next previous
Up: A new determination of


   
5 Orbital motion


 

 
Table 2: Solution S2001: corrections to the nominal values of the orbital parameters formerly fit to DE200 (in arcsecond, except for $\nu $ and n', in arcsecond/cy).
     
Variable Sol. 1 (MCEP) Sol. 2 (ICRS)
     
     
W1(0) -0.1218 $\pm$ 0.0002 -0.0775 $\pm$ 0.0002
W2(0) -0.0673 $\pm$ 0.0002 -0.0229 $\pm$ 0.0002
W3(0) -0.1155 $\pm$ 0.0005 -0.0717 $\pm$ 0.0005
$\nu $ -0.3978 $\pm$ 0.0008 -0.4033 $\pm$ 0.0008
$\Gamma$   0.0008 $\pm$ 0.0000   0.0009 $\pm$ 0.0000
E   0.0002 $\pm$ 0.0000   0.0002 $\pm$ 0.0000
T(0) -0.0770 $\pm$ 0.0002 -0.0326 $\pm$ 0.0002
$\varpi'^{(0)}$ -0.0587 $\pm$ 0.0003 -0.0140 $\pm$ 0.0003
n'   0.0304 $\pm$ 0.0008   0.0258 $\pm$ 0.0008
e'   0.0000 $\pm$ 0.0000   0.0000 $\pm$ 0.0000



 

 
Table 3: Solution S2001: fitted value of tidal part of the quadratic term of the mean longitude (in arcsecond/cy2) and observed corrections to the mean motion of perigee and node (in arcsecond/cy).
Variable Sol. 1 (MCEP) Sol. 2 (ICRS)
     
     
W1(2,T) -12.9257 $\pm$ 0.0016 -12.9290 $\pm$ 0.0016
$\Delta W_{2}^{(1)}$    0.0334 $\pm$ 0.0008     0.0317 $\pm$ 0.0008
$\Delta W_{3}^{(1)}$  -0.3806 $\pm$ 0.0097   -0.3611 $\pm$ 0.0097


The main results are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. They can be compared to analogous tables in Chapront et al. (1999b, 2000). The uncertainties reported in these tables are formal errors.

Table 2 shows the corrections to the nominal values of the orbital parameters of the Moon which were formerly fit to JPL ephemerides DE200. These basic parameters are regarded as nominal values in our lunar ephemeris ELP2000. They have been used in our work since 1982 (Chapront-Touzé & Chapront 1983, 1988) and maintained to facilitate further comparison. The origin of angles is $\gamma_{2000}^{I}({\rm MCEP})$ in Sol. 1 (MCEP) and $\gamma _{2000}^{I}({\rm ICRS})$ in Sol. 2 (ICRS). The differences between the angles W1(0), W2(0), W3(0) in Sol. 1 (MCEP) and in Sol. 2 (ICRS) are close to the value of :

\begin{eqnarray*}\psi ({\rm MCEP}) = \gamma_{2000}^{I}({\rm ICRS}) \gamma_{2000}^{I}({\rm MCEP}) = 0.0445''
\end{eqnarray*}


given below (see Table 9). For all the quantities, the differences, corrected by $\psi$ for angles, are less than 3$\sigma$ except for $\nu $ and n'. We note that the differences $\nu _{{\rm MCEP}}-\nu _{{\rm ICRS}}$ and $n'_{{\rm MCEP}}-n'_{{\rm ICRS}}$ are almost equal, around 0.0050''/cy, and do not vary significantly with the time interval of observations in the intermediate solutions (1996-2001) (see Sect. 1). This suggests a slight drift between the two frames that is not yet completely clarified.


 

