Planck 2015 results - XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity
A&A, 594 (2016) A14
Published online: 2016-09-20
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Acoustic dark energy: Potential conversion of the Hubble tension
Meng-Xiang Lin, Giampaolo Benevento, Wayne Hu and Marco RaveriPhysical Review D 100 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.063542
Probing the independence within the dark sector in the fluid approximation
Lawrence Dam, Krzysztof Bolejko and Geraint F. LewisJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (12) 030 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/030
Constraints on massive vector dark energy models from integrated Sachs-Wolfe-galaxy cross-correlations
Shintaro Nakamura, Antonio De Felice, Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 99 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063533
Testing modified gravity at cosmological distances with LISA standard sirens
Enis Belgacem, Gianluca Calcagni, Marco Crisostomi, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (07) 024 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/024
Redshift space distortions in the presence of non-minimally coupled dark matter
F. Chibana, R. Kimura, M. Yamaguchi, D. Yamauchi and S. YokoyamaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10) 049 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/049
Models of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter: Constraints and comparison
Hai-Li Li, Lu Feng, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 62 (12) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-9439-8
Classical and quantum fate of the little sibling of the big rip in f(R) cosmology
Teodor Borislavov Vasilev, Mariam Bouhmadi-López and Prado Martín-MorunoPhysical Review D 100 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.084016
Standard sirens with a running Planck mass
Macarena Lagos, Maya Fishbach, Philippe Landry and Daniel E. HolzPhysical Review D 99 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083504
Revisit of constraints on dark energy with Hubble parameter measurements including future redshift drift observations
Yan Liu, Rui-Yun Guo, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 016 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/016
Phenomenology of modified gravity at recombination
Meng-Xiang Lin, Marco Raveri and Wayne HuPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043514
Friedmann–Robertson–Walker (FRW) cosmological model in the present perspective
G.K. GoswamiCanadian Journal of Physics 97 (6) 588 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjp-2018-0339
Tracker and scaling solutions in DHOST theories
Noemi Frusciante, Ryotaro Kase, Kazuya Koyama, Shinji Tsujikawa and Daniele VernieriPhysics Letters B 790 167 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.01.009
Anisotropic 2-form dark energy
Juan P. Beltrán Almeida, Alejandro Guarnizo, Ryotaro Kase, Shinji Tsujikawa and César A. Valenzuela-ToledoPhysics Letters B 793 396 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.008
Warm Little Inflaton becomes dark energy
João G. Rosa and Luís B. VenturaPhysics Letters B 798 134984 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134984
Cosmological constraints of phantom dark energy models
Amine Bouali, Imanol Albarran, Mariam Bouhmadi-López and Taoufik OualiPhysics of the Dark Universe 26 100391 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2019.100391
Holographic Dark Energy Model is Consistent with Pantheon SN Ia Data*
Xin 昕 Li 李, Su-Ping 素平 Zhao 赵, Li 丽 Tang 唐 and Hai-Nan 海南 Lin 林Communications in Theoretical Physics 71 (4) 421 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/4/421
Fine-structure constant constraints on late-time dark energy transitions
C.J.A.P. Martins and M. Prat ColomerPhysics Letters B 791 230 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.02.039
Searching for dark matter-dark energy interactions: Going beyond the conformal case
Carsten van de Bruck and Jurgen MifsudPhysical Review D 97 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023506
Quantum Theory and Symmetries with Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics Volume 2
Kalin Marinov and Plamen FizievSpringer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, Quantum Theory and Symmetries with Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics Volume 2 255 261 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2179-5_20
Probing the sign-changeable interaction between dark energy and dark matter with current observations
Juan-Juan Guo, Jing-Fei Zhang, Yun-He Li, Dong-Ze He and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 61 (3) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-017-9131-9
The integrated Sachs–Wolfe effect in the bulk viscous dark energy model
B Mostaghel, H Moshafi and S M S MovahedMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2) 1799 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2384
The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: constraining modified gravity
Eva-Maria Mueller, Will Percival, Eric Linder, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (2) 2122 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3232
Covariant formulation of scalar-torsion gravity
Manuel Hohmann, Laur Järv and Ulbossyn UalikhanovaPhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104011
Testing (modified) gravity with 3D and tomographic cosmic shear
A Spurio Mancini, R Reischke, V Pettorino, B M Schäfer and M ZumalacárreguiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (3) 3725 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2092
Strong Lensing Modeling in Galaxy Clusters as a Promising Method to Test Cosmography. I. Parametric Dark Energy Models
Juan Magaña, Ana Acebrón, Verónica Motta, Tomás Verdugo, Eric Jullo and Marceau LimousinThe Astrophysical Journal 865 (2) 122 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aada7d
New scaling solutions in cubic Horndeski theories
Inês S. Albuquerque, Noemi Frusciante, Nelson J. Nunes and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.064038
The two-component virial theorem and the acceleration–discrepancy relation
Christine C. Dantas, André L. B. Ribeiro and Hugo V. CapelatoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (1) 618 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2785
Planck intermediate results
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 617 A48 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731489
Probing the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy beyond ΛCDM Model
En-Kun Li, Hongchao Zhang, Minghui Du, Zhi-Huan Zhou and Lixin XuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (08) 042 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/042
Constraining late-time transitions in the dark energy equation of state
C. J. A. P. Martins and M. Prat ColomerAstronomy & Astrophysics 616 A32 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833313
Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics?
