Planck 2015 results - XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
A&A, 594 (2016) A11
Published online: 2016-09-20
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
CMB statistical isotropy confirmation at all scales using multipole vectors
Renan A. Oliveira, Thiago S. Pereira and Miguel QuartinPhysics of the Dark Universe 30 100608 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2020.100608
Quantifying the impacts of future gravitational-wave data on constraining interacting dark energy
Hai-Li Li, Dong-Ze He, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (06) 038 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/038
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833886
Improved model-independent constraints on the recombination era and development of a direct projection method
Jens Chluba and Luke HartMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (4) 4210 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1426
Can dark neutrino interactions phase out the Hubble tension?
Subhajit Ghosh, Rishi Khatri and Tuhin S. RoyPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123544
Neutrino puzzle: Anomalies, interactions, and cosmological tensions
Christina D. Kreisch, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine and Olivier DoréPhysical Review D 101 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.123505
CMB and BBN constraints on evaporating primordial black holes revisited
Sandeep Kumar Acharya and Rishi KhatriJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (06) 018 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/018
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
Simone Aiola, Erminia Calabrese, Loïc Maurin, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (12) 047 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/047
Exploring neutrino mass and mass hierarchy in interacting dark energy models
Lu Feng, Hai-Li Li, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-9431-9
Constraints on decaying dark matter from weak lensing and cluster counts
Kari Enqvist, Seshadri Nadathur, Toyokazu Sekiguchi and Tomo TakahashiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (04) 015 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/015
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833880
Lensinglike tensions in the Planck legacy release
Pavel Motloch and Wayne HuPhysical Review D 101 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083515
How much primordial tensor mode is allowed?
Moumita Aich, Yin-Zhe Ma, Wei-Ming Dai and Jun-Qing XiaPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063536
Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: A resolution with novel signatures
Tristan L. Smith, Vivian Poulin and Mustafa A. AminPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063523
Reionization optical depth determination from Planck HFI data with ten percent accuracy
L. Pagano, J.-M. Delouis, S. Mottet, J.-L. Puget and L. VibertAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 A99 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936630
Forecast constraints on anisotropic stress in dark energy using gravitational waves
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, David F Mota and Minghui DuMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (1) 879 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1859
Likelihood Methods for CMB Experiments
Martina Gerbino, Massimiliano Lattanzi, Marina Migliaccio, et al.Frontiers in Physics 8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00015
How sound are our ultralight axion approximations?
Tessa Cookmeyer, Daniel Grin and Tristan L. SmithPhysical Review D 101 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.023501
Theoretical priors in scalar-tensor cosmologies: Thawing quintessence
Carlos García-García, Emilio Bellini, Pedro G. Ferreira, Dina Traykova and Miguel ZumalacárreguiPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063508
Cosmological constraints on dark energy in light of gravitational wave bounds
Johannes NollerPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063524
Positivity in the Sky: Constraining dark energy and modified gravity from the UV
S. Melville and J. NollerPhysical Review D 101 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.021502
Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance
J. Colin Hill, Evan McDonough, Michael W. Toomey and Stephon AlexanderPhysical Review D 102 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043507
Reconstructing gravity on cosmological scales
Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 101 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083524
Parameter estimation in cosmic string spacetime by using the inertial and accelerated detectors
Ying Yang, Jieci Wang, Mengjie Wang, Jiliang Jing and Zehua TianClassical and Quantum Gravity 37 (6) 065017 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab6f73
Testing H0 in acoustic dark energy models with Planck and ACT polarization data
Meng-Xiang Lin, Wayne Hu and Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123523
Hybrid-basis inference for large-scale galaxy clustering: combining spherical and Cartesian Fourier analyses
M.S. Wang, S. Avila, D. Bianchi, R. Crittenden and W.J. PercivalJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 022 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/022
The BAHAMAS project: effects of dynamical dark energy on large-scale structure
Simon Pfeifer, Ian G McCarthy, Sam G Stafford, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (2) 1576 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2240
Forecasting interacting vacuum-energy models using gravitational waves
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, Eleonora Di Valentino, Bin Wang and Anzhong WangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (05) 050 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/050
Phenomenology of the generalized cubic covariant Galileon model and cosmological bounds
Noemi Frusciante, Simone Peirone, Luís Atayde and Antonio De FelicePhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.064001
Updating constraints on f(T) teleparallel cosmology and the consistency with big bang nucleosynthesis
Micol Benetti, Salvatore Capozziello and Gaetano LambiaseMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (2) 1795 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3368
Radiative stability and observational constraints on dark energy and modified gravity
J. Noller and A. NicolaPhysical Review D 102 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104045
Scalar-tensor theories of gravity, neutrino physics, and the H0 tension
Mario Ballardini, Matteo Braglia, Fabio Finelli, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 044 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/044
Reconciling H0 tension in a six parameter space?
