging 36 117 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32882-5_6
Diffraction-Assisted Light Field Microscopy for Microtomography and Digital Volume Correlation with Improved Spatial Resolution
Z. Pan, M. Lu and S. XiaExperimental Mechanics 59 (5) 713 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-019-00522-2
A Fast Algorithm for Deconvolution and Poisson Noise Removal
Xiongjun Zhang, Michael K. Ng and Minru BaiJournal of Scientific Computing 75 (3) 1535 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0597-2
A new approach to blind deconvolution of astronomical images
S V Vorontsov and S M JefferiesInverse Problems 33 (5) 055004 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aa5e16
Ionospheric‐thermospheric UV tomography: 1. Image space reconstruction algorithms
K. F. Dymond, S. A. Budzien and M. A. HeiRadio Science 52 (3) 338 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RS005869
High-order total variation-based Poissonian image deconvolution with spatially adapted regularization parameter
Jun Liu, Ting-Zhu Huang, Xiao-Guang Lv and Si WangApplied Mathematical Modelling 45 516 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.009
The Limits of Resolution
Series in Optics and Optoelectronics, The Limits of Resolution 363 (2016)https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315366708-9
A stochastic approach to quantifying the blur with uncertainty estimation for high-energy X-ray imaging systems
Michael J. Fowler, Marylesa Howard, Aaron Luttman, Stephen E. Mitchell and Timothy J. WebbInverse Problems in Science and Engineering 24 (3) 353 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2015.1046859
High-resolution speckle imaging through strong atmospheric turbulence
Douglas A. Hope, Stuart M. Jefferies, Michael Hart and James G. NagyOptics Express 24 (11) 12116 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.012116
Deblurring Poisson noisy images by total variation with overlapping group sparsity
Xiao-Guang Lv, Le Jiang and Jun LiuApplied Mathematics and Computation 289 132 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.03.029
Restoration of Thickness, Density, and Volume for Highly Blurred Thin Cortical Bones in Clinical CT Images
Amirreza Pakdel, Michael Hardisty, Jeffrey Fialkov and Cari WhyneAnnals of Biomedical Engineering 44 (11) 3359 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1654-y
1 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASCC.2015.7244664
Comparative study on several blind deconvolution algorithms applied to underwater image restoration
Fan Fan, Kecheng Yang, Min Xia, et al.Optical Review 17 (3) 123 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-010-0022-7
Regularization parameter selection methods for ill-posed Poisson maximum likelihood estimation
Johnathan M Bardsley and John GoldesInverse Problems 25 (9) 095005 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/25/9/095005
1 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPHOT.2009.5559014
Tikhonov regularized Poisson likelihood estimation: theoretical justification and a computational method
Johnathan M. Bardsley† and N'djekornom LaobeulInverse Problems in Science and Engineering 16 (2) 199 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1080/17415970701404235
1756 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2008.4712115
Blind deconvolution: multiplicative iterative algorithm
Jianlin Zhang, Qiheng Zhang and Guangming HeOptics Letters 33 (1) 25 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.000025
Texas Two-Step: A Framework for Optimal Multi-Input Single-Output Deconvolution
Ramesh Neelsh Neelamani, Max Deffenbaugh and Richard G. BaraniukIEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16 (11) 2752 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2007.906251
Covariance-Preconditioned Iterative Methods for Nonnegatively Constrained Astronomical Imaging
Johnathan M. Bardsley and James G. NagySIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 27 (4) 1184 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1137/040615043
Dealing with edge effects in least-squares image deconvolution problems
R. Vio, J. Bardsley, M. Donatelli and W. WamstekerAstronomy & Astrophysics 442 (1) 397 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053414