Edvard Mörtsell and Suhail DhawanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (09) 025 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/025
Deforming black hole and cosmological solutions by quasiperiodic and/or pattern forming structures in modified and Einstein gravity
Laurenţiu Bubuianu and Sergiu I. VacaruThe European Physical Journal C 78 (5) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5853-6
Do cosmological data rule out f(R) with w≠−1 ?
Richard A. Battye, Boris Bolliet and Francesco PacePhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104070
Einstein gravity with torsion induced by the scalar field
H.T. Özçelik, R. Kaya and M. HortaçsuAnnals of Physics 393 132 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.04.012
A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: Negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework
J. S. FarnesAstronomy & Astrophysics 620 A92 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832898
Brane with variable tension as a possible solution to the problem of the late cosmic acceleration
Miguel A. García-Aspeitia, A. Hernandez-Almada, Juan Magaña, et al.Physical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.101301
Updated tomographic analysis of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect and implications for dark energy
Benjamin Stölzner, Alessandro Cuoco, Julien Lesgourgues and Maciej BilickiPhysical Review D 97 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.063506
Kantowski-Sachs Einstein-aether scalar field cosmological models
R.J. van den Hoogen, A.A. Coley, B. Alhulaimi, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (11) 017 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/017
Imprint of thawing scalar fields on the large scale galaxy overdensity
Bikash R. Dinda and Anjan A. SenPhysical Review D 97 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.083506
Breaking degeneracies in modified gravity with higher (than 2nd) order weak-lensing statistics
Austin Peel, Valeria Pettorino, Carlo Giocoli, Jean-Luc Starck and Marco BaldiAstronomy & Astrophysics 619 A38 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833481
Theoretical and Observational Constraints of Bound Dark Energy with Precision Cosmological Data
Axel de la Macorra and Erick AlmarazPhysical Review Letters 121 (16) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161303
Constraints on γ-CDM interactions matching the Planck data precision
Julia Stadler and Céline BœhmJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (10) 009 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/009
Emulating aΛCDM-like expansion on the phantom brane
Satadru Bag, Swagat S. Mishra and Varun SahniPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123537
Lensing convergence in galaxy clustering in ΛCDM and beyond
Eleonora Villa, Enea Di Dio and Francesca LeporiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (04) 033 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/033
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data
T M C Abbott, F B Abdalla, J Annis, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (3) 3879 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1939
Bayesian evidences for dark energy models in light of current observational data
Anto. I. Lonappan, Sumit Kumar, Ruchika, Bikash R. Dinda and Anjan A. SenPhysical Review D 97 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043524
Finding structure in the dark: Coupled dark energy, weak lensing, and the mildly nonlinear regime
Vinicius Miranda, Mariana Carrillo González, Elisabeth Krause and Mark TroddenPhysical Review D 97 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.063511
Comparison of Einstein-Boltzmann solvers for testing general relativity
E. Bellini, A. Barreira, N. Frusciante, et al.Physical Review D 97 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.023520
Searching for sterile neutrinos in dynamical dark energy cosmologies
Lu Feng, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 61 (5) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-017-9150-3
Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
Luca Amendola, Stephen Appleby, Anastasios Avgoustidis, et al.Living Reviews in Relativity 21 (1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-017-0010-3
Dark Energy in Light of Multi-Messenger Gravitational-Wave Astronomy
Jose María Ezquiaga and Miguel ZumalacárreguiFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 5 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2018.00044
Dark energy reconstruction based on the Padé approximation; an expansion around the $$\varLambda $$ Λ CDM
Ahmad mehrabi and Spyros BasilakosThe European Physical Journal C 78 (11) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6368-x
Anisotropic Cosmological Models with Two Fluids
B. Mishra, Pratik P. Ray and S. K. J. PacifAdvances in High Energy Physics 2018 1 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6306848
Reconstructing Horndeski theories from phenomenological modified gravity and dark energy models on cosmological scales
Joe Kennedy, Lucas Lombriser and Andy TaylorPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044051
Deconstructing the neutrino mass constraint from galaxy redshift surveys