Supriya Pan, Weiqiang Yang, Eleonora Di Valentino, Arman Shafieloo and Subenoy ChakrabortyJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (06) 062 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/062
Reionization inference from the CMB optical depth and E-mode polarization power spectra
Yuxiang Qin, Vivian Poulin, Andrei Mesinger, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (1) 550 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2797
Alleviating the H0 and σ8 anomalies with a decaying dark matter model
Kanhaiya L. Pandey, Tanvi Karwal and Subinoy DasJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (07) 026 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/026
Gaussian processes reconstruction of modified gravitational wave propagation
Enis Belgacem, Stefano Foffa, Michele Maggiore and Tao YangPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063505
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A11 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832618
An SU(2) Gauge Principle for the Cosmic Microwave Background: Perspectives on the Dark Sector of the Cosmological Model
Ralf HofmannUniverse 6 (9) 135 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe6090135
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A6 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
A novel CMB polarization likelihood package for large angular scales built from combined WMAP and Planck LFI legacy maps
U. Natale, L. Pagano, M. Lattanzi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 644 A32 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038508
Probing dark matter with future CMB measurements
Junsong Cang, Yu Gao and Yin-Zhe MaPhysical Review D 102 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103005
Anomalous spectral lines and relic quantum nonequilibrium
Nicolas G. Underwood and Antony ValentiniPhysical Review D 101 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043004
Constraints on Circumgalactic Media from Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Effects and X-Ray Data
Xuanyi Wu, Houjun Mo, Cheng Li and Seunghwan LimThe Astrophysical Journal 903 (1) 26 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abb80d
Predictions of Cosmic Microwave Background Foreground Dust Polarization Using Velocity Gradients
Yue Hu, Ka Ho Yuen and A. LazarianThe Astrophysical Journal 888 (2) 96 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab60a5
Constraining early dark energy with large-scale structure
Mikhail M. Ivanov, Evan McDonough, J. Colin Hill, et al.Physical Review D 102 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103502
Reassessing dust’s role in forming the CMB
F. MeliaThe European Physical Journal Plus 135 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00533-2
Detection of Missing Baryons in Galaxy Groups with Kinetic Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Effect
S. H. Lim, H. J. Mo, Huiyuan Wang and Xiaohu YangThe Astrophysical Journal 889 (1) 48 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab63df
Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from the 500 deg2 SPTPOL Lensing Power Spectrum
F. Bianchini, W. L. K. Wu, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, E. M. George, A. Gilbert, N. Gupta, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 888 (2) 119 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6082
Constraints on the Velocity Dispersion of Dark Matter from Cosmology and New Bounds on Scattering from the Cosmic Dawn
Iván Rodríguez-Montoya, Vladimir Avila-Reese, Abdel Pérez-Lorenzana and Jorge VenzorThe Astrophysical Journal 894 (1) 40 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab67d0
A probabilistic framework for cosmological inference of peculiar velocities
Lawrence DamMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 497 (2) 1301 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2040
Impact of polarised extragalactic sources on the measurement of CMBB-mode anisotropies
G. Lagache, M. Béthermin, L. Montier, P. Serra and M. TucciAstronomy & Astrophysics 642 A232 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937147
Post-inflationary axion isocurvature perturbations facing CMB and large-scale structure
M. Feix, S. Hagstotz, A. Pargner, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (11) 046 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/11/046
The Cosmic Lithium Story
Katharina LoddersElements 16 (4) 241 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.2138/gselements.16.4.241
Dark sectors with dynamical coupling
Weiqiang Yang, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan and Eleonora Di ValentinoPhysical Review D 100 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083509
Entropy production in inflation from spectator loops
Pavel Friedrich and Tomislav ProkopecPhysical Review D 100 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083505
Joint Bayesian analysis of large angular scale CMB temperature anomalies
Shabbir Shaikh, Suvodip Mukherjee, Santanu Das, Benjamin D. Wandelt and Tarun SouradeepJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (08) 007 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/007
