Revisiting the Hubble sequence in the SDSS DR7 spectroscopic sample: a publicly available Bayesian automated classification
A&A, 525 (2011) A157
Published online: 2010-12-10
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Selection bias in dynamically measured supermassive black hole samples: scaling relations and correlations between residuals in semi-analytic galaxy formation models
Enrico Barausse, Francesco Shankar, Mariangela Bernardi, Yohan Dubois and Ravi K. ShethMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 468 (4) 4782 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx799
Merging groups and clusters of galaxies from the SDSS data
E. Tempel, T. Tuvikene, R. Kipper and N. I. LibeskindAstronomy & Astrophysics 602 A100 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730499
The morphological transformation of red sequence galaxies in clusters since z ∼ 1
P. Cerulo, W. J. Couch, C. Lidman, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 472 (1) 254 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1687
From voids to filaments: environmental transformations of galaxies in the SDSS
Teet Kuutma, Antti Tamm and Elmo TempelAstronomy & Astrophysics 600 L6 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730526
Comparing pymorph and SDSS photometry – II. The differences are more than semantics and are not dominated by intracluster light
M. Bernardi, J.-L. Fischer, R. K. Sheth, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 468 (3) 2569 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx677
Morphology-based Query for Galaxy Image Databases
Lior ShamirPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 129 (972) 024003 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1538-3873/129/972/024003
The weirdest SDSS galaxies: results from an outlier detection algorithm
Dalya Baron and Dovi PoznanskiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (4) 4530 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3021
Alignment of galaxies relative to their local environment in SDSS-DR8
A. Hirv, J. Pelt, E. Saar, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 599 A31 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629248
SDSS-IV MaNGA: bulge–disc decomposition of IFU data cubes (BUDDI)
Evelyn J. Johnston, Boris Häußler, Alfonso Aragón-Salamanca, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 2317 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2823
No evidence for small disk-like bulges in a sample of late-type spirals
L. Costantin, J. Méndez-Abreu, E. M. Corsini, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 601 A84 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630302
Bulges and discs in the local Universe. Linking the galaxy structure to star formation activity
L. Morselli, P. Popesso, G. Erfanianfar and A. ConcasAstronomy & Astrophysics 597 A97 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629409
Selection bias in dynamically measured supermassive black hole samples: its consequences and the quest for the most fundamental relation
Francesco Shankar, Mariangela Bernardi, Ravi K. Sheth, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (3) 3119 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw678
Full stellar kinematical profiles of central parts of nearby galaxies
A. Vudragović, S. Samurović and M. JovanovićAstronomy & Astrophysics 593 A40 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527215
The massive end of the luminosity and stellar mass functions and clustering from CMASS to SDSS: evidence for and against passive evolution
M. Bernardi, A. Meert, R. K. Sheth, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (4) 4122 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2487
The fate of high-redshift massive compact galaxies
Ignacio G. de la Rosa, Francesco La Barbera, Ignacio Ferreras, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (2) 1916 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw130
Multi-wavelength landscape of the young galaxy cluster RXJ 1257.2+4738 atz= 0.866
I. Pintos-Castro, M. Pović, M. Sánchez-Portal, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A108 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526744
Galaxy Zoo: comparing the demographics of spiral arm number and a new method for correcting redshift bias
Ross E. Hart, Steven P. Bamford, Kyle W. Willett, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 461 (4) 3663 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1588
OF GENES AND MACHINES: APPLICATION OF A COMBINATION OF MACHINE LEARNING TOOLS TO ASTRONOMY DATA SETS
S. Heinis, S. Kumar, S. Gezari, W. S. Burgett, K. C. Chambers, P. W. Draper, H. Flewelling, N. Kaiser, E. A. Magnier, N. Metcalfe and C. WatersThe Astrophysical Journal 821 (2) 86 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/86
