Planck 2015 results - XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
A&A, 594 (2016) A11
Published online: 2016-09-20
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Constraints on prerecombination early dark energy from SPT-3G public data
Adrien La Posta, Thibaut Louis, Xavier Garrido and J. Colin HillPhysical Review D 105 (8) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083519
CMB power spectra and cosmological parameters from Planck PR4 with CamSpec
Erik Rosenberg, Steven Gratton and George EfstathiouMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 517 (3) 4620 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2744
The First Direct Measurement of Gravitational Potential Decay Rate at Cosmological Scales and Improved Dark Energy Constraint
Fuyu Dong, Pengjie Zhang, Zeyang Sun and Changbom ParkThe Astrophysical Journal 938 (1) 72 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac905b
New Constraint on Early Dark Energy from Planck and BOSS Data Using the Profile Likelihood
Laura Herold, Elisa G. M. Ferreira and Eiichiro KomatsuThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 929 (1) L16 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac63a3
Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Constraints on prerecombination early dark energy
J. Colin Hill, Erminia Calabrese, Simone Aiola, et al.Physical Review D 105 (12) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.123536
Improved limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio using BICEP and Planck data
M. Tristram, A. J. Banday, K. M. Górski, et al.Physical Review D 105 (8) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.083524
Dynamical system analysis for accelerating models in non-metricity f(Q) gravity
S.A. Narawade, Laxmipriya Pati, B. Mishra and S.K. TripathyPhysics of the Dark Universe 36 101020 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2022.101020
Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies
Elcio Abdalla, Guillermo Franco Abellán, Amin Aboubrahim, et al.Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 34 49 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002
Full-sky, Arcminute-scale, 3D Models of Galactic Microwave Foreground Dust Emission Based on Filaments
Carlos Hervías-Caimapo and Kevin M. HuffenbergerThe Astrophysical Journal 928 (1) 65 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac54b2
Does cold inflation with dissipation mechanism in nonequilibrium thermodynamic prescription imply warm inflation?
Subenoy Chakraborty, Dipanjana Das and Sourav DuttaInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 30 (09) 2150066 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271821500668
Dark matter properties through cosmic history
Stéphane Ilić, Michael Kopp, Constantinos Skordis and Daniel B. ThomasPhysical Review D 104 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043520
Dynamical dark energy after Planck CMB final release and H0 tension
Weiqiang Yang, Eleonora Di Valentino, Supriya Pan, Yabo Wu and Jianbo LuMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (4) 5845 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3914
Constraints on ΛCDM extensions from the SPT-3G 2018 EE and TE power spectra
L. Balkenhol, D. Dutcher, P. A. R. Ade, et al.Physical Review D 104 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083509
Brane inflation and the robustness of the Starobinsky inflationary model
S. Santos da Costa, M. Benetti, R. M. P. Neves, et al.The European Physical Journal Plus 136 (1) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-01015-1
Bumblebee field as a source of cosmological anisotropies
R.V. Maluf and Juliano C.S. NevesJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (10) 038 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/038
Cosmology with the Planck T−E correlation coefficient
A. La Posta, T. Louis, X. Garrido, M. Tristram and S. Henrot-VersilléPhysical Review D 104 (2) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.023527
Decoupling redshift: The key to conciliate global and local estimates of the Universe expansion rate
Edésio M. Barboza, Everton M. C. Abreu and Jorge Ananias NetoEurophysics Letters 133 (6) 69002 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/133/69002
Lensed CMB power spectrum biases from masking extragalactic sources
Giulio Fabbian, Julien Carron, Antony Lewis and Margherita LemboPhysical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043535
Detection of spectral variations of Anomalous Microwave Emission with QUIJOTE and C-BASS
R Cepeda-Arroita, S E Harper, C Dickinson, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (2) 2927 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab583
Explaining cosmological anisotropy: evidence for causal horizons from CMB data
Pablo Fosalba and Enrique GaztañagaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (4) 5840 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1193
High H 0 Values from CMB E-mode Data: A Clue for Resolving the Hubble Tension?
