To further strengthen our argument presented in the previous sections, we looked for other intrinsic correlations
among galaxy clusters and unidentified EGRET sources. Specifically, we correlated the cluster X-ray luminosity,
,
with the luminosity of the associated EGRET source under the assumption that it is physically
associated to the cluster and, hence, has the same redshift. We derived the gamma-ray luminosity,
,
of
each EGRET source from the gamma-ray fluxes at E > 100 MeV given in the Third EGRET catalog (Hartman et al. 1999) using the cluster optical redshift given in Table 1.
We consider the same EGRET-cluster associations (with the exception of the
source 3EGJ0159-3603 associated with the clusters Abell 219S and Abell 2963 because no
reliable redshift is available for these clusters) which show the
correlation analyzed in the previous Sect. 4.
The
correlation shown by the data (see Fig. 10) is fitted by
with best fit values
and
(
errors). A similar result, however,
is also found for viewing periods P1234 which do not show, in general, the best S/N ratios for the detected EGRET
sources: in this last case we found
and
(
errors). In any case,
the
relation shown by the data is significant at more than the
confidence level.
Such a
correlation indicates a connection between the physical status of the cluster ICM,
and of its galaxy content, and the overall gamma-ray emissivity of the cluster: such a connection is indeed
expected in the viable model for the gamma-ray emission of galaxy clusters. In fact, both the diffuse emission
arising from the interaction of relativistic particles with the cluster ICM and the one arising from a
superposition of the gamma-ray emission associated with individual galaxies within the cluster predict a relation
with
.
Specifically, the cluster gamma-ray luminosity
produced by non-thermal electron bremsstrahlung (see, e.g., Longair 1993),
![]() |
(1) |
![]() |
(2) |
![]() |
(3) |
![]() |
(4) |
![]() |
Figure 10:
The
|
Copyright ESO 2002