THE CARNEGIE-IRVINE GALAXY SURVEY. IV. A METHOD TO DETERMINE THE AVERAGE MASS RATIO OF MERGERS THAT BUILT MASSIVE ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES
Song Huang(黄崧), Luis C. Ho, Chien Y. Peng, Zhao-Yu Li(李兆聿) and Aaron J. BarthThe Astrophysical Journal 821 (2) 114 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/114
The matter distribution in the local Universe as derived from galaxy groups in SDSS DR12 and 2MRS
Christoph Saulder, Eelco van Kampen, Igor V. Chilingarian, Steffen Mieske and Werner W. ZeilingerAstronomy & Astrophysics 596 A14 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526711
A catalogue of two-dimensional photometric decompositions in the SDSS-DR7 spectroscopic main galaxy sample: extension togandibands
Alan Meert, Vinu Vikram and Mariangela BernardiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455 (3) 2440 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2475
ASTErIsM: application of topometric clustering algorithms in automatic galaxy detection and classification
A. Tramacere, D. Paraficz, P. Dubath, J.-P. Kneib and F. CourbinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (3) 2939 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2103
Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction
Sander Dieleman, Kyle W. Willett and Joni DambreMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (2) 1441 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv632
RELATIONS BETWEEN CENTRAL BLACK HOLE MASS AND TOTAL GALAXY STELLAR MASS IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE
Amy E. Reines and Marta VolonteriThe Astrophysical Journal 813 (2) 82 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82
A catalogue of 2D photometric decompositions in the SDSS-DR7 spectroscopic main galaxy sample: preferred models and systematics
Alan Meert, Vinu Vikram and Mariangela BernardiMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446 (4) 3943 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2333
The impact from survey depth and resolution on the morphological classification of galaxies
M. Pović, I. Márquez, J. Masegosa, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 (2) 1644 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1663
STAR-FORMING BLUE ETGS IN TWO NEWLY DISCOVERED GALAXY OVERDENSITIES IN THE HUDF ATz= 1.84 AND 1.9: UNVEILING THE PROGENITORS OF PASSIVE ETGS IN CLUSTER CORES
Simona Mei, Claudia Scarlata, Laura Pentericci, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 804 (2) 117 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/117
AVOIDING PROGENITOR BIAS: THE STRUCTURAL AND MASS EVOLUTION OF BRIGHTEST GROUP AND CLUSTER GALAXIES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELS SINCEz≲ 1
Francesco Shankar, Stewart Buchan, Alessandro Rettura, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 802 (2) 73 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/73
A CATALOG OF VISUAL-LIKE MORPHOLOGIES IN THE 5 CANDELS FIELDS USING DEEP LEARNING
M. Huertas-Company, R. Gravet, G. Cabrera-Vives, et al.The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 221 (1) 8 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/8
Galaxy morphology — An unsupervised machine learning approach
A. Schutter and L. ShamirAstronomy and Computing 12 60 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2015.05.002
MORFOMETRYKA—A NEW WAY OF ESTABLISHING MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES
F. Ferrari, R. R. de Carvalho and M. TrevisanThe Astrophysical Journal 814 (1) 55 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/55
Galaxy morphologies in the era of big-data surveys
M. Huertas-CompanyProceedings of the International Astronomical Union 11 (S319) 118 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743921315010911
A panchromatic survey of post-starburst mergers: searching for feedback
Roberto De Propris and Jorge MelnickMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (3) 2837 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu141
Herschel far-IR counterparts of SDSS galaxies: analysis of commonly used star formation rate estimates
H. Domínguez Sánchez, A. Bongiovanni, M. A. Lara-López, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (1) 2 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu503
Environmental dependence of bulge-dominated galaxy sizes in hierarchical models of galaxy formation. Comparison with the local Universe
Francesco Shankar, Simona Mei, Marc Huertas-Company, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (4) 3189 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2470
Galaxy size trends as a consequence of cosmology
M. J. Stringer, F. Shankar, G. S. Novak, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (2) 1570 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu645