Time-varying neutrino mass from a supercooled phase transition: Current cosmological constraints and impact on the Ωm−σ8 plane
Christiane S. Lorenz, Lena Funcke, Erminia Calabrese and Steen HannestadPhysical Review D 99 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.023501
Likelihood non-Gaussianity in large-scale structure analyses
ChangHoon Hahn, Florian Beutler, Manodeep Sinha, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (2) 2956 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz558
Sub-GeV dark matter model
Bhaskar Dutta, Sumit Ghosh and Jason KumarPhysical Review D 100 (7) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.075028
Tuning goodness-of-fit tests†
A Arrasmith, B Follin, E Anderes and L KnoxMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (2) 1889 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz066
Probing Cosmic Origins with CO and [C ii] Emission Lines
Azadeh Moradinezhad Dizgah, Garrett K. Keating and Anastasia FialkovThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 870 (1) L4 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaf813
General solutions of the leakage in integral transforms and applications to the EB-leakage and detection of the cosmological gravitational wave background
Hao LiuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10) 001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/001
Effects of anisotropic stress in interacting dark matter – dark energy scenarios
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, Lixin Xu and David F MotaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482 (2) 1858 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2789
Doubly blind spots in scalar dark matter models
Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Brian Maddock and Stefano ProfumoPhysical Review D 100 (5) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.055033
Acoustic dark energy: Potential conversion of the Hubble tension
Meng-Xiang Lin, Giampaolo Benevento, Wayne Hu and Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 100 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063542
Reheating in quintessential inflation via gravitational production of heavy massive particles: a detailed analysis
Jaume Haro, Weiqiang Yang and Supriya PanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (01) 023 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/023
More out of less: an excess integrated Sachs–Wolfe signal from supervoids mapped out by the Dark Energy Survey
A Kovács, C Sánchez, J García-Bellido, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (4) 5267 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz341
MontePython 3: Boosted MCMC sampler and other features
Thejs Brinckmann and Julien LesgourguesPhysics of the Dark Universe 24 100260 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.100260
Efficient optimal reconstruction of linear fields and band-powers from cosmological data
B. Horowitz, U. Seljak and G. AslanyanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10) 035 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/035
Modeling the large-scale power deficit with smooth and discontinuous primordial spectra
Sandro D. P. Vitenti, Patrick Peter and Antony ValentiniPhysical Review D 100 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043506
Constraints on the primordial curvature power spectrum from primordial black holes
Gabriela Sato-Polito, Ely D. Kovetz and Marc KamionkowskiPhysical Review D 100 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063521
Ultrahigh energy cosmic rays and neutrinos from light nuclei composition
Saikat Das, Soebur Razzaque and Nayantara GuptaPhysical Review D 99 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083015
Cosmology and dark energy from joint gravitational wave-GRB observations
Enis Belgacem, Yves Dirian, Stefano Foffa, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (08) 015 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/015
Cosmological data favor Galileon ghost condensate over ΛCDM
Simone Peirone, Giampaolo Benevento, Noemi Frusciante and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 100 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063540
Swampland conjectures and late-time cosmology
Marco Raveri, Wayne Hu and Savdeep SethiPhysical Review D 99 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083518
Disconnected pseudo-Cℓ covariances for projected large-scale structure data
Carlos García-García, David Alonso and Emilio BelliniJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (11) 043 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/043
Testing extended Jordan-Brans-Dicke theories with future cosmological observations
M. Ballardini, D. Sapone, C. Umiltà, F. Finelli and D. PaolettiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 049 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/049
Sounds Discordant: Classical Distance Ladder and ΛCDM-based Determinations of the Cosmological Sound Horizon
Kevin Aylor, Mackenzie Joy, Lloyd Knox, Marius Millea, Srinivasan Raghunathan and W. L. Kimmy WuThe Astrophysical Journal 874 (1) 4 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0898
