Planck 2015 results - XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity
A&A, 594 (2016) A14
Published online: 2016-09-20
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Statistical separation of weak gravitational lensing and intrinsic ellipticities based on galaxy colour information
Björn Malte Schäfer, Robert Reischke and Tim M TugendhatMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (2) 2969 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa641
Twinlike models for parametrized dark energy
J. D. Dantas and J. J. RodriguesThe European Physical Journal C 80 (7) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8233-y
Arbitrarily coupled p -forms in cosmological backgrounds
Juan P Beltrán Almeida, Alejandro Guarnizo and César A Valenzuela-ToledoClassical and Quantum Gravity 37 (3) 035001 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab5f3c
J-PAS: forecasts on dark energy and modified gravity theories
H Vázquez Ramió, J Varela, K Taylor, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (3) 3616 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa367
Does $$\varLambda $$CDM really be in tension with the Hubble diagram data?
Ahmad Mehrabi and Spyros BasilakosThe European Physical Journal C 80 (7) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8221-2
A Bayesian comparison between $$\Lambda $$CDM and phenomenologically emergent dark energy models
M. Rezaei, T. Naderi, M. Malekjani and A. MehrabiThe European Physical Journal C 80 (5) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7942-6
Euclid preparation
A. Blanchard, S. Camera, C. Carbone, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 642 A191 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038071
A null test to probe the scale dependence of the growth of structure as a test of general relativity
Felipe Oliveira Franco, Camille Bonvin and Chris ClarksonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 492 (1) L34 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slz175
Model independent perspectives on coupled dark energy and the swampland
Tao YangPhysical Review D 102 (8) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.083511
Quintessence and tachyon dark energy in interaction with dark matter: Observational constraints and model selection
Sandro M. R. MichelettiInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 29 (08) 2050057 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271820500571
Effective field theory of dark energy: A review
Noemi Frusciante and Louis PerenonPhysics Reports 857 1 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.02.004
Dynamical aspects for scalar fields coupled to cubic contractions of the Riemann tensor
Mihai MarciuPhysical Review D 102 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023517
Beyond self-acceleration: Force- and fluid-acceleration
Luca Amendola and Valeria PettorinoPhysics Letters B 802 135214 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135214
The role of CMB spectral distortions in the Hubble tension: A proof of principle
Matteo LuccaPhysics Letters B 810 135791 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135791
Weigh Them All!
Sunny VagnozziSpringer Theses, Weigh Them All! 5 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53502-5_2
Imprint of a Steep Equation of State in the growth of structure
Mariana Jaber-Bravo, Erick Almaraz and Axel de la MacorraAstroparticle Physics 115 102388 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.102388
Cosmological constraints on dark energy in light of gravitational wave bounds
Johannes NollerPhysical Review D 101 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063524
Testing deviations from GR at cosmological scales including dynamical dark energy, massive neutrinos, functional or binned parametrizations, and spatial curvature
Cristhian Garcia-Quintero, Mustapha Ishak, Logan Fox and Jason DossettPhysical Review D 100 (10) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103530
Neutrino mass and dark energy constraints from redshift-space distortions
Amol UpadhyeJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 041 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/041
CMB Tensions with Low-Redshift H0 and S8 Measurements: Impact of a Redshift-Dependent Type-Ia Supernovae Intrinsic Luminosity
Matteo Martinelli and Isaac TutusausSymmetry 11 (8) 986 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11080986
Optimising growth of structure constraints on modified gravity
Louis Perenon, Julien Bel, Roy Maartens and Alvaro de la Cruz-DombrizJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (06) 020 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/06/020
Coupled vector dark energy
Shintaro Nakamura, Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (12) 032 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/032
Arbitrariness of potentials in interacting quintessence models
Nandan Roy and Kazuharu BambaPhysical Review D 99 (12) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123520
Observational status of the Galileon model general solution from cosmological data and gravitational waves
C. Leloup, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, J. Neveu and A. de MattiaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 011 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/011
Spherical collapse model in varying G$G$ cosmologies
M. Taji and M. MalekjaniAstrophysics and Space Science 364 (7) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-019-3613-1
Bounding f(R,T) gravity by particle creation
K. Asadiyan, F. Darabi, P. Pedram and K. AtazadehInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 16 (10) 1950153 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887819501536
Reconstruction of the Dark Energy equation of state from latest data: the impact of theoretical priors
Francesca Gerardi, Matteo Martinelli and Alessandra SilvestriJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (07) 042 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/042
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Mustapha IshakLiving Reviews in Relativity 22 (1) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4
Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Constraints on extended cosmological models from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Avila, et al.Physical Review D 99 (12) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123505
Observational constraints on the oscillating dark energy cosmologies
Mehdi RezaeiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (1) 550 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz394
Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review
Ryotaro Kase and Shinji TsujikawaInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 28 (05) 1942005 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819420057
Screening and degenerate kinetic self-acceleration from the nonlinear freedom of reconstructed Horndeski theories
Joe Kennedy, Lucas Lombriser and Andy TaylorPhysical Review D 100 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.044034
Connecting early and late epochs by f(z)CDM cosmography
Micol Benetti and Salvatore CapozzielloJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (12) 008 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/008
Influence of the correlation prior on reconstruction of the dark energy equation of state
Youhua Xu, Hu Zhan and Yeuk-Kwan Edna CheungJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10) 006 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/10/006
Safely smoothing spacetime: backreaction in relativistic cosmological simulations
Julian Adamek, Chris Clarkson, David Daverio, Ruth Durrer and Martin KunzClassical and Quantum Gravity 36 (1) 014001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aaeca5
Cosmological constraints on parametrized interacting dark energy
R. von Marttens, L. Casarini, D.F. Mota and W. ZimdahlPhysics of the Dark Universe 23 100248 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.10.007
Coupled quintessence with a ΛCDM background: removing the σ8 tension
Bruno J. Barros, Luca Amendola, Tiago Barreiro and Nelson J. NunesJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (01) 007 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/007
H 0 Tension and the Phantom Regime: A Case Study in Terms of an Infrared f(T) Gravity
Amr El-Zant, Waleed El Hanafy and Sherif ElgammalThe Astrophysical Journal 871 (2) 210 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aafa12
Constraints on field flows of quintessence dark energy
Federico Tosone, Balakrishna S. Haridasu, Vladimir V. Luković and Nicola VittorioPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043503
Model-independent constraints on dark energy evolution from low-redshift observations
Salvatore Capozziello, Ruchika and Anjan A SenMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (4) 4484 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz176
Cosmologically viable generalized Einstein-aether theories
Richard A. Battye, Boris Bolliet, Francesco Pace and Damien TrinhPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043515
Distinguishing standard and modified gravity cosmologies with machine learning
Austin Peel, Florian Lalande, Jean-Luc Starck, et al.Physical Review D 100 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023508
Unified early and late Universe cosmology through dissipative effects in steep quintessential inflation potential models
Gustavo B. F. Lima and Rudnei O. RamosPhysical Review D 100 (12) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123529
Extended ΛCDM model and viscous dark energy: a Bayesian analysis
W.J.C. da Silva and R. SilvaJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 036 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/036
Cosmological constraints from the Hubble diagram of quasars at high redshifts
G. Risaliti and E. LussoNature Astronomy 3 (3) 272 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0657-z
Bayesian comparison of interacting scenarios
Antonella Cid, Beethoven Santos, Cassio Pigozzo, Tassia Ferreira and Jailson AlcanizJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (03) 030 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/03/030
Splashback radius in symmetron gravity
Omar Contigiani, Valeri Vardanyan and Alessandra SilvestriPhysical Review D 99 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.064030
Testing gravity on cosmological scales with cosmic shear, cosmic microwave background anisotropies, and redshift-space distortions
Agnès Ferté, Donnacha Kirk, Andrew R. Liddle and Joe ZuntzPhysical Review D 99 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083512
What laboratory experiments can teach us about cosmology: A chameleon example
Clare Burrage, T. Jenke, S. Degenkolb, et al.EPJ Web of Conferences 219 05001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921905001
From Quantum Mechanics to running Λ cosmologies
A. Stachowski, M. Szydłowski and K. UrbanowskiJournal of Physics: Conference Series 1275 (1) 012040 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1275/1/012040
An Exponential Shape Function for Wormholes in Modified Gravity*
P. H. R. S. Moraes, Pradyumn Kumar Sahoo, Shreyas Sunil Kulkarni and Shivaank AgarwalChinese Physics Letters 36 (12) 120401 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/36/12/120401
Distance priors from Planck final release
Lu Chen, Qing-Guo Huang and Ke WangJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (02) 028 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/028
Cosmological Tests of Gravity with the Latest Observations
Jian Li and Gong-Bo ZhaoThe Astrophysical Journal 871 (2) 196 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf869
Modified Gravity at Astrophysical Scales
M. Cermeño, J. Carro, A. L. Maroto and M. A. Pérez-GarcíaThe Astrophysical Journal 872 (2) 130 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab001c
Probing Time-dependent Dark Energy with the Flux Power Spectrum of the Lyα Forest
Jared W. Coughlin, Grant J. Mathews, Lara Arielle Phillips, Ali P. Snedden and In-Saeng SuhThe Astrophysical Journal 874 (1) 11 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab04f9
Probing Cosmic Acceleration Using Model-independent Parameterizations and Three Kinds of Supernova Statistics Techniques
Xiaolin Luo, Shuang Wang and Sixiang WenThe Astrophysical Journal 873 (1) 47 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab0416
Can Reverberation-measured Quasars Be Used for Cosmology?