Flux- and volume-limited groups/clusters for the SDSS galaxies: catalogues and mass estimation
E. Tempel, A. Tamm, M. Gramann, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 566 A1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423585
SDSS superclusters: morphology and galaxy content
M. Einasto, H. Lietzen, E. Tempel, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 562 A87 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323111
OFFSET ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI AS TRACERS OF GALAXY MERGERS AND SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE GROWTH
Julia M. Comerford and Jenny E. GreeneThe Astrophysical Journal 789 (2) 112 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/112
The morphological transformation of red sequence galaxies in the distant cluster XMMU J1229+0151
P. Cerulo, W. J. Couch, C. Lidman, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (3) 2790 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu135
Quantitative analysis of spirality in elliptical galaxies
Levente Dojcsak and Lior ShamirNew Astronomy 28 1 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newast.2013.09.006
Larger sizes of massive quiescent early-type galaxies in clusters than in the field at 0.8 < z < 1.5
L. Delaye, M. Huertas-Company, S. Mei, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 (1) 203 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu496
A multiple dry merger at z = 0.18: witnessing the assembly of a massive elliptical galaxy
M. E. Filho, P. Brochado, J. Brinchmann, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (1) 288 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1152
Systematic effects on the size–luminosity relations of early- and late-type galaxies: dependence on model fitting and morphology
M. Bernardi, A. Meert, V. Vikram, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 443 (1) 874 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1106
Combining Human and Machine Learning for Morphological Analysis of Galaxy Images
Evan Kuminski, Joe George, John Wallin and Lior ShamirPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 126 (944) 959 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1086/678977
GALAXY SPIN ALIGNMENT IN FILAMENTS AND SHEETS: OBSERVATIONAL EVIDENCE
Elmo Tempel and Noam I. LibeskindThe Astrophysical Journal 775 (2) L42 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L42
A Virtual Observatory Census to Address Dwarfs Origins (AVOCADO)
R. Sánchez-Janssen, R. Amorín, M. García-Vargas, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 554 A20 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219842
Evidence for spin alignment of spiral and elliptical/S0 galaxies in filaments
E. Tempel, R. S. Stoica and E. SaarMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1827 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts162
The ALHAMBRA survey: reliable morphological catalogue of 22 051 early- and late-type galaxies
M. Pović, M. Huertas-Company, J. A. L. Aguerri, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (4) 3444 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1538
SUPERDENSE GALAXIES AND THE MASS-SIZE RELATION AT LOW REDSHIFT
B. M. Poggianti, R. Calvi, D. Bindoni, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 762 (2) 77 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/77
Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304 122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Kyle W. Willett, Chris J. Lintott, Steven P. Bamford, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 435 (4) 2835 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1458
The massive end of the luminosity and stellar mass functions: dependence on the fit to the light profile
M. Bernardi, A. Meert, R. K. Sheth, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 436 (1) 697 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1607
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPECTROSCOPICALLY CONFIRMED GALAXIES ATz⩾ 6. II. MORPHOLOGY OF THE REST-FRAME UV CONTINUUM AND Lyα EMISSION
Linhua Jiang, Eiichi Egami, Xiaohui Fan, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 773 (2) 153 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/153
NO EVIDENCE FOR A DEPENDENCE OF THE MASS-SIZE RELATION OF EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES ON ENVIRONMENT IN THE LOCAL UNIVERSE
M. Huertas-Company, F. Shankar, S. Mei, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 779 (1) 29 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/29
The evolution of the mass–size relation for early-type galaxies from z ∼ 1 to the present: dependence on environment, mass range and detailed morphology
M. Huertas-Company, S. Mei, F. Shankar, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1715 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts150
