The tidal component of the secular acceleration of the Moon's longitude is a
fundamental parameter of the evolution of the Earth-Moon system. The tidal
dissipation is due to a misalignment of the tidal bulge of the Earth relative
to the Earth-Moon direction. This bulge exerts a secular torque and most of
the effect comes from the ocean tides.
It produces a secular negative acceleration of the Moon and a decrease in the
Earth's rotation rate (increase of the length of day).
A consequence of the negative acceleration in the lunar longitude of
approximately
is the well-known displacement of the
Moon's barycenter that corresponds to an increase of the Earth-Moon distance
of 3.8 cm/year.
Let us examine the quadratic terms of the lunar mean longitude
W1(2) as it appears in the analytical lunar theory ELP2000-96
(Chapront et al. 1997).
Here the constants and parameters are those from DE245, in particular
Love numbers and time delays (see Sect. 8).
W1(2) contains mainly 3 contributions (in
):
[1] 5.8665 Planetary perturbations;
[2] 0.1925 Earth's figure perturbations;
[3] -12.8125 Tides.
These contributions have to be multiplied by 2 if we speak of "secular
acceleration'' components.
In [1] the main effect is due to the secular variation of the solar eccentricity. It represents in fact a Taylor expansion of long periodic perturbations, mentioned also as "secular perturbations'' in classical celestial mechanics, with periods of the solar perigee and node of several ten thousand years.
In [2] the contribution is of the same nature. Hence, [1] and [2] are due to very long period effects. They have to be distinguished from the tides that induce dissipative forces. An analytical solution for the lunar motion also provides secular terms of higher degree in time (t3-terms, t4-terms, etc.). With the knowledge of all the secular components in the longitude, we are able to isolate the tidal acceleration from other perturbations.
We gather in Table 6 a non-exhaustive list of determinations of
the tidal secular acceleration of the lunar longitude.
The most recent values have been obtained with LLR observations.
We note, for this type of determination, a significant improvement of the
precision with more observations.
It is also worth noticing that the most recent determination around
comes closer to the value of
Morrison & Ward (1975),
,
obtained with
an analysis of optical observations including occultations and planetary
transits covering a time interval of approximately 2 centuries.
Authors | Value | Publication |
Spencer Jonesa | -22 | 1939 |
Oesterwinter & Cohena | -38 | 1975 |
Morrison & Warda | -26 | 1975 |
Mullerb | -30 | 1976 |
Calame & Mulhollandc | -24.6 | 1978 |
Ferrari et al.d | -23.8 | 1980 |
Dickey et al.c | -23.8 | 1982 |
Dickey and Williamsc | -25.10 | 1982 |
Newhall et al.c | -24.90 | 1988 |
Chapront Touzé et al.c | -25.62 | 1997 |
(Solution S1998)c | -25.78 | 1999b |
(Solution S2000)c | -25.836 | 2000 |
(this paper, solution 2001)c | -25.858 |
Type of observations: a Occultations, b eclipses,
c LLR, d LLR and Lunar orbiter.
It is interesting to examine the intrinsic values of the tidal
acceleration in various JPL numerical integrations (see Table 7).
These values do not appear explicitly in the lists of parameters that are
provided with each lunar ephemeris, but we have computed them from those
parameters and from the models described in Sect. 8.
It is worth noticing that the difference between the tidal secular
acceleration in DE405 and our determination in S2001 is about
which gives an idea of the present uncertainty for
this fundamental lunar parameter.
JPL ephemeris | Value | Publication |
DE200 | -23.895 | 1982 |
DE245 | -25.625 | 1990 |
DE403 | -25.580 | 1995 |
DE405 | -25.826 | 1998 |
The expression of the lunar mean longitude of the Moon W1 has the
following secular expansion:
W1 = W1(0) + W1(1) t + W1(2) t2 +..., where
t is the time in century reckoned from J2000.0;
W1(0) is the constant term;
W1(1) is the sidereal mean motion for J2000.0;
W1(2) is the total half secular acceleration of the Moon.
We have investigated the convergence of these quantities to the S2001 values
given in Table 4, when the upper limit of the time interval of
observations increases.
The results are given in Fig. 3 where
,
and
are the
corrections to S2001 values obtained in the intermediate solutions
(1996-2001).
In particular the variation of
shows the evolution of
the fitted value of the tidal acceleration when using more and more recent
LLR observations:
as mentioned above W1(2) is the sum of several contributions
listed [1], [2] and [3] at the beginning of the present section, and
we may assume that [1] and [2] have been computed with sufficient
accuracy through the secular terms in ELP theory;
only [3] (half tidal acceleration) needs to be fit.
This graph allows us to ensure nowadays a realistic precision in the knowledge
of the secular acceleration of better than
,
in agreement
with the conclusion resulting from the comparison of the S2001 value
to the DE405 one.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Time evolution of the corrections ![]() |
Copyright ESO 2002