Study of systematics effects on the cross power spectrum of 21 cm line and cosmic microwave background using Murchison Widefield Array data
S Yoshiura, K Ichiki, B Pindor, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 483 (2) 2697 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3248
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Mustapha IshakLiving Reviews in Relativity 22 (1) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4
Listening to the sound of dark sector interactions with gravitational wave standard sirens
Weiqiang Yang, Sunny Vagnozzi, Eleonora Di Valentino, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (07) 037 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/037
Primordial features from ekpyrotic bounces
Rathul Nath Raveendran and L. SriramkumarPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043527
The Santiago–Harvard–Edinburgh–Durham void comparison II: unveiling the Vainshtein screening using weak lensing
Enrique Paillas, Marius Cautun, Baojiu Li, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (1) 1149 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz022
Is the lack of power anomaly in the CMB correlated with the orientation of the Galactic plane?
U. Natale, A. Gruppuso, D. Molinari and P. NatoliJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (12) 052 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/052
K-mouflage imprints on cosmological observables and data constraints
Giampaolo Benevento, Marco Raveri, Andrei Lazanu, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 027 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/027
Quantifying dimensionality: Bayesian cosmological model complexities
Will Handley and Pablo LemosPhysical Review D 100 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023512
Point source detection and false discovery rate control on CMB maps
J. Carrón Duque, A. Buzzelli, Y. Fantaye, et al.Astronomy and Computing 28 100310 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2019.100310
ΛCDM or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart
Minsu Park, Christina D. Kreisch, Jo Dunkley, Boryana Hadzhiyska and Francis-Yan Cyr-RacinePhysical Review D 100 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063524
Estimation of spectrum and parameters of relic gravitational waves using space-borne interferometers
Bo Wang and Yang ZhangResearch in Astronomy and Astrophysics 19 (2) 024 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/19/2/24
Weak-lensing mass calibration of the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect using APEX-SZ galaxy clusters
B Westbrook, C Tucker, C L Reichardt, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 1728 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1904
MGCAMB with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy
A. Zucca, L. Pogosian, A. Silvestri and G.B. ZhaoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/001
Primordial features from linear to nonlinear scales
Florian Beutler, Matteo Biagetti, Daniel Green, Anže Slosar and Benjamin WallischPhysical Review Research 1 (3) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033209
Search for sterile neutrinos in a universe of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter
Lu Feng, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangPhysics of the Dark Universe 23 100261 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.100261
Line Intensity Mapping with [C ii] and CO(1-0) as Probes of Primordial Non-Gaussianity
Azadeh Moradinezhad Dizgah and Garrett K. KeatingThe Astrophysical Journal 872 (2) 126 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aafd36
Early Dark Energy can Resolve the Hubble Tension
Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Tanvi Karwal and Marc KamionkowskiPhysical Review Letters 122 (22) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.221301
Observational constraints on one-parameter dynamical dark-energy parametrizations and the H0 tension
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, Eleonora Di Valentino, Emmanuel N. Saridakis and Subenoy ChakrabortyPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043543
Cosmological constraints and phenomenology of a beyond-Horndeski model
Simone Peirone, Giampaolo Benevento, Noemi Frusciante and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 100 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063509
Perturbations and Quantum Relaxation
Adithya Kandhadai and Antony ValentiniFoundations of Physics 49 (1) 1 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0227-3
Improved renormalization group computation of likelihood functions for cosmological data sets
Patrick McDonaldPhysical Review D 100 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043511
An interacting dark sector and the implications of the first gravitational-wave standard siren detection on current constraints
Jurgen Mifsud and Carsten van de BruckMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (1) 900 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1293