Selection effects in the black hole-bulge relation and its evolution
A&A, 535 (2011) A87
Published online: 2011-11-15
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
The Host Galaxy (If Any) of the Little Red Dots
Chang-Hao 昌灏 Chen 陈, Luis C. Ho, Ruancun 阮存 Li 李 and Ming-Yang 明阳 Zhuang 庄The Astrophysical Journal 983 (1) 60 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada93a
The Assembly of Supermassive Black Holes at z < 1 in Early-type Galaxies from Scaling Relations
D. Farrah, A. Engholm, E. Hatziminaoglou, S. Petty, F. Shankar, A. Efstathiou, K. Ejercito, K. Jones, M. Lacy, C. Lonsdale, C. Pearson, G. Tarlé, R. A. Windhorst, J. Afonso, D. L. Clements, K. S. Croker and L. K. PitchfordThe Astrophysical Journal 981 (1) 71 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb0c7
The MBH–M∗ Relation up to z ∼ 2 through Decomposition of COSMOS-Web NIRCam Images
Takumi S. Tanaka, John D. Silverman, Xuheng Ding, Knud Jahnke, Benny Trakhtenbrot, Erini Lambrides, Masafusa Onoue, Irham Taufik Andika, Angela Bongiorno, Andreas L. Faisst, Steven Gillman, Christopher C. Hayward, Michaela Hirschmann, Anton Koekemoer, Vasily Kokorev, Zhaoxuan Liu, Georgios E. Magdis, Alvio Renzini, Caitlin Casey, Nicole E. Drakos, Maximilien Franco, Ghassem Gozaliasl, Jeyhan Kartaltepe, Daizhong Liu, Henry Joy McCracken, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 979 (2) 215 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d0a
JWST ERS Program Q3D: The pitfalls of virial black hole mass constraints shown for a z ∼ 3 quasar with an ultramassive host
C. Bertemes, D. Wylezalek, D. S. N. Rupke, N. L. Zakamska, S. Veilleux, B. Beckmann, A. Vayner, S. Sankar, Y. Ishikawa, N. Diachenko, W. Liu, Y.-C. Chen, J. Seebeck, D. Lutz and G. LiuAstronomy & Astrophysics 693 A176 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450451
Tip of the Iceberg: Overmassive Black Holes at 4 < z < 7 Found by JWST Are Not Inconsistent with the Local M BH - M ⋆ Relation
Junyao Li, John D. Silverman, Yue Shen, Marta Volonteri, Knud Jahnke, Ming-Yang Zhuang, Matthew T. Scoggins, Xuheng Ding, Yuichi Harikane, Masafusa Onoue and Takumi S. TanakaThe Astrophysical Journal 981 (1) 19 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada603
A New Approach to Constraining Properties of Active Galactic Nucleus Host Galaxies by Combining Image and Spectral Energy Distribution Decomposition: Testing upon the M BH–M ⋆ Relation
Haoran 浩然 Yu 于, Lulu 璐璐 Fan 范, Yunkun 云坤 Han 韩, Weibin 卫斌 Sun 孙, Yihang 迤航 Zhang 张, Xuheng 旭恒 Ding 丁 and Yongquan 永泉 Xue 薛The Astrophysical Journal 978 (2) 164 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9aa3
Combining Direct Black Hole Mass Measurements and Spatially Resolved Stellar Kinematics to Calibrate the M BH–σ ⋆ Relation of Active Galaxies
Nico Winkel, Vardha N. Bennert, Raymond P. Remigio, Tommaso Treu, Knud Jahnke, Vivian U, Aaron J. Barth, Matthew Malkan, Bernd Husemann, Xuheng Ding and Simon BirrerThe Astrophysical Journal 978 (1) 115 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9272
No Evidence for a Significant Evolution of M•–M. Relation in Massive Galaxies up to z ∼ 4
Yang Sun, Jianwei 建伟 Lyu 吕, George H. Rieke, Zhiyuan Ji, Fengwu Sun, Yongda Zhu, Andrew J. Bunker, Phillip A. Cargile, Chiara Circosta, Francesco D’Eugenio, Eiichi Egami, Kevin Hainline, Jakob M. Helton, Pierluigi Rinaldi, Brant E. Robertson, Jan Scholtz, Irene Shivaei, Meredith A. Stone, Sandro Tacchella, Christina C. Williams, Christopher N. A. Willmer and Chris WillottThe Astrophysical Journal 978 (1) 98 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad973b
Constraints on Cosmological Coupling from the Accretion History of Supermassive Black Holes
Mark Lacy, Athena Engholm, Duncan Farrah and Kiana EjercitoThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 961 (2) L33 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad1b5f
Cold quasar investigation: comparing star formation rates to black hole growth
Sasha Mintz, Brandon Coleman and Allison KirkpatrickMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 528 (4) 7376 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae465
Active Galactic Nuclei and Host Galaxies in COSMOS-Web. I. NIRCam Images, Point-spread-function Models and Initial Results on X-Ray-selected Broad-line AGNs at 0.35 ≲ z ≲ 3.5
