Photometric signatures of highly nonconvex and binary asteroids
A&A, 404 2 (2003) 709-714
Published online: 2003-06-02
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Asteroid shape inversion with light curves using deep learning
YiJun Tang, ChenChen Ying, ChengZhe Xia, XiaoMing Zhang and XiaoJun JiangAstronomy & Astrophysics 696 A55 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452058
Light curve attitude estimation using particle swarm optimizers
Alexander Burton, Liam Robinson and Carolin FruehAdvances in Space Research 74 (11) 5619 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.008
Shapes, Rotations, Photometric and Internal Properties of Jupiter Trojans
Stefano Mottola, Daniel T. Britt, Michael E. Brown, Marc W. Buie, Keith S. Noll and Martin PätzoldSpace Science Reviews 220 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01052-7
Shape Models of Lucy Targets (3548) Eurybates and (21900) Orus from Disk-integrated Photometry
Stefano Mottola, Stephan Hellmich, Marc W. Buie, Amanda M. Zangari, Robert D. Stephens, Mario Di Martino, Gerrit Proffe, Simone Marchi, Catherine B. Olkin and Harold F. LevisonThe Planetary Science Journal 4 (1) 18 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acaf79
Refinement of the convex shape model and tumbling spin state of (99942) Apophis using the 2020–2021 apparition data
H.-J. Lee, M.-J. Kim, A. Marciniak, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 661 L3 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243442
Asteroid lightcurves: Can't tell a contact binary from a brick
Alan Harris and Brian D. WarnerIcarus 339 113602 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113602
Shape model and spin direction analysis of PHA (436724) 2011 UW158: a large superfast rotator
Filipe Monteiro, José Sergio Silva, Francisco Tamayo, Teresinha Rodrigues and Daniela LazzaroMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (4) 3990 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1401
A new look on asteroid shape modeling
Larissa V. Hradyska, Dmitry G. Stankevich, Vasilij G. Shevchenko, Yuriy G. Shkuratov and Gorden VideenPlanetary and Space Science 165 19 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2018.12.005
Homogeneous internal structure of CM-like asteroid (41) Daphne
B. Carry, F. Vachier, J. Berthier, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 623 A132 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833898
Spin states of asteroids in the Eos collisional family
J. Hanuš, M. Delbo’, V. Alí-Lagoa, et al.Icarus 299 84 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.07.007
Adaptive optics and lightcurve data of asteroids: twenty shape models and information content analysis
M. Viikinkoski, J. Hanuš, M. Kaasalainen, F. Marchis and J. ĎurechAstronomy & Astrophysics 607 A117 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731456
The global shape, density and rotation of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from preperihelion Rosetta/OSIRIS observations
L. Jorda, R. Gaskell, C. Capanna, et al.Icarus 277 257 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016.05.002
1728 020003 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948806
New and updated convex shape models of asteroids based on optical data from a large collaboration network
J. Hanuš, J. Ďurech, D. A. Oszkiewicz, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 586 A108 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527441
VLT/SPHERE- and ALMA-based shape reconstruction of asteroid (3) Juno
M. Viikinkoski, M. Kaasalainen, J. Ďurech, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 581 L3 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526626
Lightcurve analysis of asteroid (39420) Elizabethgaskell and the possible excess of long-period non-principal-axis rotators in the Hungaria population
Grigori Fedorets and Mikael GranvikPlanetary and Space Science 118 267 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.016
ADAM: a general method for using various data types in asteroid reconstruction
Matti Viikinkoski, Mikko Kaasalainen and Josef ĎurechAstronomy & Astrophysics 576 A8 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425259
A radar survey of M- and X-class asteroids. III. Insights into their composition, hydration state, & structure
Michael K. Shepard, Patrick A. Taylor, Michael C. Nolan, et al.Icarus 245 38 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.09.016
Asteroids’ physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution
J. Hanuš, J. Ďurech, M. Brož, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 551 A67 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220701
Asteroids
Mikko Kaasalainen and Josef ĎurechAsteroids 131 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39244-3_5
Compact YORP formulation and stability analysis
Mikko Kaasalainen and Hari NortunenAstronomy & Astrophysics 558 A104 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322221
Analysis of the rotation period of asteroids (1865) Cerberus, (2100) Ra-Shalom, and (3103) Eger – search for the YORP effect
J. Ďurech, D. Vokrouhlický, A. R. Baransky, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 547 A10 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219396
