Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity
A&A, 369 2 (2001) 574-588
Published online: 2001-04-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Hunting Gravitational Wave Black Holes with Microlensing
Natasha S. Abrams and Masahiro TakadaThe Astrophysical Journal 905 (2) 121 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc6aa
Exploring the Energy Sources Powering the Light Curve of the Type Ibn Supernova PS15dpn and the Mass-loss History of the SN Progenitor
Shan-Qin Wang and Long LiThe Astrophysical Journal 900 (1) 83 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba6e9
The impact of stellar rotation on the black hole mass-gap from pair-instability supernovae
Pablo Marchant and Takashi J. MoriyaAstronomy & Astrophysics 640 L18 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038902
Galactic population of black holes in detached binaries with low-mass stripped helium stars: the case of LB-1 (LS V+22 25)
L R Yungelson, A G Kuranov, K A Postnov and D A KolesnikovMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 496 (1) L6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaa076
Common envelope episodes that lead to double neutron star formation
Alejandro Vigna-Gómez, Morgan MacLeod, Coenraad J. Neijssel, et al.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 37 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2020.31
Creating and using large grids of precalculated model atmospheres for a rapid analysis of stellar spectra
J. Zsargó, C. R. Fierro-Santillán, J. Klapp, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 643 A88 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038066
Forward Modeling of Double Neutron Stars: Insights from Highly Offset Short Gamma-Ray Bursts
Michael Zevin, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Anya Nugent, Wen-fai Fong, Christopher P. L. Berry and Vicky KalogeraThe Astrophysical Journal 904 (2) 190 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc266
COSMIC Variance in Binary Population Synthesis
Katelyn Breivik, Scott Coughlin, Michael Zevin, Carl L. Rodriguez, Kyle Kremer, Claire S. Ye, Jeff J. Andrews, Michael Kurkowski, Matthew C. Digman, Shane L. Larson and Frederic A. RasioThe Astrophysical Journal 898 (1) 71 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9d85
Population Synthesis of Black Hole X-Ray Binaries
Yong Shao and Xiang-Dong LiThe Astrophysical Journal 898 (2) 143 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba118
How the breakout-limited mass in B-star centrifugal magnetospheres controls their circumstellar H α emission
Stanley P Owocki, Matt E Shultz, Asif ud-Doula, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (4) 5366 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2325
Physical Processes in Star Formation
Philipp Girichidis, Stella S. R. Offner, Alexei G. Kritsuk, et al.Space Science Reviews 216 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00693-8
Is Betelgeuse the Outcome of a Past Merger?
E. Chatzopoulos, Juhan Frank, Dominic C. Marcello and Geoffrey C. ClaytonThe Astrophysical Journal 896 (1) 50 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab91bb
Massive donors in interacting binaries: effect of metallicity
Jakub Klencki, Gijs Nelemans, Alina G. Istrate and Onno PolsAstronomy & Astrophysics 638 A55 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037694
Binary Black Hole Mergers: Formation and Populations
Michela MapelliFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2020.00038
A Trend in the Effective Spin Distribution of LIGO Binary Black Holes with Mass
Mohammadtaher Safarzadeh, Will M. Farr and Enrico Ramirez-RuizThe Astrophysical Journal 894 (2) 129 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab80be
Internal circulation in tidally locked massive binary stars: Consequences for double black hole formation
B. Hastings, N. Langer and G. KoenigsbergerAstronomy & Astrophysics 641 A86 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038499
The Tarantula Massive Binary Monitoring
L. Mahy, H. Sana, M. Abdul-Masih, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 634 A118 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936151
The effects of surface fossil magnetic fields on massive star evolution – II. Implementation of magnetic braking in mesa and implications for the evolution of surface rotation in OB stars
Z Keszthelyi, G Meynet, M E Shultz, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (1) 518 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa237
Binary population synthesis models for core-collapse gamma-ray burst progenitors
A A Chrimes, E R Stanway and J J EldridgeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (3) 3479 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3246
The radial distribution of supernovae compared to star formation tracers
Fiona M Audcent-Ross, Gerhardt R Meurer, James R Audcent, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 492 (1) 848 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3282
Spin evolution of neutron stars in wind-fed high-mass X-ray binaries