Ming-Yang 明阳 Zhuang 庄, Junyao Li and Yue ShenThe Astrophysical Journal 962 (1) 93 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1517
The miniJPAS survey: AGN and host galaxy coevolution of X-ray-selected sources
I. E. López, M. Brusa, S. Bonoli, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 672 A137 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202245168
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: The Black Hole Mass–Stellar Mass Relations at 0.2 ≲ z ≲ 0.8
Jennifer I-Hsiu Li, Yue Shen, Luis C. Ho, W. N. Brandt, Catherine J. Grier, Patrick B. Hall, Y. Homayouni, Anton M. Koekemoer, Donald P. Schneider and Jonathan R. TrumpThe Astrophysical Journal 954 (2) 173 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acddda
A Preferential Growth Channel for Supermassive Black Holes in Elliptical Galaxies at z ≲ 2
Duncan Farrah, Sara Petty, Kevin S. Croker, Gregory Tarlé, Michael Zevin, Evanthia Hatziminaoglou, Francesco Shankar, Lingyu Wang, David L Clements, Andreas Efstathiou, Mark Lacy, Kurtis A. Nishimura, Jose Afonso, Chris Pearson and Lura K PitchfordThe Astrophysical Journal 943 (2) 133 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acac2e
What Does the Geometry of the Hβ BLR Depend On?
Lizvette Villafaña, Peter R. Williams, Tommaso Treu, Brendon J. Brewer, Aaron J. Barth, Vivian U, Vardha N. Bennert, Hengxiao Guo, Misty C. Bentz, Gabriela Canalizo, Alexei V. Filippenko, Elinor Gates, Michael D. Joner, Matthew A. Malkan, Jong-Hak Woo, Bela Abolfathi, Thomas Bohn, K. Azalee Bostroem, Andrew Brandel, Thomas G. Brink, Sanyum Channa, Maren Cosens, Edward Donohue, Goni Halevi, Carol E. Hood, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 948 (2) 95 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/accc84
Co-evolution of massive black holes and their host galaxies at high redshift: discrepancies from six cosmological simulations and the key role of JWST
Mélanie Habouzit, Masafusa Onoue, Eduardo Bañados, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (3) 3751 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac225
The X–shooter/ALMA Sample of Quasars in the Epoch of Reionization. II. Black Hole Masses, Eddington Ratios, and the Formation of the First Quasars
Emanuele Paolo Farina, Jan-Torge Schindler, Fabian Walter, Eduardo Bañados, Frederick B. Davies, Roberto Decarli, Anna-Christina Eilers, Xiaohui Fan, Joseph F. Hennawi, Chiara Mazzucchelli, Romain A. Meyer, Benny Trakhtenbrot, Marta Volonteri, Feige Wang, Gábor Worseck, Jinyi Yang, Thales A. Gutcke, Bram P. Venemans, Sarah E. I. Bosman, Tiago Costa, Gisella De Rosa, Alyssa B. Drake and Masafusa OnoueThe Astrophysical Journal 941 (2) 106 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9626
Cross-checking SMBH mass estimates in NGC 6958 – I. Stellar dynamics from adaptive optics-assisted MUSE observations
Sabine Thater, Davor Krajnović, Peter M Weilbacher, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509 (4) 5416 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3210
Synchronized Coevolution between Supermassive Black Holes and Galaxies over the Last Seven Billion Years as Revealed by Hyper Suprime-Cam
Junyao Li, John D. Silverman, Xuheng Ding, Michael A. Strauss, Andy Goulding, Malte Schramm, Hassen M. Yesuf, Mouyuan Sun, Yongquan Xue, Simon Birrer, Jingjing Shi, Yoshiki Toba, Tohru Nagao and Masatoshi ImanishiThe Astrophysical Journal 922 (2) 142 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2301
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: The M BH–Host Relations at 0.2 ≲ z ≲ 0.6 from Reverberation Mapping and Hubble Space Telescope Imaging
Jennifer I-Hsiu Li, Yue Shen, Luis C. Ho, W. N. Brandt, Elena Dalla Bontà, G. Fonseca Alvarez, C. J. Grier, J. V. Hernandez Santisteban, Y. Homayouni, Keith Horne, B. M. Peterson, D. P. Schneider and Jonathan R. TrumpThe Astrophysical Journal 906 (2) 103 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc8e6
Past, Present, and Future of the Scaling Relations of Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei
Mauro D’Onofrio, Paola Marziani and Cesare ChiosiFrontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 8 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2021.694554
It is feasible to directly measure black hole masses in the first galaxies
