Approximate angular diameter distance in a locally inhomogeneous universe with nonzero cosmological constant
A&A, 411 2 (2003) 33-40
Published online: 2003-11-17
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Electromagnetic Waves in Cosmological Space–Time II. Luminosity Distance
Denitsa Staicova and Michail StoilovUniverse 11 (2) 50 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11020050
The averaging problem on the past null cone in inhomogeneous dust cosmologies
Thomas Buchert, Henk van Elst and Asta HeinesenGeneral Relativity and Gravitation 55 (1) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-022-03051-x
Observational tests of the Glavan, Prokopec and Starobinsky model of dark energy
Marek Demianski and Ester PiedipalumboThe European Physical Journal C 79 (7) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7045-4
Some anisotropic planar stellar models
Z. Yousaf and M. Zaeem-ul-Haq BhattiInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 15 (09) 1850160 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887818501608
Exact geodesic distances in FLRW spacetimes
William J. Cunningham, David Rideout, James Halverson and Dmitri KrioukovPhysical Review D 96 (10) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103538
Unbiased constraints on the clumpiness of the Universe from standard candles
Zhengxiang Li, Xuheng Ding and Zong-Hong ZhuPhysical Review D 91 (8) (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.083010
Accelerated Cosmic Expansion
Carlos Custodio and Nora BretónAstrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, Accelerated Cosmic Expansion 38 75 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02063-1_6
Constraining smoothness parameter and the DD relation of Dyer-Roeder equation with supernovae
Xi Yang, Hao-Ran Yu and Tong-Jie ZhangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013 (06) 007 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/06/007
Observational constraints from supernovae Ia and gamma-ray bursts on a clumpy universe
Nora Bretón and Ariadna MontielPhysical Review D 87 (6) (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.063527
Fundamental Questions of Practical Cosmology
Yurij Baryshev and Pekka TeerikorpiAstrophysics and Space Science Library, Fundamental Questions of Practical Cosmology 383 131 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2379-5_7
Constraining the dark energy and smoothness parameter with type Ia supernovae and gamma-ray bursts
V. C. Busti, R. C. Santos and J. A. S. LimaPhysical Review D 85 (10) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103503
Ricci focusing, shearing, and the expansion rate in an almost homogeneous Universe
Krzysztof Bolejko and Pedro G FerreiraJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2012 (05) 003 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2012/05/003
Standardizing the gamma-ray bursts with the Amati Ep,i-Eiso relation: the updated Hubble diagram and implications for cosmography
Marek Demianski and Ester PiedipalumboMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 415 (4) 3580 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18975.x
Constraints on smoothness parameter and dark energy using observationalH(z) data
Hao-Ran Yu, Tian Lan, Hao-Yi Wan, Tong-Jie Zhang and Bao-Quan WangResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 11 (2) 125 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/11/2/001
Weak lensing and the Dyer-Roeder approximation
K. BolejkoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 412 (3) 1937 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18031.x
Dark energy and inhomogeneity
G F R EllisJournal of Physics: Conference Series 189 012011 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/189/1/012011
Cosmological models in scalar tensor theories of gravity and observations: a class of general solutions
M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano and P. ScudellaroAstronomy & Astrophysics 481 (2) 279 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20067045
Constraining the dark energy and smoothness parameter with supernovae
R. C. Santos, J. V. Cunha and J. A. S. LimaPhysical Review D 77 (2) (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.023519
Clustering, angular size, and dark energy
R. C. Santos and J. A. S. LimaPhysical Review D 77 (8) (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.083505
Evaluating backreaction with the peak model of structure formation
Syksy RäsänenJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (04) 026 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/026
Interacting galaxies and cosmological parameters
H. Reboul and J.-P. CordoniAstronomy & Astrophysics 451 (2) 387 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053879
Testing a New Analytic Model for Gravitational Lensing Probabilities
Sudeep Das and Jeremiah P. OstrikerThe Astrophysical Journal 645 (1) 1 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1086/504032
Accelerating universe in scalar tensor models – comparison of theoretical predictions with observations
M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano and C. TortoraAstronomy & Astrophysics 454 (1) 55 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054601
The universe seen at different scales
George F.R. Ellis and Thomas BuchertPhysics Letters A 347 (1-3) 38 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.087
Two viable quintessence models of the Universe: Confrontation of theoretical predictions with observational data
M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, C. Rubano and C. TortoraAstronomy & Astrophysics 431 (1) 27 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041508
Lens modelling and estimate ofH0in quadruply lensed systems
C. Tortora, E. Piedipalumbo and V. F. CardoneMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 354 (2) 343 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08160.x