Shigeyuki KarinoPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 72 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psaa087
Magnetic braking at work in binaries
W. Van Rensbergen and J. P. De GreveAstronomy & Astrophysics 642 A183 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038026
snapshot: connections between internal and surface properties of massive stars
Cyril Georgy, Sylvia Ekström, J J Eldridge, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (4) 4659 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1360
Progenitors of early-time interacting supernovae
Jose H Groh and Ioana BoianMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (2) 1325 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1540
Carina High-contrast Imaging Project for massive Stars (CHIPS)
A. Rainot, M. Reggiani, H. Sana, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 640 A15 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936448
The evolution of gamma-ray burst jet opening angle through cosmic time
Nicole Lloyd-Ronning, Valeria U Hurtado, Aycin Aykutalp, Jarrett Johnson and Chiara CeccobelloMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 4371 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1057
The origin of spin in binary black holes
Simone S. Bavera, Tassos Fragos, Ying Qin, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 635 A97 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936204
The Stellar Merger Scenario for Black Holes in the Pair-instability Gap
M. Renzo, M. Cantiello, B. D. Metzger and Y.-F. 飞 Jiang 姜燕The Astrophysical Journal Letters 904 (2) L13 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abc6a6
Short-term Variability of Evolved Massive Stars with TESS. II. A New Class of Cool, Pulsating Supergiants
Trevor Z. Dorn-Wallenstein, Emily M. Levesque, Kathryn F. Neugent, James R. A. Davenport, Brett M. Morris and Keyan GootkinThe Astrophysical Journal 902 (1) 24 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb318
Type IIP Supernova Progenitors. II. Stellar Mass and Obscuration by the Dust in the Circumstellar Medium
Gururaj A. Wagle and Alak RayThe Astrophysical Journal 889 (2) 86 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5d2c
Adiabatic Mass Loss in Binary Stars. III. From the Base of the Red Giant Branch to the Tip of the Asymptotic Giant Branch
Hongwei Ge, Ronald F Webbink, Xuefei Chen and Zhanwen HanThe Astrophysical Journal 899 (2) 132 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba7b7
GW190412 as a Third-generation Black Hole Merger from a Super Star Cluster
Carl L. Rodriguez, Kyle Kremer, Michael Y. Grudić, Zachary Hafen, Sourav Chatterjee, Giacomo Fragione, Astrid Lamberts, Miguel A. S. Martinez, Frederic A. Rasio, Newlin Weatherford and Claire S. YeThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 896 (1) L10 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab961d
Fitting formulae for evolution tracks of massive stars under extreme metal-poor environments for population synthesis calculations and star cluster simulations
Hideyuki Umeda, Koh Takahashi, Tomoya Kinugawa, Takashi Yoshida and Ataru TanikawaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (4) 4170 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1417
Why binary interaction does not necessarily dominate the formation of Wolf-Rayet stars at low metallicity
T. Shenar, A. Gilkis, J. S. Vink, H. Sana and A. A. C. SanderAstronomy & Astrophysics 634 A79 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936948
Formation rate of LB-1-like systems through dynamical interactions
Ataru Tanikawa, Tomoya Kinugawa, Jun Kumamoto and Michiko S FujiiPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 72 (3) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psaa021
Long-term evolution of a magnetic massive merger product
R Pakmor, S A Balbus, F K Röpke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (3) 2796 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1326
One star, two stars, or both? Investigating metallicity-dependent models for gamma-ray burst progenitors with the IllustrisTNG simulation
Benjamin Metha and Michele TrentiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (1) 266 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1114
Titanium and Iron in the Cassiopeia A Supernova Remnant
Gregory S. Vance, Patrick A. Young, Christopher L. Fryer and Carola I. EllingerThe Astrophysical Journal 895 (2) 82 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ade
Populating the Upper Black Hole Mass Gap through Stellar Collisions in Young Star Clusters
Kyle Kremer, Mario Spera, Devin Becker, Sourav Chatterjee, Ugo N. Di Carlo, Giacomo Fragione, Carl L. Rodriguez, Claire S. Ye and Frederic A. RasioThe Astrophysical Journal 903 (1) 45 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb945
An astrophysically motivated ranking criterion for low-latency electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational wave events