Hamsa Padmanabhan and Abraham LoebJournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (03) 032 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/032
The Mass Relations between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host Galaxies at 1 < z < 2 with HST-WFC3
Xuheng Ding, John Silverman, Tommaso Treu, Andreas Schulze, Malte Schramm, Simon Birrer, Daeseong Park, Knud Jahnke, Vardha N. Bennert, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Anton M. Koekemoer, Matthew A. Malkan and David SandersThe Astrophysical Journal 888 (1) 37 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b90
Limits to Rest-frame Ultraviolet Emission from Far-infrared-luminous z ≃ 6 Quasar Hosts
M. A. Marshall, M. Mechtley, R. A. Windhorst, S. H. Cohen, R. A. Jansen, L. Jiang, V. R. Jones, J. S. B. Wyithe, X. Fan, N. P. Hathi, K. Jahnke, W. C. Keel, A. M. Koekemoer, V. Marian, K. Ren, J. Robinson, H. J. A. Röttgering, R. E. Ryan, E. Scannapieco, D. P. Schneider, G. Schneider, B. M. Smith and H. YanThe Astrophysical Journal 900 (1) 21 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abaa4c
Host galaxy properties and environment of obscured and unobscured X-ray selected active galactic nuclei in the COSMOS survey
D García Lambas and C BornanciniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (1) 1189 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa723
Dark-ages reionization and galaxy formation simulation – XVIII. The high-redshift evolution of black holes and their host galaxies
J Stuart B Wyithe, Gregory B Poole, Yuxiang Qin, Simon J Mutch and Madeline A MarshallMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (2) 2747 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa936
Testing the evolution of correlations between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies using eight strongly lensed quasars
Xuheng Ding, Tommaso Treu, Simon Birrer, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (1) 269 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2992
A Catastrophic Failure to Build a Massive Galaxy around a Supermassive Black Hole at z = 3.84
M. Schramm, W. Rujopakarn, J. D. Silverman, T. Nagao, A. Schulze, M. Akiyama, H. Ikeda, K. Ohta and J. KotilainenThe Astrophysical Journal 881 (2) 145 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2cd3
Major Mergers Are Not the Dominant Trigger for High-accretion AGNs at z ∼ 2
Victor Marian, Knud Jahnke, Mira Mechtley, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 882 (2) 141 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab385b
Subaru High-z Exploration of Low-luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). VI. Black Hole Mass Measurements of Six Quasars at 6.1 ≤ z ≤ 6.7
Masafusa Onoue, Nobunari Kashikawa, Yoshiki Matsuoka, Nanako Kato, Takuma Izumi, Tohru Nagao, Michael A. Strauss, Yuichi Harikane, Masatoshi Imanishi, Kei Ito, Kazushi Iwasawa, Toshihiro Kawaguchi, Chien-Hsiu Lee, Akatoki Noboriguchi, Hyewon Suh, Masayuki Tanaka and Yoshiki TobaThe Astrophysical Journal 880 (2) 77 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab29e9
Evolution of Black Hole and Galaxy Growth in a Semi-numerical Galaxy Formation Model
Mackenzie L. Jones, Ryan C. Hickox, Simon J. Mutch, Darren J. Croton, Andrew F. Ptak and Michael A. DiPompeoThe Astrophysical Journal 881 (2) 110 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d9f
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Quasar Host Galaxies at z < 0.8 from Image Decomposition
Minghao Yue, Linhua Jiang, Yue Shen, Patrick B. Hall, Zhefu Yu, Donald P. Schneider, Luis C. Ho, Keith Horne, Patrick Petitjean and Jonathan R. TrumpThe Astrophysical Journal 863 (1) 21 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aacf04
BlueTides simulation: establishing black hole−galaxy relations at high redshift
Kuan-Wei Huang, Tiziana Di Matteo, Aklant K Bhowmick, Yu Feng and Chung-Pei MaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (4) 5063 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1329
The evolution of chemical abundance in quasar broad line region
Fei Xu, Fuyan Bian, Yue Shen, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (1) 345 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1763
AGN Evolution from the Galaxy Evolution Viewpoint. II.