 
Table 4: Angular mean elements of the Moon and the Earth-Moon barycenter and Delaunay arguments deduced from S2001. The origin of the angles is $\gamma _{2000}^{I}({\rm ICRS})$ (see Fig. 2); t is the time in Julian centuries reckoned from J2000.0.
W1 = $218^{\circ}18'59\farcs878~2
~+1~732~559~343\farcs332~8~t
~-\hphantom{1}6\farcs870~0~t^2
~+0\farcs006~604~t^3
~-0\farcs000~031~69~t^4$
W2 = $\hphantom{1}83^{\circ}21'11\farcs651~8
~+\hphantom{1}\hphantom{1}~14~643~420\...
...s330~4~t
~-38\farcs263~9~t^2
~-0\farcs045~047~t^3
~+0\farcs000~213~01~t^4$
W3 = $125^{\circ}02'40\farcs326~5
~-\hphantom{1}\hphantom{1}\hphantom{1}~6~967~919\...
...~+\hphantom{1}6\farcs359~3~t^2
~+0\farcs007~625~t^3
~-0\farcs000~035~86~t^4$
T = $100^{\circ}27'59\farcs188~0
~+\hphantom{1}~129~597~742\farcs301~6~t
~-\hphantom{1}0\farcs020~2~t^2
~+0\farcs000~009~t^3
~+0\farcs000~000~15~t^4$
$\varpi'$ = $102^{\circ}56'14\farcs413~6
~+\hphantom{1}\hphantom{1}\hphantom{1}\hphantom{1...
...tom{1}0\farcs532~7~t^2
~-0\farcs000~138~t^3
\hphantom{~+0.000~000~00''~t^0}$
l = $134^{\circ}57'48\farcs226~4
~+1~717~915~923\farcs002~4~t
~+31\farcs393~9~t^2
~+0\farcs051~651~t^3
~-0\farcs000~244~70~t^4$
l' = $357^{\circ}31'44\farcs774~4
~+\hphantom{1}~129~596~581\farcs073~3~t
~-\hphantom{1}0\farcs552~9~t^2
~+0\farcs000~147~t^3
~+0\farcs000~000~15~t^4$
F = $\hphantom{1}93^{\circ}16'19\farcs551~7
~+1~739~527~263\farcs217~9~t
~-13\farcs229~3~t^2
~-0\farcs001~021~t^3
~+0\farcs000~004~17~t^4$
D = $297^{\circ}51'00\farcs690~2
~+1~602~961~601\farcs031~2~t
~-\hphantom{1}6\farcs849~8~t^2
~+0\farcs006~595~t^3
~-0\farcs000~031~84~t^4$


Table 3 shows the observed value W1(2,T), and the bias in the mean motions W2(1), W3(1). It is worthwhile to note the agreement of the three quantities determined independently in the two solutions; it was not the case in S1998 for W1(2,T) and W3(1).

Table 4 gives the expressions of the angular mean elements of the Moon and of the Earth-Moon barycenter, and the corresponding Delaunay arguments deduced from the S2001 Sol. 2 (ICRF):
- the mean longitude and the mean longitudes of perigee and node of the Moon (W1, W2, W3);
- the heliocentric orbital parameters of the Earth-Moon barycenter (T, $\varpi'$);
- the Delaunay arguments: l=W1-W2, $l'=T-\varpi '$, F= W1- W3 and $D=W_1-T+180^{\circ}$.
The mean motions are referred to J2000.0 and the origin of the angles is $\gamma _{2000}^{I}({\rm ICRS})$ (see Fig. 2).


 

 
Table 5: Fit of the positions and velocities of the two observing LLR stations CERGA (Yag) and McDONALD (MLRS2). Units: positions X, Y, Z in meters; velocities $\dot{X},~\dot{Y},~\dot{Z}$ in meter/year.
CERGA (Yag) X Y Z $\dot{X}$ $\dot{Y}$ $\dot{Z}$
             
             
References            
ITRF1994 Epoch 1993.0  4581692.254   556195.961  4389355.019 -0.0122  0.0194  0.0084
ITRF1996 Epoch 1997.0  4581692.217   556196.039  4389355.075 -0.0120  0.0189  0.0106
ITRF2000 Epoch 1997.0  4581692.181   556196.024  4389355.072 -0.0131  0.0189  0.0101
Corrections            
S2001 Sol. 2 (ICRS) -0.012 -0.006 -0.001 -0.0008  0.0000    0.0036
Comparisons            
ITRF96 - ITRF2000  0.036  0.015  0.003      
S2001*  - ITRF96 -0.027 -0.008 -0.017      
S2001*  - ITRF2000  0.009  0.007 -0.014      
S2001** - ITRF2000  0.005  0.007  0.001      
             
             
McDONALD (MLRS2) X Y Z $\dot{X}$ $\dot{Y}$ $\dot{Z}$
             
             
References            
ITRF1994 Epoch 1993.0 -1330021.390 -5328403.336  3236481.726 -0.0116 -0.0036 -0.0073
ITRF1996 Epoch 1997.0 -1330021.431 -5328403.340  3236481.672 -0.0117 -0.0034 -0.0064
ITRF2000 Epoch 1997.0 -1330021.440 -5328403.330  3236481.675 -0.0125 -0.0001 -0.0065
Corrections            
S2001 Sol. 2 (ICRS) -0.006  0.005 -0.031 -0.0004 -0.0007   -0.0002
Comparisons            
ITRF96 - ITRF2000  0.009 -0.010 -0.003      
S2001*  - ITRF96 -0.015  0.009 -0.003      
S2001*  - ITRF2000 -0.006 -0.001 -0.006      
S2001** - ITRF2000 -0.008 -0.004 -0.007      



next previous
Up: A new determination of

Copyright ESO 2002