Graeme E. AddisonThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 912 (1) L1 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abf56e
Lack-of-correlation anomaly in CMB large scale polarisation maps
C. Chiocchetta, A. Gruppuso, M. Lattanzi, P. Natoli and L. PaganoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (08) 015 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/015
Self-interacting neutrinos, the Hubble parameter tension, and the cosmic microwave background
Thejs Brinckmann, Jae Hyeok Chang and Marilena LoVerdePhysical Review D 104 (6) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063523
Chain early dark energy: A Proposal for solving the Hubble tension and explaining today’s dark energy
Katherine Freese and Martin Wolfgang WinklerPhysical Review D 104 (8) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083533
H0 tension, swampland conjectures, and the epoch of fading dark matter
Prateek Agrawal, Georges Obied and Cumrun VafaPhysical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043523
Positivity bounds on dark energy: when matter matters
Claudia de Rham, Scott Melville and Johannes NollerJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (08) 018 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/018
A Bayesian interpretation of inconsistency measures in cosmology
Weikang Lin and Mustapha IshakJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (05) 009 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/05/009
Bayesian estimation of our local motion from the Planck-2018 CMB temperature map
Sayan Saha, Shabbir Shaikh, Suvodip Mukherjee, Tarun Souradeep and Benjamin D. WandeltJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (10) 072 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/072
Cosmic String Interpretation of NANOGrav Pulsar Timing Data
John Ellis and Marek LewickiPhysical Review Letters 126 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041304
Joint constraints on thermal relic dark matter from strong gravitational lensing, the Ly α forest, and Milky Way satellites
Wolfgang Enzi, Riccardo Murgia, Oliver Newton, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506 (4) 5848 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1960
Dark sector interactions and the curvature of the universe in light of Planck's 2018 data
M. Benetti, H.A. Borges, C. Pigozzo, S. Carneiro and J.S. AlcanizJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (08) 014 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/08/014
Cosmological Distance Scale. Part 12. Confluent Analysis, Rank Inversion, and Lack-of-Fit Tests
S. F. LevinMeasurement Techniques 63 (12) 940 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-021-01876-7
Testing the analytical blind separation method in simulated CMB polarization maps
Larissa Santos, Jian Yao, Le Zhang, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 650 A65 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936546
Constraining the spectrum of cosmological perturbations from statistical thermal fluctuations
L.L. GraefPhysics Letters B 819 136418 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136418
Signatures of f(Q) gravity in cosmology
Noemi FrusciantePhysical Review D 103 (4) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044021
Redshift-space distortions with split densities
Enrique Paillas, Yan-Chuan Cai, Nelson Padilla and Ariel G SánchezMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 505 (4) 5731 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1654
Constraining cosmology using galaxy position angle-only cosmic shear
Lee WhittakerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (1) 728 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3959
Small-scale CMB anisotropies induced by the primordial magnetic fields
Teppei Minoda, Kiyotomo Ichiki and Hiroyuki TashiroJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (03) 093 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/03/093
A Forecast of the Sensitivity on the Measurement of the Optical Depth to Reionization with the GroundBIRD Experiment
K. Lee, R. T. Génova-Santos, M. Hazumi, S. Honda, H. Kutsuma, S. Oguri, C. Otani, M. W. Peel, Y. Sueno, J. Suzuki, O. Tajima and E. WonThe Astrophysical Journal 915 (2) 88 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac024b
Planck constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio
M. Tristram, A. J. Banday, K. M. Górski, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 647 A128 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039585
Observational constraints on α-attractor inflationary models with a Higgs-like potential
J.G. Rodrigues, S. Santos da Costa and J.S. AlcanizPhysics Letters B 815 136156 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136156
Resolving Hubble tension with quintom dark energy model *
Sirachak Panpanich, Piyabut Burikham, Supakchai Ponglertsakul and Lunchakorn TannukijChinese Physics C 45 (1) 015108 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abc537
Early Universe Physics Insensitive and Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards: Constraints on Ωm and Implications for the Hubble Tension
Weikang Lin, Xingang Chen and Katherine J. MackThe Astrophysical Journal 920 (2) 159 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac12cf
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A10 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833887
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A4 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833881
Planck2018 results
Y. Akrami, F. Argüeso, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A2 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833293
Constraints on Cosmological Parameters from the 500 deg2 SPTPOL Lensing Power Spectrum
F. Bianchini, W. L. K. Wu, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, J. E. Austermann, J. S. Avva, J. A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, E. M. George, A. Gilbert, N. Gupta, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 888 (2) 119 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6082
Detection of Missing Baryons in Galaxy Groups with Kinetic Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Effect
S. H. Lim, H. J. Mo, Huiyuan Wang and Xiaohu YangThe Astrophysical Journal 889 (1) 48 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab63df
Chemical anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation
W. T. ChylaAstronomische Nachrichten 341 (3) 331 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.202023638
Absolute calibration of the polarisation angle for future CMB B-mode experiments from current and future measurements of the Crab nebula
J. Aumont, J. F. Macías-Pérez, A. Ritacco, N. Ponthieu and A. MangilliAstronomy & Astrophysics 634 A100 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833504
Constraints on the Velocity Dispersion of Dark Matter from Cosmology and New Bounds on Scattering from the Cosmic Dawn
Iván Rodríguez-Montoya, Vladimir Avila-Reese, Abdel Pérez-Lorenzana and Jorge VenzorThe Astrophysical Journal 894 (1) 40 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab67d0
Weigh Them All!