Neven Caplar, Simon J. Lilly and Benny TrakhtenbrotThe Astrophysical Journal 867 (2) 148 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae691
The Chandra deep fields: Lifting the veil on distant active galactic nuclei and X-ray emitting galaxies
Y.Q. XueNew Astronomy Reviews 79 59 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2017.09.002
Do You See What I See? Exploring the Consequences of Luminosity Limits in Black Hole–Galaxy Evolution Studies
Mackenzie L. Jones, Ryan C. Hickox, Simon J. Mutch, Darren J. Croton, Andrew F. Ptak and Michael A. DiPompeoThe Astrophysical Journal 843 (2) 125 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7632
Observational constraints on the specific accretion-rate distribution of X-ray-selected AGNs
A. Georgakakis, J. Aird, A. Schulze, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 471 (2) 1976 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1602
H0LiCOW VII: cosmic evolution of the correlation between black hole mass and host galaxy luminosity
Xuheng Ding, Tommaso Treu, Sherry H. Suyu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (1) 90 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1972
Active Galactic Nuclei with a Low-metallicity Narrow-line Region
Kota Kawasaki, Tohru Nagao, Yoshiki Toba, Koki Terao and Kenta MatsuokaThe Astrophysical Journal 842 (1) 44 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa70e1
High-redshift Galaxies and Black Holes Detectable with the JWST: A Population Synthesis Model from Infrared to X-Rays
Marta Volonteri, Amy E. Reines, Hakim Atek, Daniel P. Stark and Maxime TrebitschThe Astrophysical Journal 849 (2) 155 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa93f1
DO THE MOST MASSIVE BLACK HOLES AT z = 2 GROW VIA MAJOR MERGERS?
M. Mechtley, K. Jahnke, R. A. Windhorst, R. Andrae, M. Cisternas, S. H. Cohen, T. Hewlett, A. M. Koekemoer, M. Schramm, A. Schulze, J. D. Silverman, C. Villforth, A. van der Wel and L. WisotzkiThe Astrophysical Journal 830 (2) 156 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/830/2/156
From the Realm of the Nebulae to Populations of Galaxies
Mauro D’Onofrio, Roberto Rampazzo, Simone Zaggia, et al.Astrophysics and Space Science Library, From the Realm of the Nebulae to Populations of Galaxies 435 243 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31006-0_4
INFERENCES ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN CENTRAL BLACK HOLE MASS AND TOTAL GALAXY STELLAR MASS IN THE HIGH-REDSHIFT UNIVERSE
Marta Volonteri and Amy E. ReinesThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 820 (1) L6 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/820/1/L6
Near-infrared spectroscopy of quasars at z ∼ 3 and estimates of their supermassive black hole masses
Yuriko Saito, Masatoshi Imanishi, Yosuke Minowa, Tomoki Morokuma, Toshihiro Kawaguchi, Hiroaki Sameshima, Takeo Minezaki, Nagisa Oi, Tohru Nagao, Nozomu Kawatatu and Kenta MatsuokaPublications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 68 (1) (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psv102
Selection bias in dynamically measured supermassive black hole samples: its consequences and the quest for the most fundamental relation
Francesco Shankar, Mariangela Bernardi, Ravi K. Sheth, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (3) 3119 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw678
The cosmic evolution of massive black holes in the Horizon-AGN simulation
M. Volonteri, Y. Dubois, C. Pichon and J. DevriendtMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (3) 2979 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1123
TORQUE-LIMITED GROWTH OF MASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN GALAXIES ACROSS COSMIC TIME
Daniel Anglés-Alcázar, Feryal Özel, Romeel Davé, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 800 (2) 127 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/127
COSMIC EVOLUTION OF BLACK HOLES AND SPHEROIDS. V. THE RELATION BETWEEN BLACK HOLE MASS AND HOST GALAXY LUMINOSITY FOR A SAMPLE OF 79 ACTIVE GALAXIES
Daeseong Park, Jong-Hak Woo, Vardha N. Bennert, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 799 (2) 164 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/164
THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY REVERBERATION MAPPING PROJECT: POST-STARBURST SIGNATURES IN QUASAR HOST GALAXIES ATz< 1
Yoshiki Matsuoka, Michael A. Strauss, Yue Shen, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 811 (2) 91 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/91
A HERSCHEL STUDY OF 24 μ m-SELECTED AGNs AND THEIR HOST GALAXIES
Lei Xu, G. H. Rieke, E. Egami, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 219 (2) 18 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/18
THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY REVERBERATION MAPPING PROJECT: NO EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION IN THE ${{M}_{\bullet }}-{{\sigma }_{*}}$ RELATION TO $z\sim 1$
Yue Shen, Jenny E. Greene, Luis C. Ho, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 805 (2) 96 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/96
The cosmic growth of the active black hole population at 1
A. Schulze, A. Bongiorno, I. Gavignaud, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (3) 2085 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2549
