A&A 405, 99-109 (2003)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030585
D. Monnier Ragaigne1 - W. van Driel1 - S. E. Schneider2 - T. H. Jarrett3 - C. Balkowski1
1 - Observatoire de Paris, GEPI, CNRS UMR 8111 and Université Paris 7,
5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France
2 -
University of Massachusetts, Astronomy Program, 536 LGRC, Amherst,
MA 01003, USA
3 -
IPAC, Caltech, MS 100-22, 770 South Wilson Ave., Pasadena,
CA 91125, USA
Received 14 February 2003 / Accepted 16 April 2003
Abstract
A sample of about 3800 Low Surface Brightness (LSB) galaxies was selected using
the all-sky near-infrared (J, H and -band) 2MASS survey. The selected
objects have a mean central surface brightness within a 5'' radius around
their centre fainter than 18 mag arcsec-2 in the
band, making them the lowest
surface brightness galaxies detected by 2MASS.
A description is given of the relevant properties of the 2MASS
survey and the LSB galaxy selection procedure, as well as of basic
photometric properties of the selected objects. The latter properties
are compared to those of other samples of galaxies, of both LSBs and
"classical'' high surface brightness (HSB) objects, which were selected
in the optical. The 2MASS LSBs have a
colour which is on
average 0.9 mag bluer than that of HSBs from the NGC. The 2MASS sample
does not appear to contain a significant population of red objects.
Key words: galaxies: fundamental parameters - galaxies: general - galaxies: photometry - infrared: galaxies
In the past few decades, observations of the local universe have shown the existence of galaxies well below the surface brightness of the average previously catalogued galaxies, and often even well below the surface brightness of the night sky, which are referred to as Low Surface Brightness (LSB) galaxies.
At present, the LSBs constitute the least well known fraction of galaxies: their number density and physical properties (like luminosity, colours, dynamics) are still quite uncertain. This is, per definition, mainly due to the fundamental difficulty in identifying them in imaging surveys and in measuring their properties. It is far from obvious that all existing classes and types of LSBs have been probed, given the limitations in sensitivity of the actual detectors and the biases in the selection criteria of the published samples.
In order to further investigate the often baffling properties of the LSB class of galaxies we selected a large sample of them from the 2MASS database, accessing the near-infrared, a wavelength domain that has been much less fully explored than the optical in the study of LSBs.
To date, the following studies were published on the near-infrared properties
of LSB galaxies: Knezek & Wroten (1994) observed a small sample of mainly
massive galaxies in JHK, Bergvall et al. (1999) observed 14 blue LSBs in
JHK and compared their results to optical photometry, Bell et al. (2000)
observed 26 LSBs in JHK and a subset of these in ,
de Jong (1996) included
a few LSBs among the spiral galaxies he observed in H and K, and
Galaz et al. (2002) observed 88 LSBs in J and
.
Although there is no unambiguous definition of LSB galaxy, those in common use are based on (1) the mean blue surface brightness within the 25 mag arcsec-2 isophote, (2) the mean surface brightness within the half-light radius, or (3) the extrapolated central surface brightness of the disc component alone, after carrying out a disc-bulge decomposition.
For 2MASS galaxies, we used the mean -band magnitude within a fixed
aperture to identify a sample of galaxies with relatively low infrared
surface brightness. We selected galaxies in which the central surface brightness
within a 5'' radius circular aperture was fainter than 18 mag arcsec-2 in the
-band. This criterion selects a relatively small fraction (<10%) of large
angular diameter sources detected by 2MASS, increasing to about 40% for
the small angular diameter sources detected in the survey.
If 2MASS detections have B-K=4.0 colors typical of early-type galaxies (Jarrett et al.
2003; also see Sect. 4.4), as might be anticipated for a sample of infrared-selected
sources, this criterion would correspond roughly to the disc-component
definition that LSB galaxies are objects with a blue central surface brightness
mag arcsec-2 (i.e., more than 1
fainter than the
mag arcsec-2 measured by Freeman 1970).
