A&A 475, 1159-1183 (2007)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077638
Automated supervised classification of variable stars
I. Methodology
J. Debosscher1, L. M. Sarro2, 3, C. Aerts1, 4, J. Cuypers5, B. Vandenbussche1, R. Garrido6, and E. Solano7, 31 Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200B, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
2 Dpt. de Inteligencia Artificial , UNED, Juan del Rosal, 16, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3 Spanish Virtual Observatory, INTA, Apartado de Correos 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain
4 Department of Astrophysics, Radbout University Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands
5 Royal Observatory of Belgium, Ringlaan 3, 1180 Brussel, Belgium
6 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía-CSIC, Apdo 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain
7 Laboratorio de Astrofísica Espacial y Física Fundamental, INSA, Apartado de Correos 50727, 28080 Madrid, Spain
(Received 13 April 2007 / Accepted 7 August 2007)
Abstract
Context.The fast classification of new variable stars is an important step
in making them available for further research. Selection of science targets from
large databases is much more efficient if they have been classified
first. Defining the classes in terms of physical parameters is also important
to get an unbiased statistical view on the variability
mechanisms and the borders of instability strips.
Aims.Our goal is twofold: provide an overview of the stellar variability
classes that are presently known, in terms of some relevant stellar
parameters; use the class descriptions obtained as the basis for an
automated
"supervised classification" of large databases. Such automated
classification will compare and assign new objects to a set of pre-defined
variability training classes.
Methods.For every variability class, a literature search was performed to find as many
well-known member stars as possible, or a considerable subset if too many were
present. Next, we searched on-line and private databases for their light curves
in the visible band and performed period analysis and harmonic fitting. The
derived light curve parameters are used to describe the classes and define the
training classifiers.
Results.We compared the performance of different classifiers in terms of percentage of
correct identification, of confusion among classes and of computation time. We
describe how well the classes can be separated using the proposed set of
parameters and how future improvements can be made, based on new large
databases such as the light curves to be assembled by the CoRoT and Kepler
space missions.
Conclusions.The derived classifiers' performances are so good in terms of success rate
and computational speed that we will evaluate them in practice from the
application of our methodology to a large subset of variable stars in the OGLE
database and from comparison of the results
with published OGLE variable star classifications based on human
intervention. These results will be published
in a subsequent paper.
Key words: stars: variables: general -- stars: binaries: general -- techniques: photometric -- methods: statistical -- methods: data analysis
© ESO 2007

BibSonomy
CiteUlike
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Twitter