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (3) 2085 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2549
Scaling relations between black holes and their host galaxies: comparing theoretical and observational measurements, and the impact of selection effects
C. DeGraf, T. Di Matteo, T. Treu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 (1) 913 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2002
The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
Joop Schaye, Robert A. Crain, Richard G. Bower, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446 (1) 521 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2058
Accounting for selection effects in the BH–bulge relations: no evidence for cosmological evolution
Andreas Schulze and Lutz WisotzkiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 438 (4) 3422 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2457
The MBH-M* relation for X-ray-obscured, red QSOs at 1.2 < z < 2.6
A. Bongiorno, R. Maiolino, M. Brusa, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (3) 2077 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1248
ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATES IN THE ERA OF TIME DOMAIN ASTRONOMY
Brandon C. Kelly, Tommaso Treu, Matthew Malkan, Anna Pancoast and Jong-Hak WooThe Astrophysical Journal 779 (2) 187 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/187
Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies
John Kormendy and Luis C. HoAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 51 (1) 511 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811
PRIMUS: AN OBSERVATIONALLY MOTIVATED MODEL TO CONNECT THE EVOLUTION OF THE ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS AND GALAXY POPULATIONS OUT TOz∼ 1
James Aird, Alison L. Coil, John Moustakas, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 775 (1) 41 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/41
THEMBH-LSPHEROIDRELATION AT HIGH AND LOW MASSES, THE QUADRATIC GROWTH OF BLACK HOLES, AND INTERMEDIATE-MASS BLACK HOLE CANDIDATES
Alister W. Graham and Nicholas ScottThe Astrophysical Journal 764 (2) 151 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/151
THE BLACK HOLE-BULGE MASS RELATION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN THE EXTENDEDCHANDRADEEP FIELD-SOUTH SURVEY
Malte Schramm and John D. SilvermanThe Astrophysical Journal 767 (1) 13 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/13
The mean star-forming properties of QSO host galaxies
D. J. Rosario, B. Trakhtenbrot, D. Lutz, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 560 A72 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322196
THE BLACK HOLE MASS-STELLAR VELOCITY DISPERSION RELATIONSHIP FOR QUASARS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 7
S. Salviander and G. A. ShieldsThe Astrophysical Journal 764 (1) 80 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/80
DO QUIESCENT AND ACTIVE GALAXIES HAVE DIFFERENTMBH-σ*RELATIONS?
Jong-Hak Woo, Andreas Schulze, Daeseong Park, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 772 (1) 49 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/49
Constraining the last 7 billion years of galaxy evolution in semi-analytic models
Simon J. Mutch, Gregory B. Poole and Darren J. CrotonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (3) 2001 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts182
THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF BROAD-LINE QUASARS IN THE MASS-LUMINOSITY PLANE. II. BLACK HOLE MASS AND EDDINGTON RATIO FUNCTIONS
Brandon C. Kelly and Yue ShenThe Astrophysical Journal 764 (1) 45 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/45
MASSIVE STAR-FORMING HOST GALAXIES OF QUASARS ON SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STRIPE 82
Yoshiki Matsuoka, Michael A. Strauss, Ted N. Price and Matthew S. DiDonatoThe Astrophysical Journal 780 (2) 162 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/162
RECALIBRATION OF THE VIRIAL FACTOR AND M BH -σ * RELATION FOR LOCAL ACTIVE GALAXIES
Daeseong Park, Brandon C. Kelly, Jong-Hak Woo and Tommaso TreuThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 203 (1) 6 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/203/1/6
Is there evolution in the black hole - bulge relation?
Andreas Schulze and Lutz WisotzkiProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 8 (S295) 186 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921313004730
A BAYESIAN MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS OF THE M-σ RELATION
Leah K. Morabito and Xinyu DaiThe Astrophysical Journal 757 (2) 172 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/172
BREAKING THE LAW: THEMbh-MspheroidRELATIONS FOR CORE-SÉRSIC AND SÉRSIC GALAXIES
Alister W. GrahamThe Astrophysical Journal 746 (1) 113 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/113
Mass Functions of Supermassive Black Holes across Cosmic Time
Brandon C. Kelly and Andrea MerloniAdvances in Astronomy 2012 1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/970858
THE COSMIC EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND GALAXY SPHEROIDS: GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS AT REDSHIFTz≲ 1.2
Xiaoxia Zhang, Youjun Lu and Qingjuan YuThe Astrophysical Journal 761 (1) 5 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/5