Our sample galaxies can have an even lower disc surface brightness if the bulge
component is significant, but since we average over a fixed angular aperture, on
the other hand we may also include some higher central surface brightness sources
that are more distant so that the aperture includes
more of the disc. In this paper, we examine the properties of our sample based
on 2MASS and LEDA data and compare it to optically-selected galaxy samples.
LSBs have remarkable properties which distinguish them from "classical'' High Surface Brightness (HSB) spirals, notably:
This study of infrared LSBs was also intended to investigate the possibility
of there being a substantial population of red LSBs like those reported in
the optical -band study of O'Neil et al. (1997). Follow-up H I line studies
initially indicated that some of these red LSBs with rotational speeds
exceeding 200 km s-1 did not seem to follow the "standard'' Tully-Fisher relation
established for HSB galaxies, in the sense that they appeared to be severely
underluminous for their total mass (O'Neil et al. 2000). More recent
H I imaging observations by Chung et al. (2002) indicate that the rotational
properties and total H I mass of these red LSBs had been strongly overestimated
due to confusion within the telescope beam with neighbouring galaxies.
An infrared-selected sample should allow us to identify whether there is a significant
population of very red LSBs.
In the present paper a description is given of the 2MASS LSB galaxy sample
selection and its results, while 21-cm H I line observations from Arecibo
and Nançay will be presented in Papers II and III, respectively
(Monnier Ragaigne et al. 2003b,c), optical -band CCD surface photometry
of a sub-sample of 35 2MASS LSB galaxies will be presented in Paper IV
(Monnier Ragaigne et al. 2003d) and an analysis of the
full data set will be presented in Paper V.
Models of the evolution of the 2MASS galaxies presented in Paper IV and of
other samples of LSB galaxies are presented in Boissier et al. (2003).
The 2MASS survey is described in Sect. 2, and the 2MASS LSB galaxies sample selection in Sect. 3. Basic photometric properties of the sample are presented in Sect. 4 and compared with those of others samples of LSB and HSB galaxies. Subsets of the sample observed by us at other wavelengths are described in Sect. 5.
Though 2MASS perforce needed to sacrifice depth for all-sky coverage, and is
therefore less deep than some of the dedicated optical imaging surveys made
of LSB galaxies over limited areas of the sky, it should still be sensitive
to the bright end of the LSB spectrum, particularly if there is a class of
very red LSB objects. It has a 95% completeness level in
J, H and
of 15.1, 14.3 and 13.5 mag, respectively, for "normal''
galaxies (Jarrett et al. 2000); for LSB and blue objects the completeness
limits are not yet known. In practice, 2MASS detects galaxies with central surface
brightness values ranging from 14-20 mag arcsec-2 of which the LSB fraction with
mag arcsec-2 varies from
10% of the total 2MASS sample
for large galaxies (
)
to
40% for the smaller
galaxies (
). These near-infrared data will be
less susceptible than optical surveys to the effects of extinction due to
dust, both Galactic and internal to the galaxies. Also, the luminous mass
distribution of galaxies is dominated by the older stellar
populations, which emit most of their light in the near-infrared.
Initial results for galaxies detected by 2MASS, including LSB objects, are described in several publications (Schneider et al. 1997; Jarrett et al. 2000a,b; Hurt et al. 2000).
The sample selected for this study was extracted before the 2MASS data acquisition was completed, using an earlier version of the software extraction algorithms. However, comparisons between the final data and the earlier results show they are consistent. We also used the full 2MASS database, not just the high signal-to-noise sources that form the final catalog, so that our sample includes many fainter sources than are part of the publicly released catalogs.
The input to the LCSB processor is a fully cleaned Atlas image in
each band, where stars and previously found extended sources have been
entirely masked. The image is then blocked up (using three independent
kernel sizes: ,
and
pixels) and "boxcar''
smoothed to increase the signal-to-noise ratio for large (but faint)
objects normally hidden in the pixel noise. The detection step consists of
3-
threshold isolation of local peaks in cleaned, smoothed images.