Mario Spera, Mario Pasquato, Filippo Santoliquido, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (2) 1841 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1252
Stellar-mass black holes in young massive and open stellar clusters – IV. Updated stellar-evolutionary and black hole spin models and comparisons with the LIGO-Virgo O1/O2 merger-event data
Sambaran BanerjeeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (3) 3002 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2392
On the nature of massive helium star winds and Wolf–Rayet-type mass-loss
Andreas A C Sander and Jorick S VinkMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (1) 873 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2712
Predictions for the hydrogen-free ejecta of pulsational pair-instability supernovae
M. Renzo, R. Farmer, S. Justham, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 640 A56 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037710
Pulsation-driven Mass Loss from Massive Stars behind Stellar Mergers in Metal-poor Dense Clusters
Daisuke Nakauchi, Kohei Inayoshi and Kazuyuki OmukaiThe Astrophysical Journal 902 (1) 81 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb463
Formation and Evolution of Ultraluminous X-Ray Pulsar Binaries to Pulsar–Neutron Star and Pulsar–White Dwarf Systems
K. Abdusalam, Iminhaji Ablimit, P. Hashim, G.-L Lü, M. K. Mardini and Z.-J WangThe Astrophysical Journal 902 (2) 125 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb5a8
Low-energy core-collapse supernovae in the frame of the jittering jets explosion mechanism
Noam Soker and Roni Anna GofmanMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (4) 5902 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1197
Radiation hydrodynamical simulations of eruptive mass loss from progenitors of Type Ibn/IIn supernovae
Naoto Kuriyama and Toshikazu ShigeyamaAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 A127 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937226
Evolutionary roads leading to low effective spins, high black hole masses, and O1/O2 rates for LIGO/Virgo binary black holes
K. Belczynski, J. Klencki, C. E. Fields, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 636 A104 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936528
Centrifugally driven mass-loss and outbursts of massive stars
Xihui Zhao and Jim FullerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (1) 249 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1097
On monolithic supermassive stars
Lionel Haemmerlé, Alexander Heger and Tyrone E WoodsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (2) 2236 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa763
The Most Ordinary Formation of the Most Unusual Double Black Hole Merger
Krzysztof BelczynskiThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 905 (2) L15 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abcbf1
Population Synthesis of Ultraluminous X-ray Sources with Magnetized Neutron Stars
A. G. Kuranov, K. A. Postnov and L. R. YungelsonAstronomy Letters 46 (10) 658 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773720100084
Characterizing dynamical states of Galactic open clusters with Gaia DR2
M S Angelo, W J B Corradi, J F C Santos, F F S Maia and F A FerreiraMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (4) 4338 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3192
Stellar wind models of central stars of planetary nebulae
J. Krtička, J. Kubát and I. KrtičkováAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 A173 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937150
Theoretical investigation of the Humphreys–Davidson limit at high and low metallicity
Erin R. Higgins and Jorick S. VinkAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 A175 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937374
Modeling Dense Star Clusters in the Milky Way and Beyond with the CMC Cluster Catalog
Kyle Kremer, Claire S. Ye, Nicholas Z. Rui, Newlin C. Weatherford, Sourav Chatterjee, Giacomo Fragione, Carl L. Rodriguez, Mario Spera and Frederic A. RasioThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 247 (2) 48 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab7919
On the Origin of GW190521-like Events from Repeated Black Hole Mergers in Star Clusters
Giacomo Fragione, Abraham Loeb and Frederic A. RasioThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 902 (1) L26 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abbc0a
Mass and star formation rate of the host galaxies of compact binary mergers across cosmic time
M Celeste Artale, Michela Mapelli, Yann Bouffanais, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (3) 3419 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3190
The fates of massive stars: exploring uncertainties in stellar evolution with metisse
Poojan Agrawal, Jarrod Hurley, Simon Stevenson, Dorottya Szécsi and Chris FlynnMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (4) 4549 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2264
How runaway stars boost galactic outflows