Mary Loli Martínez-Aldama, Bożena Czerny, Damian Kawka, Vladimir Karas, Swayamtrupta Panda, Michal Zajaček and Piotr T. ŻyckiThe Astrophysical Journal 883 (2) 170 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3728
Model-independent cosmic acceleration and redshift-dependent intrinsic luminosity in type-Ia supernovae
I. Tutusaus, B. Lamine and A. BlanchardAstronomy & Astrophysics 625 A15 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833032
On the road to percent accuracy: non-linear reaction of the matter power spectrum to dark energy and modified gravity
M Cataneo, L Lombriser, C Heymans, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 2121 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1836
Forecasted constraints on modified gravity from Sunyaev-Zel’dovich tomography
Zhen Pan and Matthew C. JohnsonPhysical Review D 100 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.083522
Tsallis agegraphic dark energy model
M. Abdollahi Zadeh, A. Sheykhi and H. MoradpourModern Physics Letters A 34 (11) 1950086 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S021773231950086X
KiDS + GAMA: constraints on horndeski gravity from combined large-scale structure probes
A Spurio Mancini, F Köhlinger, B Joachimi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (2) 2155 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2581
Bound dark energy: Towards understanding the nature of dark energy
Erick Almaraz and Axel de la MacorraPhysical Review D 99 (10) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103504
Consistency tests in cosmology using relative entropy
Andrina Nicola, Adam Amara and Alexandre RefregierJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (01) 011 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/01/011
Bayesian evidence for α-attractor dark energy models
Francisco X. Linares Cedeño, Ariadna Montiel, Juan Carlos Hidalgo and Gabriel GermanJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (08) 002 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/002
Structure formation in dark energy cosmologies described by PADE parametrization
Mehdi RezaeiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 485 (4) 4841 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz733
An interacting dark sector and the implications of the first gravitational-wave standard siren detection on current constraints
Jurgen Mifsud and Carsten van de BruckMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (1) 900 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1293
Calibrating long-period variables as standard candles with machine learning
Markus Michael Rau, Sergey E Koposov, Hy Trac and Rachel MandelbaumMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (1) 409 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3495
Dark sector evolution in Horndeski models
Francesco Pace, Richard A. Battye, Boris Bolliet and Damien TrinhJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (09) 018 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/09/018
Friedmann–Robertson–Walker accelerating Universe with interactive dark energy
G K Goswami, Anirudh Pradhan and A BeeshamPramana 93 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-019-1856-6
Search for sterile neutrinos in a universe of vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter
Lu Feng, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin ZhangPhysics of the Dark Universe 23 100261 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2018.100261
Can dark energy be expressed as a power series of the Hubble parameter?
