EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues A&A, 507 2 (2009) 683-691 Article references

Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

Measuring σ 8 using DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys Emission-Line galaxies and Planck CMB lensing, and the impact of dust on parameter inference

Tanveer Karim, Sukhdeep Singh, Mehdi Rezaie, Daniel Eisenstein, Boryana Hadzhiyska, Joshua S. Speagle, Jessica Nicole Aguilar, Steven Ahlen, David Brooks, Todd Claybaugh, Axel de la Macorra, Simone Ferraro, Jaime E. Forero-Romero, Enrique Gaztañaga, Satya Gontcho A. Gontcho, Gaston Gutierrez, Julien Guy, Klaus Honscheid, Stephanie Juneau, David Kirkby, Alex Krolewski, Andrew Lambert, Martin Landriau, Michael Levi, Aaron Meisner, et al.
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025 (02) 045 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/045

PASSAGES: The Wide-ranging, Extreme Intrinsic Properties of Planck-selected, Lensed Dusty Star-forming Galaxies

Patrick S. Kamieneski, Min S. Yun, Kevin C. Harrington, James D. Lowenthal, Q. Daniel Wang, Brenda L. Frye, Eric F. Jiménez-Andrade, Amit Vishwas, Olivia Cooper, Massimo Pascale, Nicholas Foo, Derek Berman, Anthony Englert and Carlos Garcia Diaz
The Astrophysical Journal 961 (1) 2 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf930

On the bright end of the UV luminosity functions of galaxies at z ∼ 0.6–1.2

M Sharma, M J Page, I Ferreras and A A Breeveld
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531 (1) 2040 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1278

Constraining gravity with a new precision EG estimator using Planck + SDSS BOSS data

Lukas Wenzl, Rachel Bean, Shi-Fan Chen, Gerrit S. Farren, Mathew S. Madhavacheril, Gabriela A. Marques, Frank J. Qu, Neelima Sehgal, Blake D. Sherwin and Alexander van Engelen
Physical Review D 109 (8) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.083540

Magnification bias estimators for realistic surveys: an application to the BOSS survey

Lukas Wenzl, Shi-Fan Chen and Rachel Bean
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (2) 1760 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3314

Intrinsic correlations of galaxy sizes in a hydrodynamical cosmological simulation

Harry Johnston, Dana Sophia Westbeek, Sjoerd Weide, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 520 (1) 1541 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad201

A method of weak lensing reconstruction through cosmic magnification with multiband photometry information

Ruijie Ma, Pengjie Zhang, Yu Yu and Jian Qin
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (3) 7547 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3664

The Dark Energy Survey Year 3 high-redshift sample: selection, characterization, and analysis of galaxy clustering

C Sánchez, A Alarcon, G M Bernstein, J Sanchez, S Pandey, M Raveri, J Prat, N Weaverdyck, I Sevilla-Noarbe, C Chang, E Baxter, Y Omori, B Jain, O Alves, A Amon, K Bechtol, M R Becker, J Blazek, A Choi, A Campos, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, M Crocce, D Cross, J DeRose, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525 (3) 3896 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2402

Forecasting the potential of weak lensing magnification to enhance LSST large-scale structure analyses

Constance Mahony, Maria Cristina Fortuna, Benjamin Joachimi, Andreas Korn, Henk Hoekstra, Samuel J Schmidt, David Alonso, Sukhdeep Singh, Marina Ricci, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Christopher Duncan and Harry Johnston
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513 (1) 1210 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac872

Blending and obscuration in weak-lensing magnification

E Gaztanaga, S J Schmidt, M D Schneider and J A Tyson
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (4) 4964 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab539

Magnification bias in galaxy surveys with complex sample selection functions

Maximilian von Wietersheim-Kramsta, Benjamin Joachimi, Jan Luca van den Busch, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (1) 1452 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1000

Weak lensing magnification reconstruction with the modified internal linear combination method

Shu-Tong Hou, Yu Yu and Peng-Jie Zhang
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 21 (10) 247 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/10/247

Prospects for cosmic magnification measurements using H i intensity mapping

Mario G Santos, Alkistis Pourtsidou and Amadeus Witzemann
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (2) 1959 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1578

Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics

Niall Jeffrey, Justin Alsing and François Lanusse
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (1) 954 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3594

Developing a unified pipeline for large-scale structure data analysis with angular power spectra – II. A case study for magnification bias and radio continuum surveys

Konstantinos Tanidis, Stefano Camera and David Parkinson
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 491 (4) 4869 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3394

Nuisance hardened data compression for fast likelihood-free inference

Justin Alsing and Benjamin Wandelt
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (4) 5093 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1900

LARgE Survey – I. Dead monsters: the massive end of the passive galaxy stellar mass function at cosmic noon

Liz Arcila-Osejo, Marcin Sawicki, Stéphane Arnouts, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 486 (4) 4880 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1169

Probing gravity with a joint analysis of galaxy and CMB lensing and SDSS spectroscopy

Sukhdeep Singh, Shadab Alam, Rachel Mandelbaum, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482 (1) 785 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2681

Calibrating magnification bias for the EG statistic to test general relativity

S Yang and Anthony R Pullen
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2) 1441 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2353

Weak lensing magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data

M Garcia-Fernandez, E Sanchez, I Sevilla-Noarbe, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 476 (1) 1071 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty282

A study of the sensitivity of shape measurements to the input parameters of weak-lensing image simulations

Henk Hoekstra, Massimo Viola and Ricardo Herbonnet
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 468 (3) 3295 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx724

Weak-lensing Power Spectrum Reconstruction by Counting Galaxies. I. The ABS Method

Xinjuan Yang, Jun Zhang, Yu Yu and Pengjie Zhang
The Astrophysical Journal 845 (2) 174 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7ed4

