Euclid: Forecast constraints on the cosmic distance duality relation with complementary external probes
A&A, 644 (2020) A80
Published online: 2020-12-02
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
BAO vs. SN evidence for evolving dark energy
Alessio Notari, Michele Redi and Andrea TesiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (04) 048 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/04/048
Resilience and implications of adiabatic CMB cooling
Ruchika, William Giarè, Elsa M. Teixeira and Alessandro MelchiorriPhysics of the Dark Universe 101999 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101999
Temperature-redshift relation in energy-momentum-powered gravity models
C. J. A. P. Martins and A. M. M. VieiraPhysical Review D 111 (4) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.043533
The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
Eleonora Di Valentino and Jackson Levi SaidPhysics of the Dark Universe 101965 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965
New Tests of the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation with DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Observations
Qiumin Wang, Shuo Cao, Jianyong Jiang, Kaituo Zhang, Xinyue Jiang, Tonghua Liu, Chengsheng Mu and Dadian ChengThe Astrophysical Journal 987 (1) 58 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ade2ce
Cosmological model with a parametrization of the hubble parameter in f(R,T) theory of gravity
Bhupendra Kumar Shukla, Aroonkumar Beesham, Değer Sofuoğlu, Preeti Mishra and R. K. DubeyInternational Journal of Modern Physics A 40 (17) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X25500484
Implications of distance duality violation for the H0 tension and evolving dark energy
Elsa M. Teixeira, William Giarè, Natalie B. Hogg, Thomas Montandon, Adèle Poudou and Vivian PoulinPhysical Review D 112 (2) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1103/zzmp-rxrh
Cosmological dynamics of FRW universe in presence of tachyonic field
Anup Kumar Singha, Alok Sardar, Ujjal Debnath and Anirudh PradhanPhysica Scripta 100 (1) 015038 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad9e3b
Impact of Interacting Parameters on Dark Matter in an Interacting Dark Energy Model
Himanshu Chaudhary, Ritika Nagpal, S. K. J. Pacif and G. MustafaThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 278 (1) 22 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/adc679
Constraints on the parameters of modified Chaplygin–Jacobi and modified Chaplygin–Abel gases in f(T) gravity
Himanshu Chaudhary, Ujjal Debnath, Tanusree Roy, Sayani Maity, G. Mustafa and Monika AroraInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 21 (14) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887824502487
Machine learning unveils the linear matter power spectrum of modified gravity
J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana, Savvas Nesseris and Domenico SaponePhysical Review D 109 (6) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063511
Quantification of 2D vs 3D BAO tension using SNIa as a redshift interpolator and test of the Etherington relation
Arianna Favale, Adrià Gómez-Valent and Marina MigliaccioPhysics Letters B 858 139027 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139027
Cosmic evolution in f(Q,T) gravity with observational constraints: A comparative analysis with ΛCDM
B.K. Shukla, Değer Sofuoğlu, Himanshu Chaudhary, Farruh Atamurotov and G. MustafaJournal of High Energy Astrophysics 43 1 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2024.05.004
Exploring the deceleration parameter in f(T) gravity: A comprehensive analysis using parametrization techniques and observational data
Himanshu Chaudhary, Amine Bouali, Hülya Duru, Ertan Güdekli and G. MustafaInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 21 (09) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887824501664
Significance of a quadratically varying deceleration parameter in scalar field-dominated model and cosmic acceleration
Keshav Ram Mishra, Himanshu Chaudhary, Rajesh Kumar, Z. Nekouee and Shibesh Kumar Jas PacifModern Physics Letters A 39 (19n20) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732324500871
Constraints on the Minimally Extended Varying Speed of Light Model Using Pantheon+ Dataset
Seokcheon LeeUniverse 10 (6) 268 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10060268
Diagnostic and comparative analysis of dark energy models with q(z) parametrizations
Dhruv Arora, Himanshu Chaudhary, Shibesh Kumar Jas Pacif and G. MustafaThe European Physical Journal Plus 139 (5) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05163-6
Current and future cosmological impact of microwave background temperature measurements
C.J.A.P. Martins and A.M.M. VieiraPhysics of the Dark Universe 44 101494 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101494
Review on Minimally Extended Varying Speed of Light Model
Seokcheon LeeParticles 7 (2) 309 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/particles7020019
Exploring Late‐Time Cosmic Acceleration with Eos Parameterizations in Horava‐Lifshitz Gravity via Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
Madhur Khurana, Himanshu Chaudhary, Ujjal Debnath, Alok Sardar and Ghulam MustafaFortschritte der Physik 72 (2) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202300238
Cosmological test of dark energy parameterizations in Hořava–Lifshitz gravity
Himanshu Chaudhary, Niyaz Uddin Molla, Madhur Khurana, Ujjal Debnath and G. MustafaThe European Physical Journal C 84 (3) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12504-3
Cosmic evolution in f(Q,T) gravity: Exploring a higher-order time-dependent function of deceleration parameter with observational constraints
Madhur Khurana, Himanshu Chaudhary, Saadia Mumtaz, S.K.J. Pacif and G. MustafaPhysics of the Dark Universe 43 101408 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101408
Consistent theories for the DESI dark energy fit
Alessio Notari, Michele Redi and Andrea TesiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (11) 025 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/11/025
Data analysis of three parameter models of deceleration parameter in FLRW universe
Amine Bouali, Himanshu Chaudhary, Ujjal Debnath, Alok Sardar and G. MustafaThe European Physical Journal Plus 138 (9) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04442-y
(2023)
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3193794/v1
Constraints on the parameterized deceleration parameter in FRW universe
Himanshu Chaudhary, Amine Bouali, Ujjal Debnath, Tanusree Roy and G MustafaPhysica Scripta 98 (9) 095006 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/acea02
Machine learning cosmic inflation
Ahana Kamerkar, Savvas Nesseris and Lucas PinolPhysical Review D 108 (4) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.043509
Parametrization of the deceleration parameter in a flat FLRW universe: constraints and comparative analysis with the $$\Lambda $$CDM paradigm
Himanshu Chaudhary, Saadia Mumtaz, Amine Bouali, Ujjal Debnath and G. MustafaGeneral Relativity and Gravitation 55 (11) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-023-03181-w
Observational Constraining Study of New Deceleration Parameters in FRW Universe
Amine Bouali, Himanshu Chaudhary, Saadia Mumtaz, G. Mustafa and S. K. MauryaFortschritte der Physik 71 (10-11) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202300033
Using machine learning to compress the matter transfer function T(k)
J. Bayron Orjuela-Quintana, Savvas Nesseris and Wilmar CardonaPhysical Review D 107 (8) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.083520
What are recent observations telling us in light of improved tests of distance duality relation?