Aoife Boyle and Eiichiro KomatsuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (03) 035 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/035
Testing the equivalence principle on cosmological scales
Camille Bonvin and Pierre FleuryJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (05) 061 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/05/061
Growth of perturbations in dark energy parametrization scenarios
Ahmad MehrabiPhysical Review D 97 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.083522
Direct detection of gravitational waves can measure the time variation of the Planck mass
Luca Amendola, Ignacy Sawicki, Martin Kunz and Ippocratis D. SaltasJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (08) 030 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/030
Cosmic degeneracies III: N-body simulations of interacting dark energy with non-Gaussian initial conditions
M Hashim, C Giocoli, M Baldi, D Bertacca and R MaartensMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (3) 2933 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2450
New tracker models of dark energy
Satadru Bag, Swagat S. Mishra and Varun SahniJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (08) 009 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/009
Nonlinear effective theory of dark energy
Giulia Cusin, Matthew Lewandowski and Filippo VernizziJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (04) 061 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/061
Non-AbelianS-term dark energy and inflation
Yeinzon Rodríguez and Andrés A. NavarroPhysics of the Dark Universe 19 129 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.01.003
Spacetime singularities in generalized Brans-Dicke theories
G. Brando, F. T. Falciano and L. F. GuimarãesPhysical Review D 98 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044027
Planck intermediate results
Y. Akrami, F. Argüeso, M. Ashdown, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 619 A94 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832888
Large-scale structure phenomenology of viable Horndeski theories
Simone Peirone, Kazuya Koyama, Levon Pogosian, Marco Raveri and Alessandra SilvestriPhysical Review D 97 (4) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.043519
Dependence of Type Ia supernova luminosities on their local environment
M. Roman, D. Hardin, M. Betoule, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 615 A68 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731425
General modified gravity with 21cm intensity mapping: simulations and forecast
C. Heneka and L. AmendolaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (10) 004 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/004
Dark energy in scalar-vector-tensor theories
Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (11) 024 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/11/024
The Avoidance of the Little Sibling of the Big Rip Abrupt Event by a Quantum Approach
Imanol Albarran, Mariam Bouhmadi-López, Franciso Cabral and Prado Martín-MorunoGalaxies 6 (1) 21 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6010021
Cosmological perturbation and matter power spectrum in bimetric massive gravity
Chao-Qiang Geng, Chung-Chi Lee and Kaituo ZhangAnnals of Physics 391 16 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.02.001
Simulations of the WFIRST Supernova Survey and Forecasts of Cosmological Constraints
R. Hounsell, D. Scolnic, R. J. Foley, R. Kessler, V. Miranda, A. Avelino, R. C. Bohlin, A. V. Filippenko, J. Frieman, S. W. Jha, P. L. Kelly, R. P. Kirshner, K. Mandel, A. Rest, A. G. Riess, S. A. Rodney and L. StrolgerThe Astrophysical Journal 867 (1) 23 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac08b
Gravity beyond general relativity
Kazuya KoyamaInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 27 (15) 1848001 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818480012
Neutrino masses and beyond- ΛCDM cosmology with LSST and future CMB experiments
Siddharth Mishra-Sharma, David Alonso and Joanna DunkleyPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.123544
Statistical Test of Distance–Duality Relation with Type Ia Supernovae and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
Cong Ma and Pier-Stefano CorasanitiThe Astrophysical Journal 861 (2) 124 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aac88f
The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample
D. M. Scolnic, D. O. Jones, A. Rest, Y. C. Pan, R. Chornock, R. J. Foley, M. E. Huber, R. Kessler, G. Narayan, A. G. Riess, S. Rodney, E. Berger, D. J. Brout, P. J. Challis, M. Drout, D. Finkbeiner, R. Lunnan, R. P. Kirshner, N. E. Sanders, E. Schlafly, S. Smartt, C. W. Stubbs, J. Tonry, W. M. Wood-Vasey, M. Foley, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 859 (2) 101 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb
Inhomogeneous perturbations in the pseudo-Hermitian quantum cosmology
Oleg Novikov, V.E. Volkova, Y.V. Zhezher, et al.EPJ Web of Conferences 191 07005 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201819107005
Born–Infeld inspired modifications of gravity
Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Lavinia Heisenberg, Gonzalo J. Olmo and Diego Rubiera-GarciaPhysics Reports 727 1 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.001
Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Cosmological parameters
E. Di Valentino, T. Brinckmann, M. Gerbino, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (04) 017 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/017
Scalar-torsion theories of gravity. II. L(T, X, Y, ϕ) theory
Manuel Hohmann and Christian PfeiferPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.064003
Exploring neutrino mass and mass hierarchy in the scenario of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter
Rui-Yun Guo, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangChinese Physics C 42 (9) 095103 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/42/9/095103
The impact of baryons on the sensitivity of dark energy measurements
David Copeland, Andy Taylor and Alex HallMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (2) 2247 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2001
Toward a Measurement of the Transverse Peculiar Velocity of Galaxy Pairs
Alexandra E. Truebenbach and Jeremy DarlingThe Astrophysical Journal 868 (1) 69 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae830
Assessing Consistency between WMAP 9 Year and Planck 2015 Temperature Power Spectra
Y. Huang, G. E. Addison, J. L. Weiland and C. L. BennettThe Astrophysical Journal 869 (1) 38 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaeb1f
Forecast and analysis of the cosmological redshift drift
Ruth Lazkoz, Iker Leanizbarrutia and Vincenzo SalzanoThe European Physical Journal C 78 (1) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5479-0
Future Cosmological Constraints From Fast Radio Bursts
Anthony Walters, Amanda Weltman, B. M. Gaensler, Yin-Zhe Ma and Amadeus WitzemannThe Astrophysical Journal 856 (1) 65 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf6b
Comparing dark energy models with current observational data
Sixiang Wen, Shuang Wang and Xiaolin LuoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (07) 011 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/011
New general parametrization of quintessence fields and its observational constraints
Nandan Roy, Alma X. Gonzalez-Morales and L. Arturo Ureña-LópezPhysical Review D 98 (6) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063530
Odd-parity stability of hairy black holes in U(1) gauge-invariant scalar-vector-tensor theories
Lavinia Heisenberg, Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 97 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.124043
Dark energy scenario consistent with GW170817 in theories beyond Horndeski gravity
Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103501
Polynomial f(R) Palatini cosmology: Dynamical system approach
Marek Szydłowski and Aleksander StachowskiPhysical Review D 97 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103524
Possible signals of vacuum dynamics in the Universe
Joan Solà Peracaula, Javier de Cruz Pérez and Adrià Gómez-ValentMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (4) 4357 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1253
Exploring the Tension between Current Cosmic Microwave Background and Cosmic Shear Data
Eleonora Di Valentino and Sarah BridleSymmetry 10 (11) 585 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110585
Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: Dark energy and modified gravity
Sebastian Bahamonde, Christian G. Böhmer, Sante Carloni, Edmund J. Copeland, Wei Fang and Nicola TamaniniPhysics Reports 775-777 1 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.09.001
KiDS-450 + 2dFLenS: Cosmological parameter constraints from weak gravitational lensing tomography and overlapping redshift-space galaxy clustering
Shahab Joudaki, Chris Blake, Andrew Johnson, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (4) 4894 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2820
Dark energy two decades after: observables, probes, consistency tests
Dragan Huterer and Daniel L ShaferReports on Progress in Physics 81 (1) 016901 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa997e
Cosmological constraints on Horndeski gravity in light of GW170817
C.D. Kreisch and E. KomatsuJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (12) 030 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/12/030
Most general cubic-order Horndeski Lagrangian allowing for scaling solutions and the application to dark energy
Noemi Frusciante, Ryotaro Kase, Nelson J. Nunes and Shinji TsujikawaPhysical Review D 98 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.123517
The H0 Tension in Non-flat QCDM Cosmology
Haitao Miao and Zhiqi HuangThe Astrophysical Journal 868 (1) 20 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae523
Exploring interacting holographic dark energy in a perturbed universe with parameterized post-Friedmann approach
Lu Feng, Yun-He Li, Fei Yu, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangThe European Physical Journal C 78 (10) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6338-3
Internal robustness of growth rate data
Bryan Sagredo, Savvas Nesseris and Domenico SaponePhysical Review D 98 (8) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083543