Early-type galaxies have been the predominant morphological class for massive galaxies since only z ∼ 1
Fernando Buitrago, Ignacio Trujillo, Christopher J. Conselice and Boris HäußlerMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 428 (2) 1460 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts124
Automatic quantitative morphological analysis of interacting galaxies
Lior Shamir, Anthony Holincheck and John WallinAstronomy and Computing 2 67 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2013.09.002
The nature of extremely red galaxies in the local universe
Laerte Sodré, Aline Ribeiro da Silva and Walter A. SantosMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 434 (3) 2503 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1188
Non-parametric cell-based photometric proxies for galaxy morphology: methodology and application to the morphologically defined star formation–stellar mass relation of spiral galaxies in the local universe
M. W. Grootes, R. J. Tuffs, C. C. Popescu, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (4) 3883 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2184
Properties of the Photometric Components of Lenticular Galaxies
J. Alfonso L. AguerriAdvances in Astronomy 2012 1 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/382674
Groups and clusters of galaxies in the SDSS DR8
E. Tempel, E. Tago and L. J. LiivamägiAstronomy & Astrophysics 540 A106 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118687
THE NATURE AND NURTURE OF BARS AND DISKS
J. Méndez-Abreu, R. Sánchez-Janssen, J. A. L. Aguerri, E. M. Corsini and S. ZarattiniThe Astrophysical Journal 761 (1) L6 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/761/1/L6
KILOPARSEC-SCALE RADIO STRUCTURES IN NARROW-LINE SEYFERT 1 GALAXIES
Akihiro Doi, Hiroshi Nagira, Nozomu Kawakatu, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 760 (1) 41 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/41
EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES ATz= 1.3. I. THE LYNX SUPERCLUSTER: CLUSTER AND GROUPS ATz= 1.3. MORPHOLOGY AND COLOR-MAGNITUDE RELATION
Simona Mei, S. Adam Stanford, Brad P. Holden, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 754 (2) 141 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/141
Environments of galaxies in groups within the supercluster-void network
H. Lietzen, E. Tempel, P. Heinämäki, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 545 A104 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219353
Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy
LUCY FORTSON, KAREN MASTERS, ROBERT NICHOL, et al.Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series, Advances in Machine Learning and Data Mining for Astronomy 20124949 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1201/b11822-16
THE SPIN ALIGNMENTS IN GALAXY PAIRS AS A TEST OF BOUNCING COUPLED DARK ENERGY
Jounghun LeeThe Astrophysical Journal 751 (2) 153 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/153
DEPENDENCE OF BARRED GALAXY FRACTION ON GALAXY PROPERTIES AND ENVIRONMENT
Gwang-Ho Lee, Changbom Park, Myung Gyoon Lee and Yun-Young ChoiThe Astrophysical Journal 745 (2) 125 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/745/2/125
Dissecting the morphological and spectroscopic properties of galaxies in the local Universe
J. A. L. Aguerri, M. Huertas-Company, J. Sánchez Almeida and C. Muñoz-TuñónAstronomy & Astrophysics 540 A136 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117632
GANALYZER: A TOOL FOR AUTOMATIC GALAXY IMAGE ANALYSIS
Lior ShamirThe Astrophysical Journal 736 (2) 141 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/141
Only marginal alignment of disc galaxies
René Andrae and Knud JahnkeMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (3) 2014 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19620.x
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUBBLE TYPE AND SPECTROSCOPIC CLASS IN LOCAL GALAXIES
J. Sánchez Almeida, J. A. L. Aguerri, C. Muñoz-Tuñón and M. Huertas-CompanyThe Astrophysical Journal 735 (2) 125 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/125
GALAXY ZOO MORPHOLOGY AND PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
M. J. WayThe Astrophysical Journal 734 (1) L9 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/734/1/L9
Galaxy morphology, luminosity, and environment in the SDSS DR7
E. Tempel, E. Saar, L. J. Liivamägi, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 529 A53 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201016196
ON THE INTRINSIC ALIGNMENTS OF THE LATE-TYPE SPIRAL GALAXIES FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 7
Jounghun LeeThe Astrophysical Journal 732 (2) 99 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/99