Sunny VagnozziSpringer Theses, Weigh Them All! 5 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53502-5_2
Reionization inference from the CMB optical depth and E-mode polarization power spectra
Yuxiang Qin, Vivian Poulin, Andrei Mesinger, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499 (1) 550 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2797
Updating constraints on f(T) teleparallel cosmology and the consistency with big bang nucleosynthesis
Micol Benetti, Salvatore Capozziello and Gaetano LambiaseMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (2) 1795 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3368
Radiative stability and observational constraints on dark energy and modified gravity
J. Noller and A. NicolaPhysical Review D 102 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.104045
Beyond Optical Depth: Future Determination of Ionization History from the Cosmic Microwave Background
D. J. Watts, G. E. Addison, C. L. Bennett and J. L. WeilandThe Astrophysical Journal 889 (2) 130 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fd5
Accelerated Bayesian inference using deep learning
Adam MossMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (1) 328 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1469
Hubble constant hunter’s guide
L. Knox and M. MilleaPhysical Review D 101 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043533
Design and Performance of the First BICEP Array Receiver
A. Schillaci, P. A. R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, et al.Journal of Low Temperature Physics 199 (3-4) 976 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-020-02394-6
Impact of 1/f noise on cosmological parameter constraints for SKA intensity mapping
T Chen, R A Battye, A A Costa, C Dickinson and S E HarperMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (3) 4254 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3307
How sound are our ultralight axion approximations?
Jonathan Cookmeyer, Daniel Grin and Tristan L. SmithPhysical Review D 101 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.023501
Inflation model selection revisited after a 1.91% measurement of the Hubble constant
Rui-Yun Guo, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63 (9) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-1514-0
Anomalous spectral lines and relic quantum nonequilibrium
Nicolas G. Underwood and Antony ValentiniPhysical Review D 101 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043004
Joining Bits and Pieces of Reionization History
Dhiraj Kumar Hazra, Daniela Paoletti, Fabio Finelli and George F. SmootPhysical Review Letters 125 (7) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.071301
The look-elsewhere effect from a unified Bayesian and frequentist perspective
Adrian E. Bayer and Uroš SeljakJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 009 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/009
Planck 2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A5 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936386
Is it mixed dark matter or neutrino masses?