Tonghua Liu, Shuo Cao, Shuai Ma, Yuting Liu, Chenfa Zheng and Jieci WangPhysics Letters B 838 137687 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137687
Hyperbolic Scenario of Accelerating Universe in Modified Gravity
Raja Azhar Ashraaf Khan, Rishi Kumar Tiwari, Jumi Bharali, et al.Symmetry 15 (6) 1238 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15061238
Model‐Independent Study for a Quintessence Model of Dark Energy: Analysis and Observational Constraints
Amine Bouali, Himanshu Chaudhary, Amritansh Mehrotra and Shibesh Kumar Jas PacifFortschritte der Physik 71 (12) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202300086
Exploring the possibility of interacting quintessence model as an alternative to the $$\Lambda $$CDM model
Nandan RoyGeneral Relativity and Gravitation 55 (10) (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-023-03160-1
Distance Duality Test: The Evolution of Radio Sources Mimics a Nonexpanding Universe
Pengfei LiThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 950 (2) L14 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdb49
Euclid: Testing the Copernican principle with next-generation surveys
D. Camarena, V. Marra, Z. Sakr, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 671 A68 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244557
Measurements of the Hubble constant from combinations of supernovae and radio quasars
Tonghua Liu, Xiyan Yang, Zisheng Zhang, Jieci Wang and Marek BiesiadaPhysics Letters B 845 138166 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138166
Climbing out of the shadows: Building the distance ladder with black hole images
Fabrizio Renzi and Matteo MartinelliPhysics of the Dark Universe 37 101104 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2022.101104
Testing the ΛCDM paradigm with growth rate data and machine learning
Rubén Arjona, Alessandro Melchiorri and Savvas NesserisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022 (05) 047 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/05/047
Challenges for ΛCDM: An update
L. Perivolaropoulos and F. SkaraNew Astronomy Reviews 95 101659 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659
Euclid: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the ΛCDM model
S. Nesseris, D. Sapone, M. Martinelli, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 660 A67 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202142503
The resilience of the Etherington–Hubble relation
Fabrizio Renzi, Natalie B Hogg and William GiarèMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513 (3) 4004 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1030
Machine learning constraints on deviations from general relativity from the large scale structure of the Universe
George Alestas, Lavrentios Kazantzidis and Savvas NesserisPhysical Review D 106 (10) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103519
Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies
Elcio Abdalla, Guillermo Franco Abellán, Amin Aboubrahim, et al.Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 34 49 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002
Cosmological impact of microwave background temperature measurements
L. Gelo, C.J.A.P. Martins, N. Quevedo and A.M.M. VieiraPhysics Letters B 835 137570 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137570
Distance-duality in theories with a nonminimal coupling to gravity
R. P. L. Azevedo and P. P. AvelinoPhysical Review D 104 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084079
Revisiting the cosmic distance duality relation with machine learning reconstruction methods: the combination of HII galaxies and ultra-compact radio quasars
Tonghua Liu, Shuo Cao, Sixuan Zhang, et al.The European Physical Journal C 81 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09713-5
Euclid: Constraining dark energy coupled to electromagnetism using astrophysical and laboratory data
M. Martinelli, C. J. A. P. Martins, S. Nesseris, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 654 A148 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141353
Testing fundamental cosmological assumptions with Euclid
M Martinelli, C J A P Martins, S Nesseris, et al.Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2156 (1) 012019 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2156/1/012019
Machine learning forecasts of the cosmic distance duality relation with strongly lensed gravitational wave events
Rubén Arjona, Hai-Nan Lin, Savvas Nesseris and Li TangPhysical Review D 103 (10) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103513
Testing late-time cosmic acceleration with uncorrelated baryon acoustic oscillation dataset
David Benisty and Denitsa StaicovaAstronomy & Astrophysics 647 A38 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039502
Cosmological Tests of Gravity: A Future Perspective
Matteo Martinelli and Santiago CasasUniverse 7 (12) 506 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7120506
Machine learning improved fits of the sound horizon at the baryon drag epoch
Andoni Aizpuru, Rubén Arjona and Savvas NesserisPhysical Review D 104 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043521
Testing the general theory of relativity using gravitational wave propagation from dark standard sirens
Suvodip Mukherjee, Benjamin D Wandelt and Joseph SilkMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (1) 1136 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab001
Quintessential inflation and cosmological seesaw mechanism: reheating and observational constraints
L. Aresté Saló, D. Benisty, E.I. Guendelman and J.d. HaroJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (07) 007 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/007
α -attractors in quintessential inflation motivated by supergravity
L. Aresté Saló, D. Benisty, E. I. Guendelman and J. d. HaroPhysical Review D 103 (12) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123535