Cluster mass profile reconstruction with size and flux magnification on theHSTSTAGES survey

Christopher A. J. Duncan, Catherine Heymans, Alan F. Heavens and Benjamin Joachimi
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (1) 764 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw027

Probing Cosmic Dark Matter and Dark Energy with Weak Gravitational Lensing Statistics

Masato Shirasaki
Springer Theses, Probing Cosmic Dark Matter and Dark Energy with Weak Gravitational Lensing Statistics 31 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-796-3_3

CFHTLenS and RCSLenS: testing photometric redshift distributions using angular cross-correlations with spectroscopic galaxy surveys

A. Choi, C. Heymans, C. Blake, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (4) 3737 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2241

MATTER IN THE BEAM: WEAK LENSING, SUBSTRUCTURES, AND THE TEMPERATURE OF DARK MATTER

Hareth S. Mahdi, Pascal J. Elahi, Geraint F. Lewis and Chris Power
The Astrophysical Journal 826 (2) 212 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/212

Modelling the impact of intrinsic size and luminosity correlations on magnification estimation

Sandro Ciarlariello and Robert Crittenden
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (1) 740 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2052

Weak lensing with sizes, magnitudes and shapes

Justin Alsing, Donnacha Kirk, Alan Heavens and Andrew H. Jaffe
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (2) 1202 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1249

Weak lensing reconstruction through cosmic magnification – II. Improved power spectrum determination and map-making

Xinjuan Yang, Pengjie Zhang, Jun Zhang and Yu Yu
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (1) 345 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2375

Intrinsic size correlations in weak lensing

Sandro Ciarlariello, Robert Crittenden and Francesco Pace
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 2059 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv447

Mitigating systematic errors in angular correlation function measurements from wide field surveys

C. B. Morrison and H. Hildebrandt
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 (3) 3121 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2103

ULTRA-LARGE-SCALE COSMOLOGY IN NEXT-GENERATION EXPERIMENTS WITH SINGLE TRACERS

David Alonso, Philip Bull, Pedro G. Ferreira, Roy Maartens and Mário G. Santos
The Astrophysical Journal 814 (2) 145 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/145

CFHTLenS: a weak lensing shear analysis of the 3D-Matched-Filter galaxy clusters

Jes Ford, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, Martha Milkeraitis, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (2) 1304 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2545

Cluster magnification and the mass–richness relation in CFHTLenS

Jes Ford, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 439 (4) 3755 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu225

On the complementarity of galaxy clustering with cosmic shear and flux magnification

Christopher A. J. Duncan, Benjamin Joachimi, Alan F. Heavens, Catherine Heymans and Hendrik Hildebrandt
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 437 (3) 2471 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2060

THE NEXT GENERATION VIRGO CLUSTER SURVEY. XV. THE PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT ESTIMATION FOR BACKGROUND SOURCES

A. Raichoor, S. Mei, T. Erben, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 797 (2) 102 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/102

Combining size and shape in weak lensing

Alan Heavens, Justin Alsing and Andrew H. Jaffe
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 433 (1) L6 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slt045

Inferring the mass of submillimetre galaxies by exploiting their gravitational magnification of background galaxies

H. Hildebrandt, L. van Waerbeke, D. Scott, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 429 (4) 3230 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts585

Size magnification as a complement to cosmic shear

B. Casaponsa, A. F. Heavens, T. D. Kitching, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (4) 2844 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt088

CFHTLenS: higher order galaxy–mass correlations probed by galaxy–galaxy–galaxy lensing

P. Simon, T. Erben, P. Schneider, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 430 (3) 2476 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt069

Cosmological measurements with forthcoming radio continuum surveys

Alvise Raccanelli, Gong-Bo Zhao, David J. Bacon, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 424 (2) 801 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20634.x

Gravitational lensing simulations - I. Covariance matrices and halo catalogues

Joachim Harnois-Déraps, Sanaz Vafaei and Ludovic Van Waerbeke
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (2) 1262 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21624.x

A DETECTION OF WEAK-LENSING MAGNIFICATION USING GALAXY SIZES AND MAGNITUDES

Fabian Schmidt, Alexie Leauthaud, Richard Massey, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 744 (2) L22 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/744/2/L22

THE NEXT GENERATION VIRGO CLUSTER SURVEY (NGVS). I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SURVEY*

Laura Ferrarese, Patrick Côté, Jean-Charles Cuillandre, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 200 (1) 4 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/4

Tomographic magnification of Lyman-break galaxies in the Deep Lens Survey

C. B. Morrison, R. Scranton, B. Ménard, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 426 (3) 2489 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21826.x

Cross-correlation of spectroscopic and photometric galaxy surveys: cosmology from lensing and redshift distortions

Enrique Gaztañaga, Martin Eriksen, Martin Crocce, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 422 (4) 2904 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20613.x

The optimal weighting function for cosmic magnification measurements through the foreground galaxy-background galaxy (quasar) cross-correlation

Xiaofeng Yang and Pengjie Zhang
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 415 (1) L45 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01075.x

LENSING MAGNIFICATION: A NOVEL METHOD TO WEIGH HIGH-REDSHIFT CLUSTERS AND ITS APPLICATION TO SpARCS

H. Hildebrandt, A. Muzzin, T. Erben, et al.
The Astrophysical Journal 733 (2) L30 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/733/2/L30

AzTEC millimetre survey of the COSMOS field - III. Source catalogue over 0.72 deg2 and plausible boosting by large-scale structure

I. Aretxaga, G. W. Wilson, E. Aguilar, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 415 (4) 3831 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18989.x

Weak lensing reconstruction through cosmic magnification - I. A minimal variance map reconstruction

Xinjuan Yang and Pengjie Zhang
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 415 (4) 3485 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18956.x