Julia Stadler, Céline Bœhm and Olga MenaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (01) 039 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/039
Predictions of Cosmic Microwave Background Foreground Dust Polarization Using Velocity Gradients
Yue Hu, Ka Ho Yuen and A. LazarianThe Astrophysical Journal 888 (2) 96 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab60a5
Updated fundamental constant constraints from Planck 2018 data and possible relations to the Hubble tension
Jens Chluba and Luke HartMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (3) 3255 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa412
Planck 2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A3 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832909
Thermal history of composite dark matter
Nicola Andrea Dondi, Francesco Sannino and Juri SmirnovPhysical Review D 101 (10) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.103010
Forecast for weighing neutrinos in cosmology with SKA
Jing-Fei Zhang, Bo Wang and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-1516-y
Improved model-independent constraints on the recombination era and development of a direct projection method
Jens Chluba and Luke HartMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 495 (4) 4210 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1426
CMB and BBN constraints on evaporating primordial black holes revisited
Sandeep Kumar Acharya and Rishi KhatriJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (06) 018 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/018
Exploring neutrino mass and mass hierarchy in interacting dark energy models
Lu Feng, Hai-Li Li, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-9431-9
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833886
A novel CMB component separation method: hierarchical generalized morphological component analysis
Sebastian Wagner-Carena, Max Hopkins, Ana Diaz Rivero and Cora DvorkinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (1) 1507 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa744
Constraints on decaying dark matter from weak lensing and cluster counts
Kari Enqvist, Seshadri Nadathur, Toyokazu Sekiguchi and Tomo TakahashiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (04) 015 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/015
Lensinglike tensions in the Planck legacy release
Pavel Motloch and Wayne HuPhysical Review D 101 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083515
How much primordial tensor mode is allowed?
Moumita Aich, Yin-Zhe Ma, Wei-Ming Dai and Jun-Qing XiaPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063536
Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: A resolution with novel signatures
Tristan L. Smith, Vivian Poulin and Mustafa A. AminPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063523
Planck2018 results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 A1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833880
The change of the Universe epochs within the scope of Bianchi type-V model
Ruslan K. Muharlyamov and Tatiana N. PankratyevaIndian Journal of Physics 94 (8) 1293 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-019-01559-8
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
Simone Aiola, Erminia Calabrese, Loïc Maurin, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (12) 047 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/047
Reionization optical depth determination from Planck HFI data with ten percent accuracy
L. Pagano, J.-M. Delouis, S. Mottet, J.-L. Puget and L. VibertAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 A99 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936630
Likelihood Methods for CMB Experiments
Martina Gerbino, Massimiliano Lattanzi, Marina Migliaccio, et al.Frontiers in Physics 8 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00015
Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance
J. Colin Hill, Evan McDonough, Michael W. Toomey and Stephon AlexanderPhysical Review D 102 (4) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.043507
Parameter estimation in cosmic string spacetime by using the inertial and accelerated detectors
Ying Yang, Jieci Wang, Mengjie Wang, Jiliang Jing and Zehua TianClassical and Quantum Gravity 37 (6) 065017 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab6f73
Measuring the integrated Sachs–Wolfe effect from the low-density regions of the universe
Fuyu Dong, Yu Yu, Jun Zhang, Xiaohu Yang and Pengjie ZhangMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 500 (3) 3838 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3194
Reconstructing gravity on cosmological scales
Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 101 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083524
Forecasting interacting vacuum-energy models using gravitational waves
Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, Eleonora Di Valentino, Bin Wang and Anzhong WangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (05) 050 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/050
Hybrid-basis inference for large-scale galaxy clustering: combining spherical and Cartesian Fourier analyses
M.S. Wang, S. Avila, D. Bianchi, R. Crittenden and W.J. PercivalJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (10) 022 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/10/022
Gaussian processes reconstruction of modified gravitational wave propagation
Enis Belgacem, Stefano Foffa, Michele Maggiore and Tao YangPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063505
Theoretical priors in scalar-tensor cosmologies: Thawing quintessence
Carlos García-García, Emilio Bellini, Pedro G. Ferreira, Dina Traykova and Miguel ZumalacárreguiPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063508
Cosmological constraints on dark energy in light of gravitational wave bounds
Johannes NollerPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063524
The BAHAMAS project: effects of dynamical dark energy on large-scale structure
Simon Pfeifer, Ian G McCarthy, Sam G Stafford, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (2) 1576 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2240
Positivity in the Sky: Constraining dark energy and modified gravity from the UV
S. Melville and J. NollerPhysical Review D 101 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.021502
Testing H0 in acoustic dark energy models with Planck and ACT polarization data
Meng-Xiang Lin, Wayne Hu and Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123523
Alleviating the H0 and σ8 anomalies with a decaying dark matter model
Kanhaiya L. Pandey, Tanvi Karwal and Subinoy DasJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (07) 026 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/026
Can dark neutrino interactions phase out the Hubble tension?
Subhajit Ghosh, Rishi Khatri and Tuhin S. RoyPhysical Review D 102 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123544