Source detections are then parameterised, with the primary measurements
being: signal-to-noise ratio of the peak pixel, radial extent,
integrated signal-to-noise ratio, surface brightness, integrated
flux, and signal-to-noise ratio measurements using a J+H+
combined
"super-coadd'' image. In principle, the "super-coadd'' provides the best
medium from which to find faint LSB galaxies, given the effective increase
in the signal-to-noise ratio.
The LCSB processor could be falsely triggered by faint stars and the wings of the PSF around bright stars. Meteor streaks (and other transient phenomena) that were not fully cleaned from the Atlas images could also generate numerous false LCSB sources. It is important to note that LCSB-detected sources were nearly always fainter than the catalogue limit of the 2MASS survey, so their exclusion from the released catalogue does not significantly compromise its completeness. Further information and some early science results with 2MASS LCSB galaxies can be found in Jarrett et al. (2000a).
We selected sources with
.
The usefulness
of this criterion for the selection of LSB galaxies has been shown in
Jarrett et al. (1998) for selecting LSB galaxies in the Coma cluster and SA57 region.
![]() |
Figure 1:
The sky coverage of the selected sample of 2MASS LSB galaxies
is illustrated by the distribution of the objects which were observed in H I.
The plot is in equatorial coordinates; the dotted line indicates the Galactic
plane and the dashed lines the
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
To select our sample of LSB galaxies, we exclude the region inside the Zone of
Avoidance (
)
where the confusion rate between multiple
stars and galaxies is high, as well as the declinations not suited for observations
with the Nançay and Arecibo radio telescopes.
Thus the area of the sky covered by our survey ranges from
to
0
and from
12
to +60
in declination,
and the galactic latitude of our sources is
.
In order to decide which of these faint sources really are galaxies, additional data on them were used that were listed in online databases such as NED (NASA Extragalactic Database) http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu, LEDA (Lyon-Meudon} Extragalactic Database) - recently incorporated in HyperLeda [http://www-obs.univ-lyon1/hypercat/] - and Aladin of the Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg (CDS) [http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr], and by inspecting their Digital Sky Survey (DSS) optical images. As the acquisition and interpretation of these supplementary data for 34 000 sources was deemed to be too laborious, and as we intended, after a first inspection of the sample, to concentrate our multi-wavelength observations (see Sect. 5) on the larger-sized objects, we limited this phase of the selection procedure to all 2000 objects in the subset of "large'' sources ( rK20 > 20'') and to 3000 randomly selected objects in the subset of "small'' sources ( 20''> rK20 > 10''). Using this procedure, we selected a total of 3736 and 59 candidate 2MASS LSB galaxies from the sources extracted by the GALWORKS standard and LCSB algorithms, respectively. The total sample of 3796 objects constitutes our working database of 2MASS LSB galaxies.
As the selected LCSB sources are not part of the standard 2MASS data released for public use, unlike the other sources, we show their near-infrared images in Fig. 2.
It should be noted that the selection of the infrared sources presented in this work,
which are all derived from 2MASS J, H and -band imaging, was made in
late 1999, when work on the 2MASS database was still in full progress.
The five-year evolution of both detection and source
characterization was driven by improvements in the pipeline reductions
and the image calibration. These are realized through preliminary database
holdings and public "sampler'' data releases, incremental data releases and finally
the All Sky data release that achieved its milestone in March of 2003.
Accordingly, the current sample is a mixture of these data releases,
which are described in the 2MASS Explanatory Supplement,
see URL http://www.ipac.caltech.edu/2mass/releases/allsky/doc/explsup.html.
The Large and Small sources put in parentheses in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, are those that are only found in the All Sky working databases, and not in the subsequent, more reliable, public data releases. Only 23 of the 836 Large sources we selected from the working databases do not occur in later data releases, as do 27 from the 2900 Small sources. Of these 50 non-confirmed sources, 41 have an entry in the PGC and 24 in other optical galaxy catalogues.
The situation is different for the 59 Faint sources, as these were selected for our survey using a dedicated LSB source detection routine (see Sect. 2.2), and none of them appeared in the working databases. Seventeen of them do appear in later public releases, however: see Table 3, where, for the sake of consistency, we have also put the names of the Faint sources that are not found in later public data releases in brackets.
