Cluster mass profiles from weak lensing: The influence of substructure
A&A, 378 3 (2001) 748-755
Published online: 2001-11-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Weak lensing mass modeling bias and the impact of miscentring
Martin W Sommer, Tim Schrabback, Douglas E Applegate, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509 (1) 1127 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3052
Tests of gravity with galaxy clusters
Matteo Cataneo and David RapettiInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 27 (15) 1848006 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818480061
Mock weak lensing analysis of simulated galaxy clusters: bias and scatter in mass and concentration
Yannick M. Bahé, Ian G. McCarthy and Lindsay J. KingMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 421 (2) 1073 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20364.x
The mass-concentration relationship of virialized haloes and its impact on cosmological observables
Lindsay J. King and James M. G. MeadMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 416 (4) 2539 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19009.x
ON THE ACCURACY OF WEAK-LENSING CLUSTER MASS RECONSTRUCTIONS
Matthew R. Becker and Andrey V. KravtsovThe Astrophysical Journal 740 (1) 25 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/25
Cluster lenses
Jean-Paul Kneib and Priyamvada NatarajanThe Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 19 (1) (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00159-011-0047-3
Gravitational lensing
Matthias BartelmannClassical and Quantum Gravity 27 (23) 233001 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/23/233001
Precision cluster mass determination from weak lensing
Rachel Mandelbaum, Uroš Seljak, Tobias Baldauf and Robert E. SmithMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society no (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16619.x
LoCuSS: comparison of observed X-ray and lensing galaxy cluster scaling relations with simulations
Y.-Y. Zhang, A. Finoguenov, H. Böhringer, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 482 (2) 451 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20079103
Complex structures in galaxy cluster fields: implications for gravitational lensing mass models
Lindsay King and Virginia CorlessMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 374 (1) L37 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00260.x
Astrophysics Update 2
M. BartelmannSpringer Praxis Books, Astrophysics Update 2 213 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30313-8_7
Effects of asphericity and substructure on the determination of cluster mass with weak gravitational lensing
D. Clowe, G. De Lucia and L. KingMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 350 (3) 1038 (2004)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07723.x
How well can we determine cluster mass profiles from weak lensing?
Henk HoekstraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 339 (4) 1155 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06264.x
Parameterised models for the lensing cluster Abell 1689
L. J. King, D. I. Clowe and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 383 (1) 118 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011722
Wide field weak lensing observations of A1835 and A2204
D. Clowe and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 395 (2) 385 (2002)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20021137
Wide field weak lensing observations of A1689
D. Clowe and P. SchneiderAstronomy & Astrophysics 379 (2) 384 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011310