Shape reconstruction of irregular bodies with multiple complementary data sources
M. Kaasalainen and M. ViikinkoskiAstronomy & Astrophysics 543 A97 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219267
Optimal computation of brightness integrals parametrized on the unit sphere
M. Kaasalainen, X. Lu and A.-V. VänttinenAstronomy & Astrophysics 539 A96 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117982
Multimodal inverse problems: Maximum compatibility estimate and shape reconstruction
Mikko KaasalainenInverse Problems & Imaging 5 (1) 37 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.3934/ipi.2011.5.37
Combining asteroid models derived by lightcurve inversion with asteroidal occultation silhouettes
Josef Ďurech, Mikko Kaasalainen, David Herald, et al.Icarus 214 (2) 652 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.03.016
SPIN VECTOR AND SHAPE OF (6070) RHEINLAND AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS
David Vokrouhlický, Josef Ďurech, David Polishook, et al.The Astronomical Journal 142 (5) 159 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/159
Radar and photometric observations and shape modeling of contact binary near-Earth Asteroid (8567) 1996 HW1
Christopher Magri, Ellen S. Howell, Michael C. Nolan, Patrick A. Taylor, Yanga R. Fernández, Michael Mueller, Ronald J. Vervack, Lance A.M. Benner, Jon D. Giorgini, Steven J. Ostro, Daniel J. Scheeres, Michael D. Hicks, Heath Rhoades, James M. Somers, Ninel M. Gaftonyuk, Vladimir V. Kouprianov, Yurij N. Krugly, Igor E. Molotov, Michael W. Busch, Jean-Luc Margot, Vladimir Benishek, Vojislava Protitch-Benishek, Adrian Galád, David Higgins, Peter Kušnirák and Donald P. PrayIcarus 214 (1) 210 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.02.019
DAMIT: a database of asteroid models
J. Ďurech, V. Sidorin and M. KaasalainenAstronomy and Astrophysics 513 A46 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912693
Asteroid models from combined sparse and dense photometric data
J. Ďurech, M. Kaasalainen, B. D. Warner, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 493 (1) 291 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200810393
Datura family: the 2009 update
D. Vokrouhlický, J. Ďurech, T. Michałowski, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 507 (1) 495 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912696
Science with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array
Amy J. LovellScience with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array 191 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6935-2_35
Photometry and models of selected main belt asteroids
A. Marciniak, T. Michałowski, M. Kaasalainen, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 478 (2) 559 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20078930
Photometry of Aten asteroids—More than a handful of binaries
D. Polishook and N. BroschIcarus 194 (1) 111 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.09.022
Observations of asteroids with ALMA
Amy J. LovellAstrophysics and Space Science 313 (1-3) 191 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-007-9619-0
2007 Mutual events within the binary system of (22) Kalliope
P. Descamps, F. Marchis, J. Pollock, et al.Planetary and Space Science 56 (14) 1851 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2008.02.037
Detection of Contact Binaries Using Sparse High Phase Angle Light Curves
Pedro LacerdaThe Astrophysical Journal 672 (1) L57 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1086/526454
Physical models of ten asteroids from an observers' collaboration network
J. Ďurech, M. Kaasalainen, A. Marciniak, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 465 (1) 331 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066347
Inverse problems of generalized projection operators
Mikko Kaasalainen and Lars LambergInverse Problems 22 (3) 749 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/22/3/002
Ground reference for space remote sensing
S. Kaasalainen, M. Kaasalainen and J. PiironenAstronomy & Astrophysics 440 (3) 1177 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20053199
433 Eros – comparison of lightcurve extrema from 1901–1931 with the present rotation state
J. ĎurechAstronomy & Astrophysics 431 (1) 381 (2005)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20042095
Photometry and models of eight near-Earth asteroids
Mikko Kaasalainen, Petr Pravec, Yurij N. Krugly, et al.Icarus 167 (1) 178 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.012
Astrophysics in 2003
Virginia Trimble and Markus J. AschwandenPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 116 (817) 187 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1086/383241
CCD photometry and model of MUSES-C target (25143) 1998 SF36
M. Kaasalainen, T. Kwiatkowski, M. Abe, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 405 (3) L29 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030819
Shapes and rotational properties of thirty asteroids from photometric data
Johanna Torppa, Mikko Kaasalainen, Tadeusz Michałowski, et al.Icarus 164 (2) 346 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00146-5