The basic parameters listed in Tables 1-3 are as follows:
![]() |
Figure 3:
Comparison between the normalized distributions of several measures of
infrared surface brightness in the ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
As in Fig. 3, for a number of other infrared photometric parameters:
rK20 is the major-axis radius at the 20 mag arcsec-2 isophotal level in the ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
-band isophotal radius:
rK20 is the major-axis
radius at the
mag arcsec-2 elliptical isophote. Our 2MASS samples tend
to be dominated by sources near the minimum radius, while the NGC samples are
weighted toward angularly larger objects. The optical LSB sample is also dominated
by smaller sources.
-band isophotal magnitude: K20 is the total magnitude
within the
mag arcsec-2 elliptical isophote. Here again the 2MASS and optical
LSB samples are weighted toward sources nearer the completeness limits of 2MASS,
while the NGC samples include relatively bright objects.
Infrared axis ratio: b/a is determined from an ellipse fit
to the co-addition of the J-, H-, and
-band
images. The fit is made at the 3-
isophotal level relative to the
background noise in each image. (The Faint 2MASS LCSBs sample was not measured
in this way because of the low S/N levels of the emission.) A sample of randomly
oriented disc galaxies would exhibit a relatively flat distribution of b/a,
while inclusion of elliptical galaxies and systems dominated by the bulge component
tends to give a rising distribution toward larger values of b/a
(e.g., Mihalas & Binney 1981). The NGC and optical LSB samples exhibit
some tendency toward the distribution expected for bulge domination in
the infrared, but the 2MASS samples show dominance by high-inclination systems,
which is more pronounced for the Large sample than for the Small sources.
This is due to the combined effects of the limits in observed central surface brightness
and in apparent diameter, since, measured at a given isophotal level, highly inclined galaxies
appear larger than more face-on objects with a similar intrinsic surface brightness
profile. In particular the Large sample will contain an
over-representation of highly inclined, intrinsically quite low surface brightness sources.
Infrared colour:
(J-K)20 is the difference in J- and
-band magnitudes measured within the
mag arcsec-2 elliptical isophote.
The samples peak near (J-K)=1, which is found quite generally for all galaxy
types. The LCSB sample is bluer (0.9 mag), while the Small 2MASS sample is somewhat
redder (1.2 mag) than the average. Although these colour differences may
partly reflect differences in the K-correction due to galaxy redshift
(bluer for nearer, redder for more distant), these are estimated to be of the
order of 0.1 mag at most, however, and cannot explain the much larger observed
differences.
![]() |
Figure 5:
As in Fig. 3 for a number of optical and
optical-infrared colours, based on total corrected extrapolated magnitudes from 2MASS measured in the
![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
The total corrected -band infrared magnitudes,
,
were derived by modelling
the increase in flux with successively larger apertures and extrapolating to a total
magnitude. No corrections were applied for inclination or extinction, as these are
in practice negligible at this wavelength.
The estimated uncertainty in the extrapolated
magnitudes is of the
order of 0.15 mag for
mag, a typical value for the sample.
The total corrected optical magnitudes from LEDA are mostly derived from isophotal
magnitudes, with corrections for galactic extinction, inclination and extinction
effects (see Paturel et al. 1997). As the extinction correction depends on the
morphological type, only galaxies with a
value and a morphological
type listed in LEDA were considered. This limits the percentage of useable 2MASS
LSB galaxies in the Large, Small and Faint categories to 63%, 15% and 5%,
respectively, and the optically selected LSBs to 60%.
In comparisons between the U, B, V, and I bands, both the Large and Small 2MASS samples tend to be bluer than the optical samples: the optical LSB sample ("LSB opt'' in plot) is next bluest, and the NGC samples exhibit the reddest colours. (The LCSB Faint source sample had too few sources with LEDA optical magnitudes to show meaningful colour distributions in these plots.) It is well established that the average HSB galaxy tend to be redder than the average, non-dwarf LSB (e.g., O'Neil et al. 1997; Gerritsen & de Blok 1999; Burkholder et al. 2001). The presence in the Impey et al. "optical LSB'' sample of a significant fraction of galaxies with relatively high central surface brightness, which can in fact be considered as HSBs, may well explain the intermediairy colours found for this sample.