Florent Renaud, Oscar Agertz and Eric P AnderssonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 3328 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa889
Challenges in 2D Stellar Modeling
Catherine C. LovekinFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2019.00077
Exploring the Lower Mass Gap and Unequal Mass Regime in Compact Binary Evolution
Michael Zevin, Mario Spera, Christopher P L Berry and Vicky KalogeraThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 899 (1) L1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aba74e
Demographics of Triple Systems in Dense Star Clusters
Giacomo Fragione, Miguel A. S. Martinez, Kyle Kremer, Sourav Chatterjee, Carl L. Rodriguez, Claire S. Ye, Newlin C. Weatherford, Smadar Naoz and Frederic A. RasioThe Astrophysical Journal 900 (1) 16 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba89b
The Origin of Inequality: Isolated Formation of a 30+10 M ⊙ Binary Black Hole Merger
A. Olejak, M. Fishbach, K. Belczynski, D. E. Holz, J.-P. Lasota, M. C. Miller and T. BulikThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 901 (2) L39 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abb5b5
Progenitor properties of type II supernovae: fitting to hydrodynamical models using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods
L. Martinez, M. C. Bersten, J. P. Anderson, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 642 A143 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038393
Sensitivity of 44Ti and 56Ni Production in Core-collapse Supernova Shock-driven Nucleosynthesis to Nuclear Reaction Rate Variations
Shiv K. Subedi, Zach Meisel and Grant MerzThe Astrophysical Journal 898 (1) 5 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9745
The R136 star cluster dissected with Hubble Space Telescope/STIS – II. Physical properties of the most massive stars in R136
Joachim M Bestenlehner, Paul A Crowther, Saida M Caballero-Nieves, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (2) 1918 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2801
FRB Periodicity: Mild Pulsars in Tight O/B-star Binaries
Maxim Lyutikov, Maxim V. Barkov and Dimitrios GianniosThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 893 (2) L39 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab87a4
Optical and near-infrared observations of the Fried Egg Nebula
E. Koumpia, R. D. Oudmaijer, V. Graham, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 635 A183 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936177
Relative importance of convective uncertainties in massive stars
Etienne A Kaiser, Raphael Hirschi, W David Arnett, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (2) 1967 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1595
Massive Black Holes Regulated by Luminous Blue Variable Mass Loss and Magnetic Fields
Jose H. Groh, Eoin J. Farrell, Georges Meynet, Nathan Smith, Laura Murphy, Andrew P. Allan, Cyril Georgy and Sylvia EkstroemThe Astrophysical Journal 900 (2) 98 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aba2c8
What binary systems are the most likely sources for periodically repeating FRBs?
He Gao and Xianfei ZhangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 498 (1) L1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaa116
Helium and nitrogen enrichment in massive main-sequence stars: mechanisms and implications for the origin of WNL stars
Arpita Roy, Ralph S Sutherland, Mark R Krumholz, Alexander Heger and Michael A DopitaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 3861 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa781
Eccentric grazing envelope evolution towards Type IIb supernova progenitors
Dmitry Shishkin and Noam SokerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (1) 855 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2080
Constraining mixing in massive stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud
A. Schootemeijer, N. Langer, N. J. Grin and C. WangAstronomy & Astrophysics 625 A132 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935046
Theoretical wind clumping predictions of OB supergiants from line-driven instability simulations across the bi-stability jump
F. A. Driessen, J. O. Sundqvist and N. D. KeeAstronomy & Astrophysics 631 A172 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936331
Predicting the LISA white dwarf binary population in the Milky Way with cosmological simulations
Astrid Lamberts, Sarah Blunt, Tyson B Littenberg, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (4) 5888 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2834
Low-metallicity massive single stars with rotation
B. Kubátová, D. Szécsi, A. A. C. Sander, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 623 A8 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834360
Interaction of a supernova remnant with a wind of young massive star: MHD simulations
D V Badmaev and A M BykovJournal of Physics: Conference Series 1400 (2) 022033 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1400/2/022033
Measurement of the Core-collapse Progenitor Mass Distribution of the Small Magellanic Cloud