Mehdi Rezaei, Mohammad Malekjani and Joan Solà PeracaulaPhysical Review D 100 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023539
Understanding the neutrino mass constraints achievable by combining CMB lensing and spectroscopic galaxy surveys
Aoife BoyleJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (04) 038 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/038
Phenomenology of minimal theory of quasidilaton massive gravity
Antonio De Felice, Shinji Mukohyama and Michele OliosiPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044055
Unraveling the effective fluid approach for f(R) models in the subhorizon approximation
Rubén Arjona, Wilmar Cardona and Savvas NesserisPhysical Review D 99 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043516
Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. III. Future prospect
Atsushi Nishizawa and Shun AraiPhysical Review D 99 (10) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.104038
Cosmological scalar fields and Big-Bang nucleosynthesis
A. Arbey and J.-F. CoupechouxJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (11) 038 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/038
Tsallis holographic dark energy in Bianchi-I Universe using hybrid expansion law with k-essence
Vipin Chandra Dubey, Shikha Srivastava, Umesh Kumar Sharma and Anirudh PradhanPramana 93 (5) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-019-1843-y
On the diversity of stationary cosmologies in the first half of the twentieth century
E.-A. Dubois and A. FüzfaGeneral Relativity and Gravitation 51 (1) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2496-8
Inflation in generalized unimodular gravity
A. O. Barvinsky and N. KolganovPhysical Review D 100 (12) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.123510
Observational constraints in nonlocal gravity: the Deser-Woodard case
Luca Amendola, Yves Dirian, Henrik Nersisyan and Sohyun ParkJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (03) 045 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/03/045
Constraints on interacting dynamical dark energy and a new test for $$\Lambda $$CDM
Marco Bonici and Nicola MaggioreThe European Physical Journal C 79 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7198-1
Interpreting deviations between AR-VTG and GR
Roberto Dale and Diego SáezInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 28 (01) 1930002 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819300027
MGCAMB with massive neutrinos and dynamical dark energy
A. Zucca, L. Pogosian, A. Silvestri and G.B. ZhaoJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 001 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/001
Observational constraints on growth index with cosmography
Zhao-Yu Yin and Hao WeiThe European Physical Journal C 79 (8) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7191-8
α-attractor dark energy in view of next-generation cosmological surveys
Carlos García-García, Pilar Ruíz-Lapuente, David Alonso and M. ZumalacárreguiJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (07) 025 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/025
Observational signatures of dark energy produced in an ancestor vacuum: forecast for galaxy surveys
Daisuke Yamauchi, Hajime Aoki, Satoshi Iso, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (05) 055 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/055
Tsallis holographic model of dark energy: Cosmic behavior, statefinder analysis and ωD–ωD′ pair in the nonflat universe
Vipin Chandra Dubey, Umesh Kumar Sharma and A. BeeshamInternational Journal of Modern Physics D 28 (15) 1950164 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271819501645
Searching for the evidence of dynamical dark energy
Deng Wang, Wei Zhang and Xin-He MengThe European Physical Journal C 79 (3) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6726-3
Measurement of marked correlation functions in SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey using LOWZ galaxies in Data Release 12
Siddharth Satpathy, Rupert A C Croft, Shirley Ho and Baojiu LiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (2) 2148 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz009
Kinetically coupled dark energy
Bruno J. BarrosPhysical Review D 99 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.064051
Cosmology and dark energy from joint gravitational wave-GRB observations
Enis Belgacem, Yves Dirian, Stefano Foffa, et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (08) 015 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/015
Early dark energy constraints on growing neutrino quintessence cosmologies
Finlay Noble Chamings, Anastasios Avgoustidis, Edmund J. Copeland, Anne M. Green and Baojiu LiPhysical Review D 100 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043525
Testing general relativity with the Doppler magnification effect
Sambatra Andrianomena, Camille Bonvin, David Bacon, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (3) 3759 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1905
Cosmology of surviving Horndeski theory: The road ahead
Noemi Frusciante, Simone Peirone, Santiago Casas and Nelson A. LimaPhysical Review D 99 (6) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063538
Cosmic time slip: Testing gravity on supergalactic scales with strong-lensing time delays
Dhrubo Jyoti, Julian B. Muñoz, Robert R. Caldwell and Marc KamionkowskiPhysical Review D 100 (4) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.043031
Dynamics of the generalized unimodular gravity theory
A. O. Barvinsky, N. Kolganov, A. Kurov and D. NesterovPhysical Review D 100 (2) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023542
The phenomenology of beyond Horndeski gravity
Dina Traykova, Emilio Bellini and Pedro G. FerreiraJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (08) 035 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/035
Cosmological test on viscous bulk models using Hubble parameter measurements and type Ia supernovae data
A. Hernández-AlmadaThe European Physical Journal C 79 (9) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7264-8
Large-scale inhomogeneity of dark energy produced in the ancestor vacuum
Yue Nan, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Hajime Aoki, Satoshi Iso and Daisuke YamauchiPhysical Review D 99 (10) (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.103512