Regarding the
colour, the Large and Small NGC galaxies have
an average of 3.6 and standard deviations of 1.3 and 0.3, respectively, while
the optical LSBs are slightly bluer,
.
Of the 2MASS samples, that
of the Faint objects is the reddest on average,
,
while the Small
sources are also fairly red,
,
but the mean of the Large 2MASS sample
is
.
Thus the infrared LSBs are not necessarily optical LSBs, according
to our working definition of
mag arcsec-2, as the adopted
-band
selection limit of 18 mag arcsec-2 corresponds to a mean blue value of
20.8 mag arcsec-2
for their mean colour, though this includes the (unknown) contribution from the
bulges.
We had initially expected an infrared-selected sample of LSB galaxies to have
redder colours than optical samples, but instead it appears that by requiring
mag arcsec-2, we may have succeeded primarily in eliminating galaxies
with significant bulge contributions. This already suggests that there is not
a significant red population of LSB galaxies, although we note that the Large
and Small 2MASS samples span a wide range of colours, particularly as measured
in
.
To better understand the infrared LSB galaxies' properties we have carried out a multi-wavelength study of subsets of manageable size. These results will be described in subsequent papers (II-V). For observations in the 21-cm H I line we selected two subsets: one of 367 Large, Small and Faint 2MASS LSBs for observations at Arecibo and another of 334 Large 2MASS LSBs for observations at Nançay, taking into account the difference in sensitivity and sky coverage of the two telescopes. The Arecibo and Nançay data will be presented in, respectively, Papers II and III of the present series. We have obtained CCD surface photometry of 35 objects in the B, V, R and I-bands using the 1.5-meter telescope at the San Pedro Martír Observatory in Mexico. These surface photometry data will be presented in Paper IV. Finally, in Paper V we will further analyse the infrared LSBs to better understand, e.g. their properties as a function of their colours, investigating whether there is a significant population of red LSB galaxies, and to see if these objects follow the "standard'' Tully-Fisher relation of HSB galaxies. In a related paper (Boissier et al. 2003), we present models of the evolution of samples of LSBs, including the 2MASS objects for which we obtained optical surface photometry.
Acknowledgements
We want to thank the referee, Dr. N. Bergvall, for his comments. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This research also has made use of the Lyon-Meudon Extragalactic Database (LEDA), recently incorporated in HyperLeda, the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the Aladin database, operated at the CDS, Strasbourg, France. We acknowledge financial support from CNRS/NSF collaboration grant No. 10637.
Table 1a: Large objects.
Table 1b: continued.
Table 1c: continued.
Table 1d: continued.
Table 1e: continued.
Table 1f: continued.
Table 1g: continued.
Table 1h: continued.
Table 1i: continued.
Table 1j: continued.
Table 1k: continued.
Table 2a: Small objects.
Table 2b: continued.
Table 2c: continued.
Table 2d: continued.
Table 2e: continued.
Table 2f: continued.
Table 2g: continued.
Table 2h: continued.
Table 2i: continued.
Table 2j: continued.
Table 2k: continued.
Table 2l: continued.
Table 2m: continued.
Table 2n: continued.
Table 2o: continued.
Table 2p: continued.
Table 2q: continued.
Table 2r: continued.
Table 2s: continued.
Table 2t: continued.
Table 2u: continued.
Table 2v: continued.
Table 2w: continued.
Table 2x: continued.
Table 2y: continued.
Table 2z: continued.
Table 2aa: continued.
Table 2ab: continued.
Table 2ac: continued.
Table 2ad: continued.
Table 2ae: continued.
Table 2af: continued.
Table 2ag: continued.
Table 2ah: continued.
Table 2ai: continued.
Table 2aj: continued.
Table 2ak: continued.
Table 3: LCSB objects - the Faint sources sample.
![]() |
Figure 2:
a. 2MASS images of the selected LCSB sources:
J-band greyscale images with superimposed ![]() |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 2: continued. |
Open with DEXTER |