Katie Auchettl, Laura A. Lopez, Carles Badenes, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, John F. Beacom and Tyler Holland-AshfordThe Astrophysical Journal 871 (1) 64 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf395
On the possibility of disk-fed formation in supergiant high-mass X-ray binaries
Ali Taani, Shigeyuki Karino, Liming Song, et al.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 19 (1) 012 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/19/1/12
Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap
R. Farmer, M. Renzo, S. E. de Mink, P. Marchant and S. JusthamThe Astrophysical Journal 887 (1) 53 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b
The Fate of Binaries in the Galactic Center: The Mundane and the Exotic
Alexander P. Stephan, Smadar Naoz, Andrea M. Ghez, Mark R. Morris, Anna Ciurlo, Tuan Do, Katelyn Breivik, Scott Coughlin and Carl L. RodriguezThe Astrophysical Journal 878 (1) 58 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1e4d
Comparison of the optical light curves of hydrogen-rich and hydrogen-poor type II supernovae
M D Stritzinger, N Suntzeff, M M Phillips, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (3) 4239 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1855
Supernovae
Poonam ChandraSpace Sciences Series of ISSI, Supernovae 68 173 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1581-0_9
Chandra and Hubble Space Telescope observations of dark gamma-ray bursts and their host galaxies
K Wiersema, P J Wheatley, N R Tanvir, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (3) 3105 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1039
Dependence of convective boundary mixing on boundary properties and turbulence strength
A Cristini, R Hirschi, C Meakin, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (4) 4645 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz312
Critical angular velocity and anisotropic mass loss of rotating stars with radiation-driven winds
D. Gagnier, M. Rieutord, C. Charbonnel, B. Putigny and F. Espinosa LaraAstronomy & Astrophysics 625 A88 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834599
Bow shocks, bow waves, and dust waves – I. Strong coupling limit
William J Henney and S J ArthurMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (3) 3423 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1043
One-, Two-, and Three-dimensional Simulations of Oxygen-shell Burning Just before the Core Collapse of Massive Stars
Takashi Yoshida, Tomoya Takiwaki, Kei Kotake, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 881 (1) 16 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b9d
Magnetic inhibition of convection in O-star envelopes
Véronique Petit and James MacDonaldMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (3) 3904 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1545
Wind Roche lobe overflow in high-mass X-ray binaries
I. El Mellah, J. O. Sundqvist and R. KeppensAstronomy & Astrophysics 622 L3 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201834543
Host galaxies of merging compact objects: mass, star formation rate, metallicity, and colours
M Celeste Artale, Michela Mapelli, Nicola Giacobbo, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (2) 1675 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1382
New Insights on Lyα and Lyman Continuum Radiative Transfer in the Greenest Peas*
Anne E. Jaskot, Tara Dowd, M. S. Oey, Claudia Scarlata and Jed McKinneyThe Astrophysical Journal 885 (1) 96 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d3b
Constraints on the production and escape of ionizing radiation from the emission-line spectra of metal-poor star-forming galaxies
A Plat, S Charlot, G Bruzual, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (1) 978 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2616
mocca survey data base– i. Dissolution of tidally filling star clusters harbouring black hole subsystems
M Giersz, A Askar, L Wang, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (2) 2412 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1460
Mass-loss Rates for O and Early B Stars Powering Bow Shock Nebulae: Evidence for Bistability Behavior
Henry A. Kobulnicky, William T. Chick and Matthew S. PovichThe Astronomical Journal 158 (2) 73 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab2716
Mass transfer on a nuclear timescale in models of supergiant and ultra-luminous X-ray binaries
M. Quast, N. Langer and T. M. TaurisAstronomy & Astrophysics 628 A19 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935453
The Impact of Pair-instability Mass Loss on the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution
Simon Stevenson, Matthew Sampson, Jade Powell, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 882 (2) 121 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3981
Black hole spins in coalescing binary black holes
K A Postnov and A G KuranovMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 483 (3) 3288 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3313